Wed, Jul 09, 2008

User login

TAG:

Jewish Renewal

FIRST PERSON
The Ish Factor
How Ram Dass, Genesis, and the New York Times crossword puzzle taught me to like myself

 

 

What was I thinking? I’d agreed to do stand-up at a “Faith Jam” at an Islamic Temple. The show brought together the prayers, music, and comedy of Muslims, Christians, and Jews. And I was the Jew.

But I didn’t think of myself as a Jew, much less the Jew. I thought of myself as a yogi who grew up Jew-ish. Which was like being a Jew but a lot more vague. I felt vaguely oppressed. Vaguely alienated. Vaguely like having a nosh. A nosh, the quintessential Jewish meal, is not even a snack. A nosh is an open bag of chips you stick your hand into every time you pass through the kitchen. Or take kibbitzing. It’s not a conversation about something specific. It’s just talking. Kibbitzing is constant if you’re Jewish, even in synagogue, which, by the way, is like church except it usually has a removable wall that can make the room bigger or smaller. Depending. A vaguely sized room.

A Vaguely-Sized Meal: Baked means it's healthyA Vaguely-Sized Meal: Baked means it's healthyI always envied my ic friends. Catholics, so strict and clear. Confessing every little thing, then total absolution. Even agnostics were clear—about not knowing. I envied ists too. Taoists, Maoists, Buddhists, Baptists. Clear and strong and fisty. Not slippery and fishy like isheys.

I was an ish who longed to be an ist or an ic. But I was never comfortable with ans: Christians. Americans. Republicans. There’s something scary to me about an an. Almost too clear, too “I am.” So declarative and knowing. So certain that they believe. Which made me uncomfortable.

Maybe because I am Jewish. Judaism is the only religion that doesn’t require you to believe in anything. And belief was like an elective my family hadn’t registered for. It never came up. Morality came up. Kindness came up. What we would have for brunch frequently came up. But these things didn’t make me Jewish any more than believing in God would have. The Jewish God would like you to believe in him, but it isn’t required. Possibly because he is within you, literally in your DNA, so he is you. Or possibly because he is so complete he doesn’t need you. Which would be very Tom Cruise of him.

Then, in the midst of a walking nervous breakdown, I found myself in yoga. The ultimate goal of yoga is to still the mind in order to connect with “unbound consciousness,” but it’s not a religion. You don’t have to believe in unbound consciousness to connect with it, the same way you don’t have to believe in air to breathe it. But you can’t be a passive yogi; you do have to practice.

That Speedo Is a Little Ishy: Bikram Choudhury of Bikram yogaThat Speedo Is a Little Ishy: Bikram Choudhury of Bikram yogaIn order to practice, I had to figure out what kind of yogi I was. I started by figuring out what kind of yogi I wasn’t. First, I wasn’t a Bikram yogi. Bikram’s the hot yoga. The yoga where you do exactly the same poses, in exactly the same order, at exactly the same room temperature every single practice. Which just seems fascistic. And “fascistic” is an ic and an ist which is just too much for an ish like me.

For a while I was doing ashtanga—the Madonna yoga—but I had to break up with ashtanga after a debilitating hamstring injury sent me to dozens of healers, including a Chinese acupuncturist who told me, “Jewish girls, so spoiled. Better never have baby, you can’t take the pain.” Oh we can take it, I told her. But we take it with a lot of whining and noshing.

Finally I found the therapeutically helpful, and very joyful, anusura. After the injury healed, I decided it had been a blessing, because otherwise I might not have found this yoga—which I loved. And then I got annoyed. Why couldn’t something bad just be bad? This ambivalence resembled the most ishy part of my Jewishness—to never accept an idea or event at face value. Why does bad also have to be good? And when there is something good, why am I always suspiciously looking for what’s bad? It’s so Jewish!

But being the Jew had to involve more than just this ishiness. So I tried the process of elimination to figure out what kind of Jew I was. Orthodox? Too orthodox. Conservative? Too conservative. Hassidic? Not a good fit with the yoga. I grew up as a Bagel Jew but now, post Atkins, that’s out. I do get a lot of Jewish e-mail, so I’m kind of a Digital Jew, but that seems too lonely. Then online I ran into the Jewish Renewal movement. I was intrigued. I love new things! Even, despite all its goofiness, the New Age.

Chichen ItzaChichen ItzaI’m a New Age Jew, I said to myself, trying it out. I liked the picture. One where Sh’mas and sun salutations peacefully coexist. But it also felt kind of schizophrenic. The New Age guru Ram Dass wrote a book called Be Here Now. Post-Holocaust Jews say “never forget.” Be here now; never forget. Be here now; never forget. What if I turned it around? Never forget that you’re here now! I could be comfortable with that as my slogan.

And I could put something to remind me of it on my altar, which, I admit, is just an intention away from being a shelfful of tchotchkes. What is a tchotchke anyway? Kind of sentimental, kind of decorative, kind of useful, kind of dusty. Dust itself is very ishy. Somewhat dirty, a bit ethereal, downright schmutzy. A mysterious substance that’s made of everything.

That’s not a bad description of me, either. I’m a moon-calendar-living, tantric-yoga-doing, numerology-system-using, six-sensory-perceiving, non-genetically-modified-food-eating, Ganesh- and Shiva-worshipping, witch-trial-remembering, conscious-of-in-and-out-breathing, chakra-energizing, bell-playing, angel-card-picking, I-Ching-throwing, Daily-Ohm-and-Daily-Guru (as well as Daily Candy) email-getting, mantra-singing, yantra-looking, haiku-writing, subtle-body-tuning, thought-is-action-thinking, conspiracy-theory-believing, astrology-with-a-grain-of-salt-reading, vortexes-in-Sedona-vacationing, pendulum-swinging, hum-hearing, love-living, truth-seeking, third-eye-seeing, meridian-aligning, Christ-loving Jew. A “Type A” free spirit, working hard to let the wind blow me where it will.

I'd somehow been blown back to Judaism, and it seemed only right to reread Genesis, where it all began. I picked up the 1985 translation by The Jewish Publication Society, and discovered the most widely known translation of Genesis is pretty far off. One reason is that the original is only written in consonants. The vowels are all conjecture. Like my name might be Beth or Bath. Or Both.

And in this new translation, at the end of the first day it says, “An evening and a morning, a first day”. Not the first day. A first day. Kind of vague. But kind of great. Great in the “it’s always a new beginning” way. In the “we can’t really ever know the actual beginning” way. In the “the only real beginning is the beginning of beginningness” way.

It's a Particle, It's a Wave: A bubble chamber used in the 1970s to study particle physicsIt's a Particle, It's a Wave: A bubble chamber used in the 1970s to study particle physicsDiscovering Genesis's ishiness was comforting, but with the Faith Jam looming, I found myself still picking at my own ishiness like food at someone’s shivah. I wasn’t hungry, but there it was. Finally, I did what I always do when I’m trying to figure out something big. I put my subconscious on mull and took out a Sunday New York Times crossword puzzle. One clue had me stumped. “–like,” three letters. First letter i. Ill? Ion? Imp? Ink? Ish? Ish!-like” is ish. I laughed out loud, because how often are you on an ish-quest when ish is an answer in the NYT crossword puzzle? Like never. And this puzzle was explicitly making the connection, which I’d been missing, between the idea of like, which I love, to ish, which I don’t.

I’d forgotten about like. I love like because it doesn’t imply uncertainty; it implies comparison. It’s two things at the same time. Like came into the English language in synchronicity with particle physics, which says that particles aren’t really things at all, but “tendencies to exist.” They aren’t things, they are like things. Particles are ishy.

And as scientists made this discovery, like found its way into the English idiom. Like, it’s just blowing my mind that particles are like…ish.

And then I got it. Ish is a true expression of non-duality. It’s something and not something at the same time. Ish was what I was trying to understand in all my yoga classes. In all my meditation work, in all my hours at the Bodhi Tree Bookstore. Ish is it! And I felt vaguely excited, vaguely illuminated, vaguely like having a nosh. And utterly, specifically Jewish.

***

Related in Jewcy: Tamar Fox likes yoga. Also, she can kick your ass.

Related elsewhere: Listen to Beth Lapides perform a version of this story, alongside more Jewish comedy, at Un-Cabaret at Audible.com.


Secular Israelis Seek Jewish Tradition, Belief in God Not Required

 

Religion in Israel: Too black and white?Religion in Israel: Too black and white?It may only take an hour to get from Jerusalem to Tel Aviv (provided your bus doesn’t break down), but the two often feel more like different planets than neighboring cities. In Israel, the animosity between secular and Orthodox is palpable and growing, but according to an article in yesterday’s J-Post, the emerging Jewish Renewal movement is targeting even the most “hard-core” secularists, and attempting to bring Jewish traditions back into modern Israeli life by finding the gray areas within religion.

The ambivalence about Judaism in Israel became clear to me one night as I sat drinking in an alleyway bar in Tel Aviv with my Israeli friend Omer. Omer has been studying abroad in Germany for the past few years, and admitted that he felt disconnected there, and had started attending a Friday night dinner with other Jewish students. “My father would disown me if he knew I was lighting Shabbat candles,” said Omer guiltily. “We come from a long line of staunch Tel Aviv atheists.”

In order to counteract this deep rooted aversion to religion, the Jewish Renewal movement (different from the 1960s American movement of the same name) takes a more flexible approach, focusing on ritual, tradition and spirituality rather than outright faith. While the term “secular synagogue” may seem like an oxymoron,to proponents of Jewish Renewal, it’s the basis of their ideology.

Dr. Asher Cohen, a senior lecturer at Bar-Ilan's Political Science Department who recently wrote a paper on the failure of the Reform Movement to muster a significant following in Israel, said the movement lacked many of the drawbacks of Reform Judaism.

"First of all, there is no God," said Cohen. "Jewish Renewal is not a religion. So it does not turn off adamantly secular people."

Though the Jewish Renewal leaders identify their movement as distinctly Israeli, it’s hard not to sense that the trend mirrors the ever evolving definition of American Jewish identity. The search for cultural connections has taken many Americans beyond their local congregation or JCC. It is the reason why Jewcy exists, why small alternative congregations like Romemu are springing up across the country, and why birthright is quickly becoming the new bar mitzvah. For many, the search for meaning no longer revolves around the existence of God; it's about the need to find a comfortable, inclusive community.

 


 

Day 4: Is Jewish Renewal the Next Step in Spirituality, or Boomer Narcissism?

Haunted by the ghost of Timothy Leary

From: Arthur Waskow
To: Daniel Bronstein
Subject: We must learn to live with power

Daniel,

If I repeat myself, it’s because I feel unheard and caricatured.

A new Judaic paradigm will not require us to abandon all elements of the older paradigms. Of course “Love your neighbor” from Torah (that’s Biblical Judaism) and Hillel’s interpretation of it (Rabbinic Judaism) remain valuable. Just as Hillel used what came from a previous paradigm, so can we. And we do.

But crucial elements of an old paradigm can become rigid and deadly. A major example: sacrificialPointed to a New Judaic Paradigm: MaimonidesPointed to a New Judaic Paradigm: Maimonides offerings at the Temple. Maimonides taught that we dropped the sacrifices because we grew more mature and didn’t need them. They were regressive, childish. We needed a new paradigm.

I am surprised that you seem unsure whether Rabbinic Judaism was a new paradigm, a form of Judaism quite different from Biblical Judaism.

I am especially surprised that you scoff at the idea that Rabbinic Judaism presupposes that the Jewish people do not have and cannot exercise political power.

With the Bar Kokhba rebellion, Rabbi Akiba made an attempt to acquire politico-military power and independence for the Jewish people. Even though the rabbis thought that Akiba was an amazing teacher, they wrote Bar Kokhba out of the sacred history and downplayed the Maccabees precisely to prevent bids for political power, which had proved so disastrous.

Two millennia later, the Jews now have power. And because the rabbis had so little experience in exercising it, Rabbinic Judaism cannot guide us in how an Israeli Army or an AIPAC should behave. We must draw from Torah to create a kind of Judaism appropriate to our new reality—just as the rabbis once drew on a few lines of Hosea and Isaiah and Hannah in order to change Judaism’s focus from animal sacrifice to prayer.

Another example: the rabbis explicitly gave up on the Jubilee Year practice of redistributing land and letting it rest, saying this applied only in the Land of Israel, and only when the majority of the Jewish people lived there. As a result, the only “environmental” concept in Rabbinic Judaism is Bal Tashchit, a very weak way of protecting the earth.

This made sense for an era when the Jewish people had no way of making “land policy” or what we now call “environmental policy,” because they had no political power in the Land of Israel or any other land. But now we have both the need and the power to work with other communities toward healing the Earth. There are hints of what to do in some aspects of Biblical Judaism, but almost none in Rabbinic teaching. We need a new paradigm.

I do, however, want to celebrate one of your comments:

“In fact, given the horrendous job humans are doing these days in managing the world, I would welcome being bossed around by God, especially since we are ‘scorching’ the world.”

That’s precisely my point. You would welcome being bossed around by God, but it ain’t happening. Why keep addressing the God you know ain’t there, when you could be addressing the God who is—the mysterious but palpable YHWH, Breath of Life, joyful Breeze, shattering Hurricane, in-breath and out-breath. That metaphor for God might help you to not burn up the world, because you will feel its interwovenness with you. In contrast, God-as-King makes many Jews feel resentful, rebellious, as if they hold no stake in the world He owns.

As for the Orthodox community, I am not in the least surprised by their resurgence. They are reacting Reacting Against Modernity: The OrthodoxReacting Against Modernity: The Orthodoxagainst modernity by going back before it. Put women back in the bottle, other religions back in the bottle, the Earth back in the bottle. To do this, they need a lot more coercive power than their zeydes did. One hundred years ago, nobody had to beat up women to keep them from davening at the Western Wall. Now the genie is out of the bottle. It takes violence to put it back in.

So I see the extreme Orthodox as “Jewish restoration,” not continuity. This is very different from traditional Judaism.

Meanwhile, Renewal and Reconstructionism have pioneered the full involvement of gay and lesbian Jews. Conservative Judaism, long rigidly resistant, is following that path. Even Orthodoxy has its Trembling Before G-d, the film about gay Orthodox Jews that shook many people and opened many windows.

That is the rumbling sound of Rabbinic Judaism falling apart, a dozen bricks at a time rather than all at once. And it is the sound of a new home being built from many (not all) of the old bricks, along with some new hyper-insulated energy-conserving materials; and we are rearranging these raw materials into very new kinds of architecture.

Sh’ma!! To that sound, and to the breathing of the One! No branch of Judaism needs to vanish for the renewal of Torah and of the Jewish people, nor for a new paradigm to come into being.

Shalom,

Arthur

To: Arthur Waskow
From: Daniel Bronstein
Subject: Grass will Grow in Our Cheeks

Dear Arthur,

Sh’ma: I have heard you, and I have listened to you. As for caricature, I think you have been doing quite a bit of that in the ways you discuss “Rabbinic Judaism” and traditional conceptions of God.

A former icon of the boomer generation, Timothy Leary, spoke of “old” knowledge as “canned, static,” and “dead,” and of everyone becoming “his own Buddha.” I don’t want to caricature you, but Leary’s ghost echoes in some of your words.

Even so, your last letter is far more nuanced: It is heartening to see that you have shifted from theDoes his ghost haunt Jewish Renewal?: Timothy LearyDoes his ghost haunt Jewish Renewal?: Timothy Leary metaphor of “dead idols” to that of “old bricks.” That’s progress.

I am also heartened that you wrote that no “present branch of Judaism needs to vanish for the renewal of Torah and of the Jewish people.” I am not Orthodox and often dissent from its ideology and practice. At the same time, we should acknowledge that Jewish “Orthodoxy” is far from monolithic and is in fact probably the most diverse “stream” of Judaism. I have been enriched by many aspects of Orthodoxy and have learned from many Orthodox teachers.

I understand that the Judaism of the Tanach differs from the Judaism of the Mishnah or Talmud. Yes, animal sacrifice is radically different from prayer. However, I object to your broad pronouncements about ancient and “Rabbinic” Judaism; we really don’t know a whole lot about how it “really was.”

I understand “power” differently from you. I don’t believe it stems only from politics, and I believe that the rabbis often empowered Jews by helping them maintain their humanity and their sense of history.

I believe in a God who is “there” and who is “here.” And while I regret human failings as well as God’s seeming absence, I am unwilling to relocate God to the self, which really returns us to the original discussion about narcissism.

We disagree about whether the Torah and Jewish people need to be “renewed.” I’m still old-fashioned enough to want to affirm what some rabbis taught so many centuries ago: the learning of Torah is equal to all other mitzvot because it leads to all other mitzvot (Talmud Torah k’Neged Kulam; it still resonates far better in the original Hebrew).

The need for renewal suggests decrepitude, and while certain forms of Judaism and perhaps even segments of the Jewish people have become decrepit, Jews and Judaism have been in an ongoing state of renewal for many centuries. I don’t think that we are anywhere close to knowing all the answers, or even whether we have been asking the right questions.

You mention Rabbi Akiba. He was illiterate for most of his life until he humbled himself, attending school with children, ultimately becoming one of our greatest teachers. Even so, he placed his faith in a soldier, Bar Kokhba, proclaiming the latter as the Messiah who had arrived, in the midst of war and profound suffering, to redeem Israel. Even our greatest teachers can be wrong. As one of Akiba’s rabbinical colleagues explained “Akiba, grass will grow out of your cheeks and David’s son the Messiah will still not have come.”

Arthur, the grass will grow out of our cheeks before the arrival of the messianic age. It will take all of us, collectively as well as individually, in a partnership with God, whose spark resides within us but still transcends us, to bring about the world we yearn for.

Shalom,

Dan


more »

Day 2: Is Jewish Renewal the Next Step in Spirituality, or Boomer Narcissism?

Keep the Hootchy Cootchy out of my religion, please

From: Arthur Waskow
To: Daniel Bronstein
Subject: Speaking of false dichotomies…

Dear Daniel,

Since you’ve raised the danger of false dichotomies, let me point to an obvious one: mystical versus rational. Jewish Renewal sees the rational and mystical as intertwined. Reason cannot stand alone, but the world cannot stand without it.

Reason has brought us telephones and computers and equal rights for women. But the perversion of reasonThe Perversion of Reason: Nagasaki, 1945The Perversion of Reason: Nagasaki, 1945 has brought us H-bombs, the burning of the Amazon forest, and the shattering of local communities. Jewish Renewal embraces reason while rejecting the perversion that separates reason from spirit.

I respect many aspects of Reform Judaism. One of my heroes is Rabbi David Einhorn, a 19th-century Reform rabbi whose own congregation forced him to flee Baltimore because he called for the abolition of slavery. I am sad to say that many Reform rabbis have no idea who he was, and no interest in emulating his courage.

Reform Judaism knows it has shortcomings, but doesn’t know what they are. The most crucial one is that it never realized the need for a profoundly new paradigm of Judaism—as different from Rabbinic Judaism as Rabbinic Judaism was from Biblical Judaism.

Why am I pointing toward a new paradigm? Not because I celebrate whatever is new and reject whatever is old. If that were true, I would dump Judaism altogether.

Be Fruitful and Multiply: Urban SprawlBe Fruitful and Multiply: Urban SprawlRather, it is because I see a world in which the human race is transforming the biological web of life, changing the chemistry and climate of our planet, achieving the biblical vision of “be fruitful and multiply, fill up the earth and subdue it”—and shows no sign of stopping.

I see a world in which the Jewish people—absolutely without precedent in our history—possesses one of the world’s mightiest states and armies, and enjoys major political power within the world’s mightiest nation.

And I see a world in which Jewish women, who have for three millennia been debarred from shaping the future of Judaism, are now beginning to exercise that power.

But I see little effort outside the Renewal movement to take all this into account and shape a Judaism that works and matters. The Jewish people must reconfigure itself as a transgenerational “movement” committed to healing the planet.

To do this, we must retire the assumption of powerlessness that lies beneath all Rabbinic Judaism. It is because of this assumption that the Jewish people has evolved no code for the responsible and sacred use of power either in the US or Israel.

Only Jewish Renewal has attempted to end the dichotomy between “ceremony” and “social action” so that a seder may mean assembling 2,000 people in a public space to demand the end of Pharaoh, as we have done. And we intend to light Hanukkah candles at the headquarters of ExxonMobil to demand a policy through which the oil we now use in one day might last eight days. There are many more such examples.

Recognizing the destructive culture of overwork, JR utilizes the practice of meditation as a way to groundFighting the Culture of Overwork: Jewish Meditation at Elat ChayyimFighting the Culture of Overwork: Jewish Meditation at Elat Chayyim oneself and reconnect with God. Who else is doing this? And what other Jewish movement is nurturing organic gardens, or exploring permaculture?

Who else has proposed relinking bar/bat mitzvah to the sexual maturation that was originally at its root?

And—this is at the center of it all—who else is moving away from metaphors of God as “King” and “Lord” toward “Breathing-spirit of the universe” (ruakh ha’olam) and “Wellspring of Life” (eyin ha’chayim)?

It is hard but joyful work, swimming upstream against a Jewish and American culture that worships idols such as wealth and power. It is hardly “boomer narcissism.”

The boomers I know, and the surveys that look at them, show continued deep devotion to what we call tikkun olam. There aren’t as many sit-downs as there were 40 years ago, but there are lawyers doing Neighborhood Legal Services or challenging polluting corporations, doctors in Medecins sans Frontieres, and so on.

In fact, I wonder whether the whole notion of boomer narcissism was invented—not by you, Daniel—as a way of undermining the energy for social decency that still actuates most boomers.

Shalom!

Arthur

 

From: Daniel Bronstein
To: Arthur Waskow
Subject: Breath of Life? Or just Bad Breath?

Dear Arthur,

We’re talking past each other. We may be facing a true generation gap here.

I don’t think that anyone simply made up the idea of boomers being narcissistic. Their religious “journeys” often become one-way tickets to the mirror. Take a gander at the work of sociologists Robert Bellah or Robert Wuthnow, who have demonstrated this.

Regarding dichotomies, I’m reminded of the Three Stooges’ 1935 short film Restless Knights. FacedA Sucker for Simple Dichotomies: Jerome "Curly" HowardA Sucker for Simple Dichotomies: Jerome "Curly" Howard with the choice of having their heads cut off or being burnt at the stake, Jerome Horowitz, a.k.a. Curly Howard, decides that a “hot stake is better than a cold chop.”

Yes, the world is far more complex than strict mind versus body, mystical versus rational, or even male versus female. Judaism has always demanded a holistic life entailing attention to mind, body, and soul. And even those who history has portrayed as rationalist—the Vilna Gaon comes to mind—were also practitioners of mysticism.

I’m also no apologist for Reform Judaism, and I have no interest in a micturition contest about whose denomination, Renewal or Reform, is “better.” We all need to be open to self-criticism, but we have an obligation to critique one another as well.

Indeed, it has taken a long time for Reform Jews to become Reform rather than “reformed,” and Reform Judaism still runs the risk of becoming mired in all of the balderdash, flapdoodle, poppycock, tomfoolery, and malarkey of modernity. But neither should we be dragged backwards into pre-modernity, with all of its suffering, violence, imbecility, and general smelliness.

That is to say, I would no more study Torah strictly via the documentary hypothesis than I would try to ensure a good harvest by “hooking up” with the neighbors and doing the “hootchy cootchy” on a field. It took long enough to get away from childish, gendered definitions of divinity, and worship of the material. Why, for goodness sakes, would we want to be pulled back into this muck?

Toward the end of your 1996 book Godwrestling Round 2: Ancient Wisdom, Future Paths in the segment titled “One I” you write, “I stand inside God’s skull, behind the face; I look through God’s eyes, my face in Face, I see myself, ourself.” On the next page you write that in this experience lies “the dangers of inflating the ego and of annihilating it.”

I agree with you completely about the dangers of inflating the ego, and I find these reductionist formulas of God=world=me=us to be both obfuscating and disturbing. On the other hand, our world could use far more annihilation of ego.Nope. It's Not a Joke.: The Kabbalah energy drinkNope. It's Not a Joke.: The Kabbalah energy drink

I recently saw a sign advertising a “kabbalah” energy drink, a perfect example of what happens when we subvert serious disciplines into mass fads, cheapen the profound, and gratify our egos rather than morally and intellectually challenging ourselves. You’ve written that the “breath of all alive will bless Your Name because the breath of all alive, it is Your Name. The breath is in us and beyond us, intimate and transcendent.” Whether or not one chooses to define God as “the breath of life,” I remain concerned that this language empowers the egotistical and enables those who are unwilling to turn from the intimate to the transcendent. To equate the Name with the "I" or "Me" is bad breath.

Daniel


more »