Saudi King Calls For Interfaith Dialogue |
|
by Stephen Suleyman Schwartz, March 25, 2008 |
|
King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has announced plans to organize an "interfaith conference" among Jews, Muslims, and Christians. He invites "representatives of all the monotheistic religions to meet with their brothers in faith" in Saudi Arabia, in order to foster "respect among the religions."
King Abdullah's initiative is excellent and extremely positive. A conference of open
King Abdullah and sincere dialogue between representatives of the three Abrahamic traditions can only be a step forward. My only concern is that the diversity of Islamic opinion be fully represented, but indications from the Saudi kingdom are that King Abdullah recognizes the negative impact of Wahhabism, Deobandism, and other fundamentalist sects on the future of Islam. I hope that Jewish and Christian representatives will participate in such a conference with confidence in their own revelations, and will not give way to "politically correct" accommodations with Wahhabism.
Jewish and Christian representatives should understand that mainstream Islamic tradition respects the People of the Book and expects their teachers and other advocates to present their viewpoint in a learned and insightful manner, and not to engage in nonsensical rhetoric intended to improve relations with the Muslims by offering empty compliments. Jews and Christians who meet with and enter into dialogue with Muslims should do so from a position of self-respect, not of self-abasement. I hope and expect that Muslims at such an event will conduct themselves similarly.
![]() |
Seven Seekers Describe Their Personal Paths to New Faith |
|
| A Sikh, a Buddhist, a Jew, a Muslim, and a Christian Scientist walk into a bar... | ||
by Helen Jupiter, March 13, 2008 |
||
According to a recent survey, Americans are very likely to leave the faith into which they were born and brought up -- if you count shifts from one Protestant denomination to another, a whopping 44 percent of Americans have changed their religion. Our post about this a few weeks ago sparked some serious commentary, and ultimately inspired us to assemble a collection of American conversion stories. Below you'll find personal accounts of conversions to Judaism, Sikhism, Buddhism, Christian Science, and Islam. If you or someone you know has a conversion story to share, add to this collection in comments!
Torah
Teresa Lane, United Methodist to Jewish: I converted to Judaism almost
four years ago. I did a conservative conversion through a relatively
formal class. As the only “non-coupled” person in the class, I was a
bit of a novelty. It was kind of great, as it gave me an automatic air
of sincerity, but it also meant that I got a lot of the question, “And
why exactly are you converting?”
So here’s my answer: I grew up in a
very Jewish area of St. Louis; I may be off on my stats, but I think my
high school was about 40% Jewish. Then I went to a college, where,
let’s just say, Hillel is a big deal. All my life most of my friends
have been Jewish, so I felt somehow connected to Judaism in that way.
Even though I grew up in the Midwest, I have very little concept of a
world where Jews are an actual minority. Not long after college I dated
a guy who brought me to a seder, and I was hooked (on Judaism; the guy
didn’t last). I picked up books on Judaism (Heschel’s The Sabbath, Kushner’s To Life!)
and decided to take an “Introduction to Judaism” class. The idea was
just to learn some more, not necessarily to convert. But, to be honest,
that statement about "learning some more" kind of sounds like BS now,
even to me. I must have been searching for more than I consciously realized.
Four years after entering the mikveh, I’m not really observant. Which,
it seems, a fair number of people find funny. All the same, there's a
lot I love about Judaism. The way it celebrates life, the attitude of
stumbling through life as best we can, trying to make it better, but
having that mostly be enough. Even “Jewish guilt” (though because I
don’t have a Jewish mother I may not be qualified to use that phrase)
is so different from the Christian guilt of my adolescence that it’s
hugely refreshing to me. I love the rituals of Judaism - lighting
candles, hearing the same prayer over and over at services, the seder.
I find them beautiful and comforting, even if they are still sort of
foreign and a little bit stressful for me. Perhaps most of all I love
the sense of belonging to a community, or at least knowing it’s there
should I choose to become more involved.
I am sometimes jealous of people who grew up as Jews, who know all the
little things that Jews just do, that they don’t teach you in a
conversion class. But sometimes I know that I'm lucky to be without the
baggage of memories of being shushed in services and dragged to Hebrew
school; that I consequently have a unique opportunity to appreciate all
the beauties of Judaism.
Daibutsu Buddha
Brad Warner, Non-practicing Protestant to Zen Buddhist Monk: I'm not sure I ever really "converted" to Buddhism, because before I got into Buddhism I had no real religious affiliation at all.
When I was a kid I lived in Nairobi, Kenya for three years. There were
a lot of Indian people and Indian culture around there. One of my dad's
best friends was Indian and when we'd go over to his house I used to
see all the paintings of Krishna and stuff. His wife and kids were
vegetarians, which is something I'd never encountered back in Akron,
Ohio, where I was from. I found all that fascinating. Later on when we
returned to Ohio and I got to be a teenager, I started thinking a lot
about death. That's what teenagers do, I suppose. But I had extra
reasons since two of my aunts were, at the time, dying of an incurable
genetic disease that I stood a good chance of inheriting myself.
I looked into Christianity but it all seemed so cheap and tawdry and
fake. I was interested in Judaism as well, but it seemed too closed to
outsiders. In college I looked for some kind of Indian religion to
study, thinking that might be a more pure path. I could only find one
course available and it was Zen Buddhism. I had no interest at all in
Buddhism and would have taken absolutely any other Indian religion if
it had been offered. But Zen Buddhism was all they had, so I took it.
The first day of the first class the teacher read this piece called the
Heart Sutra, which contains the line "form is emptiness, emptiness is
form." When I heard that I was hooked. I had no idea what the Hell it
was supposed to mean, but I knew it was right. I'm still trying to work
out what that line means...
The Golden Temple
Sat Daya Singh, Roman Catholic to Sikh: I
was raised Roman Catholic, and was first exposed to the Sikh path early in life, when
a preschool friend was a Sikh. My next major contact was while living
in New Mexico for a few months in 2005.
Since I do not view Sikhism in purely religious terms, I do not feel
like I ever left my previous religion. I look at my adoption of a Sikh
lifestyle as an upgrade. Sikhism is not a religious-based dogma. The principles of a Sikh lifestyle (uncut hair, a vegetarian diet,
constant meditation on God, selfless service, etc...) are used to
illuminate the path to happiness. They are markers on a map up the
mountain where the peak is unshakeable serenity. By being stronger in
myself, my presence can help others.
My previous lifestyle was not bringing me
as much serenity as I sought. I became much more stable and strong as
a Sikh. It felt like upgrading from DOS to Mac OS/X. The most difficult part of my "upgrade" has been my dealings with my
family. I can only compare it to experiences I have read of homosexuals
coming out of the closet. Initially they were furious, and I can often
sense their bewilderment in conversation.
Quran Stephen Suleyman Schwartz, Unaffiliated/Protestant to Muslim: A little more than a year ago, on February 19, 2007, I published a statement in Jewcy about my road to Islam.
I have been asked to restate the story of my becoming Muslim in a
simpler form. For many people in the U.S., it is obviously shocking to
hear that someone with a “Jewish” family name became Muslim. (Elsewhere
it is typically assumed I am of German Christian background.) Jews who
react in this way often seem to forget that people with “Jewish” family
names may not be halakhically Jewish. In my case, my mother came from a
Protestant Christian family, and although my parents were leftist and
antireligious, the first faith of which I gained detailed knowledge was
Protestant Christianity.
I later explored Buddhism, Catholicism, and Judaism before becoming
Muslim; my journeys took the form of travel, reading, and study. But I
was not what we call in California a “shopper for God.” I was an
intellectual with religious beliefs, not a compulsive joiner seeking a
home. In my new book, The Other Islam: Sufism and the Road to Global
Harmony, which will appear at the end of summer 2008 from Doubleday, I
describe my encounter with the Jewish Kabbalah as a peak moment in my
spiritual development. But my introduction to Kabbalah--which is so
deeply influenced by Islamic mysticism or Sufism that it has been said
that Kabbalah is Sufism in Jewish garments--proved a bridge to Islam
for me.
My entry into Islam may be explained most basically as follows: the
Islamic conception of God is simpler than that in the other
monotheistic traditions; the Islamic path to God through Sufism is the
most direct. I love Christianity and Judaism but Islam is rigorous in
its rejection of anthropomorphism, i.e. equation of the form of the
Creator with the form of the human being. This embodies, to me, a
liberation of the mind. All the rest – the problems besetting the
sacred Jewish people because of their small numbers, the infection of
contemporary Islam with radicalism – are matters of human history, not
religion. I found in Islam a purity very close to that in Judaism, but
with a broader, more universal reach – Judaism for gentiles, as Saadiah
Gaon argued. And since I was born a gentile, this path, which may seem
more difficult to others but was simpler for me, beckoned. Finally, if
I may be forgiven a bit of immodesty – Christianity and Judaism have a
surfeit of modern intellectuals. Islam today needs intellectuals more
than clerics, demagogues, or academics. And so in Islam I found a
spiritual and rational place.
Star Of David
Paul Widen, Protestant to Jewish: A
few weeks ago I barged into the office of a shaliach that previously
had declined to take my case before the special committee at the
Ministry of Interior that decides who gets to convert (an illegal act,
I later learned [his declination, not my barging into his office]).
With his secretary as interpreter we were all sort of shouting for a
few minutes, which I guess is what it took to make them realize that
I'm serious and that I'm not giving up. However, they kept saying that
I didn't have enough to show for myself ("What, you've only davened
three times a day for six months?") and that my letters of
recommendation were insufficient. I demanded that this shaliach
see me again in a couple of months, at which time I assured him I'd
have more to show for myself (e.g.,Yeshiva studies). He told me OK, to
set up a meeting with the secretary. So the two of us went out of the
rabbi's/shaliach's office and into the hallway, where we continued
talking, and she asked, "What's the rush? Why don't you just wait for
six months and then come back?"
I was incredulous. "I'm 30. I want to
convert and get married and get on with my life." She wasn't convinced.
"The Moshiach might come," I said, and this teenage, national-service
excuse for a human being, started laughing at me. I got tears in my
eyes and I said, "What are you laughing at? You know it's true, you
know it's true." And I thought, "Wow, I almost believe this
myself."
"Credo quia absurdum" as the saying goes. "I believe because it is
absurd." To proclaim this impossibility, to demand this, to stay true
to this hope every day when nothing in the world seems to ever hint
that it will happen, that is how I see Judaism. Judaism tells me that
there is something wrong with the world, that it's broken on a
fundamental level. This appeals to me, because this is how I feel.
It is strange to long to be a part of religious community whose members
are completely indifferent to my longing: It's even perceived as a bit
suspicious, almost pathological. In one breath you can become a
Christian or a Muslim: A simple prayer and you're a gold member. In
Judaism, however, the potential proselyte is to be turned down thrice
before being accepted: Thrice is the door to be slammed shut in his
face. It's sort of like the movie Fight Club, where the candidates to
Tyler Durden's nihilistic revolutionary club "Project Mayhem" are forced
to stand at attention for three days while systematically being
ridiculed by him for even trying to be accepted. Or, in a more tasteful
metaphor, like Imre Kertesz's book Fateless, in which the Jewish
protagonist is ostracized by his fellow inmates at
the concentration camp because he doesn't speak Yiddish. "Di bist
nischt ka jid, d'bist a shaygets. You're not a Jew, you're a Gentile," Kertesz writes. "That day I felt that I was struck by the same awkwardness, the same
creeping insecurity that I remember from home, as if
I didn't meet the criteria of the ideal, in one word: a little bit as
if I were Jewish."
Christian Science Seal
Kelly Riley, Catholic to Christian Science: I was raised Catholic, the youngest of eight siblings. We all went to
Sunday school, we all went to catechism. At catechism they'd tell me
that I was bad, that I was going to go to hell, just that I was
inherently bad, and if you get hurt or sick, it's a punishment of some
kind.
My oldest brother is nearly 20 years older than me, so I was still very
young when he got married. They were Catholic also. His first child was
born healthy, but his second child got very sick when he was one.
Doctors were baffled, and despite taking the child everywhere, no one
could heal him. Getting desperate, my sister-in-law remembered someone
from her college days--one of her roommates--who was a Christian
Science practitioner. She tracked her down and said, "My child is going
to die in six months, can you help me?" Her old roommate, who was in
New York, said she could help. She flew out to Michigan, stayed with
them, and within a week she had healed the child. After that, my
brother and sister-in-law said, "That's it, we're turning to Christian
Science." My sister-in-law even became a practitioner. They had six
kids, raised them all in Christian Science, and they all turned out
super successful.
I remember times when I was a kid and I would get ill, and my
parents--even though they were Catholic--would send me to my brother's
house. My father just knew that something was good there. My
sister-in-law would tell me that I was good, that God loved me. She was
purely positive, which was confusing because it contradicted everything
I'd been taught in Catechism and Sunday School. It was really hard to
comprehend.
Eventually I grew up and moved out to California. I was in a horrible
relationship--I was 22, living the good life, very rich in a big
mansion, but I was living in hell. I was getting beaten by my husband.
We're talking broken arms, broken legs--you name it, I've had it all. I
had watched one of my sisters transform her life through Christian
Science as well, and I would call her, locked in the bathroom after a
beating, and she'd heal me over the phone.
Finally I said to myself, "That's it, I'm going to do it." My brother
flew out, helped me get out of that marriage, and I came to Christian
Science.
Jewish Symbols
Michelle Golland, Psy.D., Catholic to Jewish: I was raised Catholic. We were religious when I was younger but even
when my family really stopped attending church, I continued on after
college. I even found a Catholic church when I moved away from home and
up to San Francisco. In a way I was searching for a community but it
seemed not to be found for me within Catholicism. I loved the pageantry
and ritual but could not find comfort or peace in the dogma and lack of
debate.
As a sophomore in college I started to explore different spiritual
paths. I finally settled on Judaism because I felt inspired and
challenged at the same time. I realized that while in Catholicism I was
"being good" to get into heaven, Judaism was about "doing good" to
experience "heaven on earth." I respond to the focus on the present, which is
grounded in tradition and ritual.
My parents were supportive of my interest in and eventual conversion to Judaism, in part because they loved my boyfriend,
Michael, who was Jewish. They were happy I was going to marry a "nice
Jewish boy." This was important, because I tended to bring home more
rebellious guys that frankly scared them a little. The struggle I have
with my family of origin is not specifically religious, but more an issue of making different life choices overall. Inviting them in and creating a sense of inclusion was essential to fostering a happier
relationship with them.
I have been a Jew for sixteen years. Soon I will have been a Jew longer than I was a Catholic. I actually look forward to that
year, I guess because I believe I was waiting to discover my Jewishness
my whole life. Who I am as a person, the things I long for, how I fight
authority, the way I question things and want answers, the experience of having a personal connection
with God which requires no middle man—whether that is Jesus or a
Priest—feels at home and honored in Judaism.
I was always the child in
the room pointing out the big elephant that nobody wanted to see.
My catechism teacher—who finally kicked me out of class for asking too
many inappropriate questions about birth control and abortion—would
agree I am a much better Jew, because I failed miserably as a
faith-filled Catholic. My spiritual awakening within Judaism has many
layers that are still being discovered. The Torah for me is one big
storybook that I choose to attach myself too. I gain insight, wisdom
and hope from the reading of these stories, which are so beautifully
filled with human flaws and struggles. As a Jew I don’t believe that
any one religion or spiritual path is better or “true,” it’s just
personal.
Is Today's "Letter of Harmony" A Sign of Emerging Islamic Reformation? |
|
| Baby steps are adding up to substantive change | |
by Ali Eteraz, February 26, 2008 |
|
There is an emerging Islamic Counter-Reformation -- an attempt led by traditional Islamic scholars to try and wrest authority back from demagogues and terrorists.
In the late 90's and early parts of this century, Islamic clerics saw people like Bin Laden trying to wrest authority from them, the clerics came together and coalesced. With backing from the King of Jordan, they issued the historic Amman Message whose purpose was to try and eliminate the idea
Ripe for reinterpretation? of takfir among Muslims. Takfir is the practice, by one Muslim, of casting another Muslim out of Islam (which then makes it permissible to attack the apostate). It had long been strictly forbidden by traditional clerics, but was revived by 20th century Islamists in order to make it easier for them to cleanse their opponents. Therefore, an attack against takfir was powerful attack against extremism (and, as I argued, an important forerunner of a more embracing view of apostates). Many of these scholars are trying to set up a centralized House of Fatwas which would only permit the power of fatwa to those who are adequately qualified.
Emboldened by the positive reception of the Amman Message, last year Islamic clerics then sent a conciliatory letter to the Pope. The gesture was received warmly by Pope Benedict (coming off his own controversial comments regarding Islam).
Seeing that conciliation and dialogue were beneficial (and getting picked up in the media), traditional clerics pressed ahead. Recently in India, 20,000 clerics declared terrorism un-Islamic. The act is significant because it comes out of the ultra-orthodox Deoband school. Also recently, the Department of Religious Affairs in Turkey, began to cull objectionable hadith narrations.
Today, Muslim clerics sent a "letter of harmony" to Jewish leaders as well, yet another positive development. It gets past the geo-political discussion and focuses squarely on matters of faith -- as many of us have long encouraged Muslim leaders to do. It says in part:
There is more in common between our religions and peoples than is known to each of us. It is precisely due to the urgent need to address such political problems as well as acknowledge our shared values that the establishment of an inter-religious dialogue between Jews and Muslims in our time is extremely important.
Failure to do so will be a missed opportunity. Memories of positive historical encounters will dim and the current problems will lead to an increasing rift and more common misunderstandings between us.
The initiative is being advanced by Akbar S. Ahmed, a former high-commissioner of Pakistan to Britain, and a well regarded public intellectual among Muslims.
This letter seems to be an initiative led by Western Muslim leaders. It has not come out of the Muslim majority world. In other words, it is just one baby step rather than anything historic. However, it does bode well as it comes on the heels of a declaration in Tikkun magazine by a prominent traditional cleric in America that holocaust denial is un-Islamic. The mere enunciation of such ideas is positive, as it arms clerics in other parts of the world to have precedent they can call upon.
Not only that, but many of the more conciliatory advances of traditional scholars around the world have had significant connection with Muslim leaders in the West. The pluralist and inter-faith Islam being developed in the Western world (as well as in India) seems to be going into the Muslim world and emboldening the pluralist minorities there. This, actually, has been a longstanding trend within Islamic history. The Islamic "fringes" -- i.e. the parts geographically closest to non-Muslims -- have always produced the more universalist and syncretic versions of Islam (i.e. Islamic Spain, Bosnia, and India) -- ironically, this historical trend directly contradicts Huntington's assertion about Islam's bloody borders; in fact, its actually the other way around.
If there is a hope for a reduction to anti-Semitism among Muslims, there will have to be more letters of harmony until Arab, Iranian and Indo-Pak scholars feel emboldened enough to take a stand on the matter as well. However, there will also have to be genuine scholarly works that deconstruct the various anti-Semitic interpretations that scholars have assigned to Jews in the past. An honest and modern interpretation of texts is as necessary as conciliatory letters.
Bad Friday: The Pope Still Wants to Convert Jews |
|
| For Jews, multiculturalism means learning not to freak out at Christianity | |
by Roi Ben-Yehuda, February 8, 2008 |
|
The Pope: An ancient prayer is causing modern controversy
A few years ago he pissed off Muslims around the world when he suggested that Islam was a religion of the sword. Today, Pope Benedict XVI has enraged the rest of the monotheistic family.
In a move that must have given both Ann Coulter and Mel Gibson hard-ons, the Pope has re-sanctioned an ancient Good Friday prayer which calls on God to illuminate the hearts of the Jews that they might recognize their savior Jesus Christ. To his credit, the Pope did choose to remove passages from the ancient Latin rite which referred to Jewish "blindness" and the need to "remove the veil from their hearts."
To the surprise of nobody, Jewish groups have got their knickers in a twist. The Italian Rabbinical Assembly has suspended its decades-long dialogue with the Church. And the Anti-Defamation League issued a statement which read:
"While we appreciate that some of the deprecatory language has been removed ... we are deeply troubled and disappointed that the framework and intention to petition God for Jews to accept Jesus as Lord was kept intact."
Walter Kasper, the Cardinal in charge of the Catholic Church's relations with Jews, has vigorously defended the Pope's decision. Kasper (who happens to be German) is perplexed by Jewish touchiness:
"I must say that I don't understand why Jews cannot accept that we can make use of our freedom to formulate our prayers. We think that reasonably this prayer cannot be an obstacle to dialogue because it reflects the faith of the Church and, furthermore, Jews have prayers in their liturgical texts that we Catholics don't like."
To those of us less naive about Jewish sensitivities, it is obvious that reintroducing this prayer into the liturgy would reopen old wounds. It harkens us back to a time when Christians looked at Jews the way Tom Cruise looks at a car accident.
| Blogging Birthright: Day 4, or Falling in Love with Israel at Masada | |
| Jewcy contributor Amy Odell blogs her ten days in Israel. | |
|
by Amy Odell, February 1, 2008
|
|
Our Tour Guide Shows Us What Masada Used to Look LikeWe wake at 4:45 to climb Masada for sunrise. It’s a bit cloudy so the sun isn’t as spectacular as I'd hoped, but it's spectacular enough to inspire me to snap about 7,000 pictures of it. I’m supremely irked by the fact that our counselors choose the exact 30 minutes during which the sun slowly emerges into blazing glory as the perfect time to lead songs and prayers. I routinely tune them out and am one of two or three people who completely ignore their request to put cameras away at the start of the service. I just can’t help myself: Here I am, standing on the edge of a cliff overlooking the Dead Sea, the lowest point on Earth, and the Judean desert—the likes of which I’ve only seen in nature documentaries. The sunlight is coloring the cliff faces rich shades of red and orange, and I’m supposed to turn my back and listen to singing I don’t understand or give a shit about? I don’t think so.
We spend about three hours on top of Masada. Though I can’t adjust to the beauty of these surreal surroundings, it’s our tour guide Offer’s lecture that really makes my visit memorable. He tells us the story of Masada in cliff-hanging detail (no pun intended) as he leads us through the ruins. I'm surrounded by remnants of a fabulous palace inhabited by a group of Jews called the Zealots 2,000 years ago. Descending Into the Zealots Ancient Water SystemPositioned at the edge of a cliff in the middle of the desert, the palace offered views of approaching enemies, a sophisticated water system, glorious balconies, and even a sauna. Life was dandy here until the Romans came and set up twelve camps at the bottom of the cliff, surrounding the Zealots, ready to conquer. The Zealots could either fight or surrender. They talked it over and reasoned if they fought, they’d lose and die. If they surrendered, they’d watch their wives get raped, be enslaved, and die. Since death was inevitable, they decided to die with dignity by committing mass suicide. They killed the women first, since the worst thing for a woman is to watch her child die. Then they killed the children, and then the men killed each other.
The account is probably an inflated, idealized version of history, but I’m not really thinking about that, because it was a good-ass story and I’m in awe of it. I recognize that I will never forget Offer’s final point, partly because he asked us to remember, and partly because of the natural phenomenon he demonstrates at the last stop on the mountain. We’re overlooking the valley where many Zealots supposedly plunged to their death. We face a smooth cliffside that looks like a paintbrush has freshly streaked it with burnt oranges and grayish browns.
Echoing Cliffs Around Masada“I’m going to tell you a phrase in Hebrew I never want you to forget,” Offer says. He teaches us the phrase. “Now, we’re going to shout these words as loudly as we can over this valley.” We face out and shout with all our might. Even I join in. A few seconds later our words echo back per-fect-ly. It’s like a Bizarro Birthright group is shouting back at us. We do it again. And again. “It means: Masada shall never fall again,” Offer says. “I want you to remember it because it means let us never have to choose between death and death. Let Israel never have to choose between death and death.”
At the end of the day, I want this place to be my “homeland” because I’m so amazed by what I've seen. Though I can’t say I feel a connection yet, I can say I’m finally thrilled and delighted to be here.
Previously: Day 3, or Judaism Vs. Feminism At The Western Wall
Ha, wasn't it humiliating for Scientology when that clip of Tom Cruise being all wild-eyed and talking about orgs and DPs and whatnot surfaced online? Now everyone will think Scientologists are crazy! Good thing no embarrassment like that could ever befall the Jews.
Oh, wait. Oops. It turns out that Hebrew Hammer writer/director Jon Kesselman made a top secret Jewish indoctrination video that makes Tom look saneish. Whether he's curing cancer, curing 9/11, or just walking on water, for Jon Kesselman, it's all about KJW: Keep Judaism Working. Oy.
| Steinhardt, Birthright Israel, and "Common Judaism" | |
|
by Abe Greenwald, October 3, 2007
|
|
There’s an article in today’s New York Sun about Taglit-Birthright Israel’s multi-million dollar initiative to build on its program of sending young Jews on free 10-day trips to Israel. The program as it stands is a pretty remarkable thing. Birthright Israel has sent almost 145,000 young adults to Israel since 2000. Here’s the new plan in a nutshell:
[T]he as-yet-unnamed initiative will build new, fully staffed Birthright Israel program offices in 17 American cities, where alumni would be able to choose from a menu of free subsidized programs including seminars, festivals, conferences, retreats, and trips back to Israel — or obtain seed grants to create programs of their own.
The idea is to extend the return traveler's excitement for Jewish life into their everyday world.
The post-trip rush of enthusiasm for Judaism has become legendary in Birthright Israel's seven short years. Studies by researchers at Brandeis University found that Birthright Israel participants are more likely to participate in Jewish events on their college campuses; more likely to want to learn Hebrew, and more likely to say they want to marry within the Jewish faith and raise Jewish children.
The Root of All Evil?
ABC’s Compass recently aired the documentary The Root of All Evil, featuring biologist Richard Dawkins and based on his latest bestseller The God Delusion. Dawkins is an unabashed atheist and makes no bones as to the purpose of his book and, by extension, of the TV series: to convert the believing reader/viewer to the prevalent rationalism of modern scientific thought.
![]() |
My Crush On Catholicism | |
| Thou shall not covet thy neighbor’s religion | ||
|
by Aaron Hamburger, August 8, 2007
|
||
Recently a lapsed Catholic friend confessed a serious case of religion envy—for the religion I happened to be born into. “I’ve always had a strong admiration for Judaism,” he told me. “If I had to choose any religion, it would be yours.” Ironically, I had a similar confession to make: I’d always felt the same way about the Catholic Church.
In an age when schoolchildren in the most goyish suburbs learn to sing “Dreidel, Dreidel, Dreidel” alongside “Silent Night,” when churches and synagogues engage in interfaith outreach, and where politicians regularly lump sharply contrasting belief systems together under the category of “faith,” it shouldn’t be surprising that religions can seem interchangeable. Especially when your own religion feels a bit lacking. Don’t like fasting on Yom Kippur? Why not try on Catholicism for size? Unhappy with the latest Pope? Drop by your neighborhood synagogue or mosque. But religious values aren’t a Chinese menu, where we can pick two from Column A and three from Column B to suit ourselves. In fact, the better metaphor here would be a delicately balanced house of cards; pull out one from the middle, and the whole thing comes crashing down.
Making Catholics want to be Jews since 1909: Isaiah BerlinAs my friend explained his high regard for Judaism, I realized that he was attracted to certain Jewish cultural traditions but didn’t realize how they fit into a larger philosophical framework. He had two reasons for his high regard for Judaism, beginning with our people’s famous penchant for heterodoxy. Unlike Catholicism, we have no Vatican that issues The Final Word which all Jews must follow. He also admired our tradition of scholarly debate: rabbis carrying on heated discussions long into the night, not to mention Jewish writers and intellectuals like Isaiah Berlin and Hannah Arendt carrying on that tradition in the secular culture. My friend found this refreshing compared with Catholicism, in which the word of God goes directly through the church to its adherents, with no room for questioning.
I found it difficult to recognize the religion he was describing. True, we lack a central authority, and our rabbis don’t hector us from the pulpit like stereotypically stern Irish priests. But then our rabbis don’t need to hector us, as the Jewish laity has more than ably fulfilled that role. Judaism emphasizes faith performed in the context of a community (which is why, in order to pray, you need the presence of ten adult males.) Step outside its accepted norms and you’ve got two choices: subject yourself to an earful about it from family, friends, and strangers, or walk away from the community.
And while there is a lot of debate in religious circles, I wouldn’t necessarily categorize it all as intellectual since it focuses mostly on matters of ritual rather than philosophy. (What’s so intellectual about a debate over whether it’s permissible to put sugar into tea or tea into sugar on Shabbat?) This reflects Judaism’s emphasis on practice over intent—the here-and-now over the metaphysical. Our leaders often find themselves absorbed in such profundities as the proper way to slit the throat of a chicken. In fact, most of our greatest intellectuals (Spinoza, Marx, Freud) were reacting against the grain of our religion, not with it. Compare this to Catholicism, which inspired St. Augustine, Thomas Aquinas, and Dante.
Beat that, Judaism: Notre Dame in ParisAnd that’s why, as I told my friend, I’ve long had a secret case of religion envy for Catholicism, with its emphasis on the soul, not rituals. Catholics have the freedom to live their daily lives as they see fit, because Catholicism has few rules governing the banalities of what to eat or what clothes to wear. Also, especially in contrast with Jews, Catholics have a much better knack for pageantry and decoration. Walk into any Catholic cathedral and then a Jewish synagogue; which space is more likely to inspire a state of awe and meditation conducive to prayer? Perhaps the chief source of my Catholic religion envy, though, is the ritual of confession. Imagine it, free therapy! For a Jew, what could be a bigger wet dream?
But as my friend quickly pointed out, Catholicism’s fetishization of the soul can become meaninglessly ritualistic in itself. Catholics can eat shrimp to their heart’s content, but their penalty for breaking the faith’s few key rules is rather extreme: an eternity in hell or a slightly shorter time in purgatory. As for Catholicism’s theatrical pageantry, it’s fun to look at occasionally, but after a while, it can all get a bit tacky, even gruesome. The point is not to inspire individual meditation, but mass conformance to Catholic dogma. And Confession isn’t a bit like therapy. The priests aren’t there to sympathize but merely to help you atone—all in all, a ritual as empty as the rabbi of a synagogue with over a thousand members shaking a congregant’s hand on Shabbat.
That’s when it hit me: Understanding someone else’s religion is like learning a language. You can’t just translate the words one-to-one. Rather, you have to begin by tackling the logic of the whole supporting system underneath.
100% halal: A kosher symbol on a soda bottleIt’s not just a question of Judaism and Catholicism, either. I find it lovely that many Muslims search for the kashrut symbol on non-meat products in American grocery stores because a kosher product is often also halal. Keeping kosher and eating halal, however, are hardly the same thing. In fact, one of the reasons kosher meat is not considered halal is that kashrut is based on the Jewish principles of cleanliness and the ethical treatment of animals. Halal rules incorporate these principles, but they privilege the uniquely Islamic value of submission to God’s will, which is why a prayer affirming the greatness of Allah must be uttered immediately preceding the animal’s slaughter.
Why do we feel the desire to mold unfamiliar religions to fit our own wishes and ideals? Maybe in an era of terrorism and armed conflict in the name of God, we want to comfort ourselves by affirming the notion that deep down we really are all the same. (We are, but our religions aren’t). For some of us, religion envy may be a symptom of a consumer society in which almost every product can be customized to fit each customer’s specific tastes. “Would you like your sandwich on whole wheat, foccacia, rye, white, country Tuscan, country Tuscan whole wheat, or country Tuscan whole wheat low-carb?” “Would you like your religion belief-centered, practice-centered, monotheistic, pantheistic, ritual-heavy, or ritual-lite?”
The more I hashed the matter out with my Catholic friend, the more it became clear that our religion envy came out of sadness, even regret. Just as children idealize their friends’ parents when their own parents seem not to understand them, we too idealized each other’s faiths (and denigrated our own) because of our desire to correct what we saw as the flaws of the religions we’d been born into. Religion envy is a band-aid, but it doesn’t quite fit over the wound.
Inscribed "I had a blast at Benjy's Bar Mitzvah": The pope's kippahFor example, my friend stumped me with the following un-Jewish question about Judaism: “What happens if you don’t go to synagogue? Is that a sin? Does that mean you’re going to hell?” He’d been turned off from Catholicism after being told that skipping church on Sundays was a mortal sin.
But Judaism addresses the subject of hell only in passing, with scant detail. For all Judaism’s rules, our emphasis is not on doing right to receive a reward or avoid a punishment, but on doing right for its own sake. Perhaps the best answer I could come up with was, in true Jewish form, another question: “Does the Pope wear a yarmulke?”
Similarly, in all my questions about Catholicism’s emphasis on spirituality the name “Jesus Christ” never came up. In fact, I was surprised when my friend explained that you can’t be a good Catholic without affirming your belief in Christ as the Son of God who once walked on Earth and died for our sins. “But what if, even if you’re not sure Jesus was divine, you follow all of his teachings to the letter?” I asked. Nope, not good enough. For Catholics, faith in Jesus’ godly status is a prerequisite. I’d been unable see this dogmatic aspect of Catholicism because I was too busy admiring the religion’s spirituality as an antidote for Jewish dogma.
If we must accept the notion that different faiths are indeed fundamentally different, where does that leave those of us who’d like to promote interfaith understanding, particularly now, when we’re so frightened of people who passionately believe things that are antithetical to our own belief systems? A false understanding of how other religions work is just as bad as no understanding. Instead of promoting untruths like “we all believe in the same God, just with different names,” we should approach the faith of the Other with a completely open, almost childlike sense of wonder and bewilderment. In other words, we should be adult enough to say something as juvenile as, “Wow, your god used to think if you eat meat on Fridays you’d go to hell? Interesting, but I don’t understand that at all. Tell me more.”
| This is what happens when a Jewish foodie fundraises | |
|
by ArielaPelaia, August 7, 2007
|
|
As a foodie who also happens to be a graduate student at the Jewish Theological Seminary, I suppose it's no surprise that I often combine my passions for Judaism and food. Memories of the Great Synagogue in Florence, Italy are paired with recollections of a nearby trattoria, with images of horseshoe-arched entrances living alongside equally potent memories of truffled pasta. A similar melding occurs when I teach, and of course, when I write on my blog, where Jewish history finds its way into posts about beignets or whatever else is cooking in my kitchen.
The latest manifestation of this habit? A cookbook raffle intended to raise money for the 2007 Jewish Environmental Bike Ride. The ride is sponsored by Hazon whose food team I joined this past May, and proceeds from the ride are used to fund a wide array of worthy projects: 10 organic farms around the US, an organic farming initiative in Israel, and a food curriculum for Jewish day schools, which teaches children about a vast array of important topics surrounding Judaism, nutrition and the environment. These are just a few of the initiatives funded by the ride and I wanted to contribute to the cause - but what could I do?
70 Prizes. One Amazing Cause.That's when a crazy idea hit me. As a foodblogger who has reviewed cookbooks on her site, I've been in touch with publishing houses like Hyperion and HarperCollins - what if I asked them to donate books to a raffle that would raise funds for the NY Ride? I wasn't sure they would go for it but it never hurts to ask, so I shot a few emails their way and, to my surprise, they were eager to support the cause. Now thanks to donations from Hyperion, HarperCollins, Ten Speed Press, Penguin and Chronicle Books I'm holding a cookbook raffle on my site, Baking and Books, with more than 70 prizes for raffle participants to win. Tickets cost only $5 with free tickets being thrown into the mix for donations of $25 (1 free ticket) and $50 (2 free tickets). The raffle is a fun way to support Jewish education while also increasing awareness about the environment and important food issues. Check it out.
| Jews, Children of Intermarriage, and Neo-Nazi Shemale Pricks | |
|
by Joey Kurtzman, July 19, 2007
|
|
Yesterday, Michael kindly leapt to my defense against those who assert that I'm unentitled to speak on Jewish issues, what with my being not only a "neo-Nazi shemale prick," but, less forgivably, a non-Jewish neo-Nazi shemale prick.
Michael volunteered that I'm "100% halachically Hebrew," and he’s probably right about that. Still, my great-grandmother—the halakhically relevant one—was named Mary and was illiterate in Yiddish. I assume Mary was Jewish, but there seems cause to wonder, and I really can’t be bothered to find out. For anyone who places importance on such things as matrilineal succession, I encourage you to operate from the assumption that my mother is Margaret Thatcher.
And isn't that the point? We am ha-ares are so incurious about this stuff, so cavalier about life's BIG questions such as the Jewishness of one’s mother’s mother’s mother’s mother. It's really not much of a surprise if, as one commenter said, some ultra-Orthodox will no longer drink wine prepared by secular Jews. How can they be sure?
Michael also says "For the record, Joey's reference to "mongrel" or "FrankenJews" in his dialogue with Jack Wertheimer applied to only a few of us at Jewcy who were born of virgin Gentile mothers (myself included)." Actually, I did not intend terms such as Frankenjew to apply only to those whose mothers are not Jewish, or to children of intermarriage generally. I regret that I seem to have left myself open to that interpretation.
As I said to Jack Wertheimer in my second e-mail, “I don’t believe intermarriage is the cause of all this turmoil, but rather a consequence…your enemy is not intermarriage, but the pluralistic, endlessly permeable culture of the modern American city.” As an example of my own Frankenjew “patrimony,” I mentioned my high school experiences at a Korean Baptist Bible study, rather than anything about the diversity of my family. That’s because my point was that it’s our “polyglot, postmodern American creole culture,” rather than our ancestry, that makes for “Jewish-American mongrels” or “Frankenjews.” It’s a culture we share with people from an endless array of backgrounds, and in which our worldview is shaped by all sorts of non-Jewish influences, even as we also retain Jewish influences and connections.