![]() |
Book Club: Losing Hurts Twice as Bad |
|
by Christopher Fettweis, September 26, 2008 |
||
Buy the damn bookSurveying the American occupation of Iraq, Tulane political science
professor Fettweis maintains that the war is a lost—and utterly
pointless—cause and that the only rational course for America is to
accept defeat and withdraw so that the process of national
recovery—marked by four distinct stages (shock and denial, anger,
depression and acceptance)—can begin. Precipitous withdrawal is
possible because none of the feared consequences of such an
action—humanitarian disaster, regional instability or loss of U.S.
credibility—is remotely likely, in Fettweis's view. Linking the debacle
in Iraq to the post-WWII grand strategy of internationalism, the author
argues for a return to the founding fathers' favored foreign policy of
strategic restraint. Such a retreat from the world, the author claims,
is virtually risk-free because today's threats are minimal, and the
resulting peace dividend would be better spent at home on priorities
like Hurricane Katrina recovery. Fettweis's thesis—although
well-intentioned—rests on several narrowly argued assumptions: the war
in Iraq is unwinnable and the national security implications [of
withdrawal] will be minimal. More polemic than scholarship, this book
will likely generate more heat than light.
The inimitable Christopher J. Fettweis guest blogged for Jewcy all this past week, and in that time he shared his opinion that most Americans would rather vote for Yosemite Sam than George Kennan, explained why America should adopt a strategy of restraint, demonstrated that the coming election isn't necessarily all that important, compared his misuse of a credit card as a college student to America's problem with debt, and showed us how schadenfreude can ease our distress as the US collapses. Check out his posts, join the conversation, and pick up a copy of his book.
Rob
If one feels charitable, you could forgive Christopher Fettweis, military strategy expert (LOL) teacher of strategy at the US Naval War College (God help us) for expressing restraint a decade ago but after 9/11 his view can only be viewed as irresponsible and blind. His current book which is apparently cheering for a defeat in Iraq could be forgiven if were written three years ago but with the success of the surge and progress of the first Iraqi democracy in the heart of the middle-east, it can also been seen as retrograde and out-of-date.
I cannot help but wonder if Chris, as a starry-eyed youth chose beta-max over VHS; Webtv over a computer, and Intellivison over Atari.
But who knows, he may be right.
If he is, I hope he laughs all the way to Washington Mutual bank.
Zeevico
I don't know about withdrawal. But from what I've read of Iraqis and the Iraqi government, I don't hold any long-term hopes for Iraqi democracy. As a people, Iraqis seem unwilling to implement a truly democratic state. Iraqis don't think of themselves in strictly national terms. They regard themselves as Iraqi Shia or Sunni. More specifically some probably regard themselves as members of tribes, or alterantively as members of fundamentalist religious movements, such as the Mahdi army, which receives Iranian funding but is really an Iraqi Islamist-Nationalist group.. Each faction would like to see itself at the top, but all of them envision some sort of Iraqi nation, except the Kurds, who are quite happy on their own. The conflict is based on intense sectarian hatred, rivalry and conspiracy theory. As long as the nation proceeds along sectarian or tribal rivalries, the existence of the Iraqi government and Iraqi democracy is very, very tenuous. One thing's for sure--if Iraqi democracy stumbles, the Kurds will be first before the wall.
Anonymous
I guess the presence of Fettwies on the Tulane faculty is further evidence that New Orleans has yet to recover from Katrina
Rob
Iraqi Constitution - 2005
According to "intellectuals" like Fettweis, this was all a mistake and a crime undertaken by cowboys (cue hillbilly music) and "neo-cons" (cue hasidic fiddlers on the roof).
Removing the obstacles to the first Islamic democracy in the heart of the middle-east will make the world safer as the world becomes increasingly smaller.