Sun, Mar 21, 2010

User login

TAG:

Meditation

The Gods of Drowning

Drown, Don't Swim
Jay Michaelson
 
In the forms of meditation practiced by many Westerners, one central practice is simply "being with" everything that arises in the body, mind, heart, etc., neither holding onto anything nor pushing anything away. This is quite different from most Jewish and psychiatric practices, which often seek to change these states--from sadness into joy, for example, or restlessness into peace. And it is entirely different from our basic instinct, which, thanks to eons of evolution, is exactly to hold onto the good stuff and push away the rest. If we didn't do that, we'd never survive. Indeed, self-preservation is surely the purpose of registering stimuli as positive or negative in the first place.

Happiness, too, is unnatural. Once again, if we were all perfectly happy with what we already have, we wouldn't strive for more. We wouldn't reproduce, wouldn't compete for scarce resources--and we'd be selected right out of the species. So it's human nature to be somewhat unhappy, and to work to address that unhappiness by taking action, building things, having children, nurturing them, and building cooperative communities of love. All these things feel so right because we've been bred for them.

So what the Dalai Lama has called "the art of happiness" is unnatural in its means and its ends. Its means are counter to basic human instinct, and its promised end of happiness is the opposite of our natural (naturally selected) disposition.

But given the choice between Buddhist-style being-with and Jewish-style fighting negative emotions, I'll take the Buddha, thanks. Nothing depresses me more than trying to be happy.

In my own practice, I've often experienced "being with" negative emotions in a visual way, seeing myself as someone nearly drowning in mud or excrement, but managing to be with it, to stay alive and breathe. For years, this extremely unhelpful image both encouraged and betrayed me. Encouraged, because it emboldened me to stay with it, like a dharma fighter on the cushion. Betrayed, because the whole image contains an inevitable aura of resistance--of fighting, enduring, persisting. Actually, it was more Jewish than Buddhist. After all, how many Jewish mothers does it take to change a light bulb? "None, dahling, I'm fine here in the dark." We stay, we complain, we endure.

But what I've learned over the last few months, in the wake of breakup, loneliness, heartbreak, and occasional rebirth, is the benefit of drowning. There's been so much pain for me in this period that I couldn't fight it if I tried (and I have tried). If I were really standing in a deep pile of mud, it would've covered me long ago. And so I've let it. And I found I can breathe underwater.

Instead of fighting to stay afloat in the indignity, anger, sadness, unpleasant physical sensations, I've just myself sink down, and down, and down... and sometimes, through. The lesson is: I thought I needed air, but I don't. I can breathe in the mud, and the act of surrendering to it is the relaxation and release.

What about the other times? The other times I do one of two things. Either I feed the negative emotion with stories, self-pity, and endless thoughts about what's wrong--or I fight the negative emotion with more stories, justifications, or accounts of why this happened or how I should act next. Either way, the effort is the problem. Sadness is like quicksand: moving in any direction makes it worse. But it's unlike quicksand in that the point is to sink in, be swallowed--and be fine.

Surrender and Supplication

This surrender, this willingness to be thoroughly taken and destroyed by sadness, is consonant with two quite different faces of God that I experience in my religious life.

The first of these faces is the nondual, which is essentially mental where the personal is emotional. This is the nondual truth that God is the yotzer or u'vorei choshech, the Former of light and Creator of darkness. This God offers a different kind of comfort; not the love of the Friend, but the simple truth of what is. This God is not necessarily nice; it's the God of cancer wards as well as summer pastures, of war as well as love. This is the God that asks us if we can handle the truth: that both evil and good are godly.

But then there is also the personal God, the emotional one, the one to whom I cry. The personal is the devotional, the place of faith and trust: hinei el yeshuati, eftach v'lo efchad. Behold, God is my salvation; I will trust and not fear. This personal, devotional, anthropomorphic God is largely projection; it's a way of seeing more than a thing that is seen. But as projection, God is a precious Friend, a beloved, a companion.

My religious life oscillates between these poles. At times, I love to think of God in what are essentially human terms. This is the God to whom I pray--and of whom I say "whom." This is the God that is You. At other times, I love the clarity of the more atheistic, nondual God: What Is, YHVH. And of course, I've long understood that these "poles" are better expressed as two sides of a single coin, or two perspectives on the aperspectival.

But I've only recently understood how these two perspectives so deeply enrich one another. When I'm drowning in the shit of life, I say hinei el yeshuati precisely because God is the vorei choshech. I can trust that I can breathe in this mud because the mud is God. Not good--it's definitely not good in any ordinary sense of the word. But God. I can cry out because I can let myself be drowned.

For the Seal of God is Truth

If all these words were just words, just theological proposition, they wouldn't be worth much. What's more important-at least to me-- is that I can experience the nondual God. After the surrender, during the drowning, the Presence is still there. That's what matters--not the premise but the proof.

I know, because I've heard from others, that the path of embracing light and darkness which I've sketched over these last few months is not for everyone, and is not necessarily the dominant strain in the Jewish religious tradition. I also know that it's difficult to tread, and difficult to share with others. No one really likes negative energy, even if, for me, it connects me to the parts of myself I like the most: the open, feeling, truthful, loving, and teaching parts. It's good at retreats, not so good at parties.

So given all of that, it's important to me to see that this idiosyncratic, difficult, and not-for-everybody religious path actually works. I assume that the more conventional one--fighting sadness with joy, accentuating the positive--works also, since I see so many people following it and seeming to have success. But I'm a truth addict. Anything that seems to be coloring or distorting what is feels uncomfortable, even insincere. Just to see that it is possible to breathe while drowning gives me the trust to do it more.

Just the release in my own heart is enough to make the effort/non-effort worthwhile. But there are three consequences I want to notice briefly before concluding.

First, as the "law of attraction" is increasingly popular these days, just a word about that. The main point is that "breathing while drowning" is not wallowing. Emitting negative energy, dwelling on it, turning it over, is even more counterproductive than trying to struggle over to the positive side. The point is total surrender, total release. Not judging anything as good or bad. Not feeding the fire (to switch elemental metaphors) or trying to squelch it. Just letting it happen, letting it burn--and letting it burn me up, only to discover that I am not consumed. In that fiery place, love is possible, as is positive intention. I continue to believe that the specific directionality of conscious manifestation is ineffective. But in my experience, there is power to a general setting of intention, and a general openness to abundance. These are enhanced, not compromised, by surrender.

Second, as I mentioned a moment ago, I'm at my most real when I'm most connected to my brokenness--and I'm at my most effective as well. Having just taught at two Nehirim retreats, I've seen firsthand that I am more effective and compassionate as a teacher when I'm not pretending to be okay. I don't know about you, but I can't stand these teachers who hold themselves out as never-suffering and so successful. I have met a few enlightened people, and it is indeed possible to end suffering. But only a small percentage of teachers who hold themselves out in this way actually are, and many are offering a kind of false consciousness. I don't trust them. In any case, even if all the authentic teachers were teaching the cheerleading approach, I'd stick with mine because it's true in my experience.

And speaking of my experience, I finally want to note that this doesn't work all the time--but it is available all the time. On a particularly lonely night recently, I just couldn't break free of the mental pattern of self-pity, blame, and regret. Even now, there are so many opportunities for it; just one evocation of one issue from my just-ended relationship, and I can get hooked into content and story and argumentation. It's almost irresistible. But unlike trying to swim, which gets more difficult the deeper you sink, drowning is always available. If I can't "make it work," I can surrender to having failed at making it work--and then it works. There is always a new opportunity to surrender more, even to the most inveterate of Buddhist sinners like me.

Ultimately, the method remains a simple one: releasing whatever is going on (but really), letting go, letting drown, letting expand, letting relax. Breathing while drowning, the attention naturally comes to the present, with nothing pulling it elsewhere. And then, with a breath, without hope, expectation, or object, a simple wish of love.

 

Art Credit: Sushanta Meh

 


 

Mix and Match Mantras For An Extra Spiritual Kick

Elisa
 

Ommmmm: This guy's been hanging out in the mantra trailerOmmmmm: This guy's been hanging out in the mantra trailer"I Will Survive" + "I Am Nothing" = the truth is somewhere in between. From the addictive website for The Mantra Trailer:

Parked at the intersection of imagination, evangelism and propaganda, The Mantra Trailer is a traveling mediation space, recording studio and site of mysterious broadcast in the form of a 1972 breadbox trailer. The Mantra Trailer invites us to contemplate, chant, voice and explore our prayers, aspirations, desires, frustrations and petitions for the transformation of self and society, or whatever resonates within us, even the nonsensical. By-passers drawn to the Mantra Trailer are invited inside one at a time to contemplate and record their mantras in privacy.

Yes indeed, the mantra trailer is exactly what it sounds like! Click on any number of mantras (from the expected"Let It Go" and "It's All Okay" to the inscrutable "Pet The Wolf Run From The Rat") to create your own multi-layered mantra symphony. I especially like "Keep Your Eye on the Doughnut" plus "You Shall Know The Truth" plus "Concentrate and Expand." "Love" plus "Open Your Heart" is awesome. "It's All Gravy" goes well with pretty much everything. Go nuts.

The Sanskrit word mantra consists of the root man- (to think) (also in manas, or mind) and the suffix -tra (tool). So literally an "instrument of thought" or "mind tool." A mantra is a sacred word, chant or sound that is repeated during mediation to reduce our everyday material worries and elevate our worldly, spiritual aims.

Mantra Trailer mastermind Sherri Lynn Wood says mantras are "a homeopathic remedy for the mass media slogans of the day."

(Dig especially, then, the clever soul who chants "Visa takes Life.")


 
DAILY SHVITZ

Shvitz Spritz: Meditation Before Recess

Avi Kramer

FAITHHACKER

Meditate Online

Tamar Fox
I don’t know how I feel about using online resources for meditation. Something about my laptop just doesn’t scream inner peace and tranquility. In a bind, though, I might give it a shot, and I found an awesome list of ten free guided meditations available online. You can read about all ten over at Be Conscious Now, but here’s the info on the first four.
Guided meditations: You are getting sleeeeepyGuided meditations: You are getting sleeeeepy
Ommmmm…

1. Universal Soul - 6 minutes: This is a video meditation, and it’s short, so it’s a nice one to do if you only have a few moments. The trick is to treat it exactly as you would a aural meditation. Plant both feet firmly on the floor and ground yourself. Place your hands in a comfortable position on your lap. Focus on your breathing and hit play. As you watch, drop all thoughts and judgments and just lets the words, images and sounds permeate your very being. See the meditation without thinking about it, and you will feel it’s magic working. This is a stunnig experience put together by Vera Nadine. Enjoy!

2. Meet a guide - 19 minutes: I had the honour of testing this meditation before it was posted, and I loved it. I’ve long admired Jeff Lilly’s posts on his meditations, and envied his ability to ’see’ the most amazing scenes unfold before him. He really does have a knack for the visual - so I was eager to see what would happen if he guided me through a meditation. I wasn’t disappointed. Both times I have done this lovely meditation, I have ’seen’ a guide and spoken to them. It’s the most concrete visual experience I’ve had from meditation so far. No doubt part of this is because I have been meditating more and more, but I think part of it is also Jeff’s magic. This is a meditation I will be returning to time and time again. (Plus it’s a great length at just under 19 minutes…) Don’t skip the article either, Jeff has some great stuff to say about meditation, and it’s well worth reading that before clicking on the meditation.

3. Brain Sync - 10 minutes: To get access to this meditation, you need to subscribe to their newsletter, but it’s easy to immediately unsubscribe if you’re not interested. This is a great practical meditation which focuses on the physical and real first, like the breath and relaxing the muscles of the face, before moving into imagery of a deep, still lake and a refreshing waterfall. It’s described as a health and well-being meditation, but I found it invigorating and especially enjoyed the very end, when it tells you that you have everything you need in life. (Discolosure: If you go on to purchase any Brain Sync products, I do receive an affiliate commission.)

4. Visit the Angels - 30 minutes: You need to download this file, and as it is quite large (27.5MB), it can take some time. It’s only good if you’re on a high speed connection. I really enjoyed this meditation though, and am glad it’s now saved on my desktop. It does use angel imagery and angelic realms, so if these don’t resonate with you, it’s probably not the meditation for you. I was able to see and sense my guardian angels on either side of me taking me into the angelic realms, and felt the joy and happiness described in the meditation. It’s a long meditation, but the time flew past.

Day 2: Is Jewish Renewal the Next Step in Spirituality, or Boomer Narcissism?

Keep the Hootchy Cootchy out of my religion, please

From: Arthur Waskow
To: Daniel Bronstein
Subject: Speaking of false dichotomies…

Dear Daniel,

Since you’ve raised the danger of false dichotomies, let me point to an obvious one: mystical versus rational. Jewish Renewal sees the rational and mystical as intertwined. Reason cannot stand alone, but the world cannot stand without it.

Reason has brought us telephones and computers and equal rights for women. But the perversion of reasonThe Perversion of Reason: Nagasaki, 1945The Perversion of Reason: Nagasaki, 1945 has brought us H-bombs, the burning of the Amazon forest, and the shattering of local communities. Jewish Renewal embraces reason while rejecting the perversion that separates reason from spirit.

I respect many aspects of Reform Judaism. One of my heroes is Rabbi David Einhorn, a 19th-century Reform rabbi whose own congregation forced him to flee Baltimore because he called for the abolition of slavery. I am sad to say that many Reform rabbis have no idea who he was, and no interest in emulating his courage.

Reform Judaism knows it has shortcomings, but doesn’t know what they are. The most crucial one is that it never realized the need for a profoundly new paradigm of Judaism—as different from Rabbinic Judaism as Rabbinic Judaism was from Biblical Judaism.

Why am I pointing toward a new paradigm? Not because I celebrate whatever is new and reject whatever is old. If that were true, I would dump Judaism altogether.

Be Fruitful and Multiply: Urban SprawlBe Fruitful and Multiply: Urban SprawlRather, it is because I see a world in which the human race is transforming the biological web of life, changing the chemistry and climate of our planet, achieving the biblical vision of “be fruitful and multiply, fill up the earth and subdue it”—and shows no sign of stopping.

I see a world in which the Jewish people—absolutely without precedent in our history—possesses one of the world’s mightiest states and armies, and enjoys major political power within the world’s mightiest nation.

And I see a world in which Jewish women, who have for three millennia been debarred from shaping the future of Judaism, are now beginning to exercise that power.

But I see little effort outside the Renewal movement to take all this into account and shape a Judaism that works and matters. The Jewish people must reconfigure itself as a transgenerational “movement” committed to healing the planet.

To do this, we must retire the assumption of powerlessness that lies beneath all Rabbinic Judaism. It is because of this assumption that the Jewish people has evolved no code for the responsible and sacred use of power either in the US or Israel.

Only Jewish Renewal has attempted to end the dichotomy between “ceremony” and “social action” so that a seder may mean assembling 2,000 people in a public space to demand the end of Pharaoh, as we have done. And we intend to light Hanukkah candles at the headquarters of ExxonMobil to demand a policy through which the oil we now use in one day might last eight days. There are many more such examples.

Recognizing the destructive culture of overwork, JR utilizes the practice of meditation as a way to groundFighting the Culture of Overwork: Jewish Meditation at Elat ChayyimFighting the Culture of Overwork: Jewish Meditation at Elat Chayyim oneself and reconnect with God. Who else is doing this? And what other Jewish movement is nurturing organic gardens, or exploring permaculture?

Who else has proposed relinking bar/bat mitzvah to the sexual maturation that was originally at its root?

And—this is at the center of it all—who else is moving away from metaphors of God as “King” and “Lord” toward “Breathing-spirit of the universe” (ruakh ha’olam) and “Wellspring of Life” (eyin ha’chayim)?

It is hard but joyful work, swimming upstream against a Jewish and American culture that worships idols such as wealth and power. It is hardly “boomer narcissism.”

The boomers I know, and the surveys that look at them, show continued deep devotion to what we call tikkun olam. There aren’t as many sit-downs as there were 40 years ago, but there are lawyers doing Neighborhood Legal Services or challenging polluting corporations, doctors in Medecins sans Frontieres, and so on.

In fact, I wonder whether the whole notion of boomer narcissism was invented—not by you, Daniel—as a way of undermining the energy for social decency that still actuates most boomers.

Shalom!

Arthur

 

From: Daniel Bronstein
To: Arthur Waskow
Subject: Breath of Life? Or just Bad Breath?

Dear Arthur,

We’re talking past each other. We may be facing a true generation gap here.

I don’t think that anyone simply made up the idea of boomers being narcissistic. Their religious “journeys” often become one-way tickets to the mirror. Take a gander at the work of sociologists Robert Bellah or Robert Wuthnow, who have demonstrated this.

Regarding dichotomies, I’m reminded of the Three Stooges’ 1935 short film Restless Knights. FacedA Sucker for Simple Dichotomies: Jerome "Curly" HowardA Sucker for Simple Dichotomies: Jerome "Curly" Howard with the choice of having their heads cut off or being burnt at the stake, Jerome Horowitz, a.k.a. Curly Howard, decides that a “hot stake is better than a cold chop.”

Yes, the world is far more complex than strict mind versus body, mystical versus rational, or even male versus female. Judaism has always demanded a holistic life entailing attention to mind, body, and soul. And even those who history has portrayed as rationalist—the Vilna Gaon comes to mind—were also practitioners of mysticism.

I’m also no apologist for Reform Judaism, and I have no interest in a micturition contest about whose denomination, Renewal or Reform, is “better.” We all need to be open to self-criticism, but we have an obligation to critique one another as well.

Indeed, it has taken a long time for Reform Jews to become Reform rather than “reformed,” and Reform Judaism still runs the risk of becoming mired in all of the balderdash, flapdoodle, poppycock, tomfoolery, and malarkey of modernity. But neither should we be dragged backwards into pre-modernity, with all of its suffering, violence, imbecility, and general smelliness.

That is to say, I would no more study Torah strictly via the documentary hypothesis than I would try to ensure a good harvest by “hooking up” with the neighbors and doing the “hootchy cootchy” on a field. It took long enough to get away from childish, gendered definitions of divinity, and worship of the material. Why, for goodness sakes, would we want to be pulled back into this muck?

Toward the end of your 1996 book Godwrestling Round 2: Ancient Wisdom, Future Paths in the segment titled “One I” you write, “I stand inside God’s skull, behind the face; I look through God’s eyes, my face in Face, I see myself, ourself.” On the next page you write that in this experience lies “the dangers of inflating the ego and of annihilating it.”

I agree with you completely about the dangers of inflating the ego, and I find these reductionist formulas of God=world=me=us to be both obfuscating and disturbing. On the other hand, our world could use far more annihilation of ego.Nope. It's Not a Joke.: The Kabbalah energy drinkNope. It's Not a Joke.: The Kabbalah energy drink

I recently saw a sign advertising a “kabbalah” energy drink, a perfect example of what happens when we subvert serious disciplines into mass fads, cheapen the profound, and gratify our egos rather than morally and intellectually challenging ourselves. You’ve written that the “breath of all alive will bless Your Name because the breath of all alive, it is Your Name. The breath is in us and beyond us, intimate and transcendent.” Whether or not one chooses to define God as “the breath of life,” I remain concerned that this language empowers the egotistical and enables those who are unwilling to turn from the intimate to the transcendent. To equate the Name with the "I" or "Me" is bad breath.

Daniel


more »