Wed, Aug 20, 2008

User login

TAG:

Heeb

Clip of the Week: Night of the Living Jews

"Not just another Hasidic zombie movie"
 

As Passover approaches, let us take a moment to remember those Jews we’ve lost—you know, the ones who consumed “matzoh with a dark history” and were transformed into the living dead only to be hunted down by the goyim they preyed upon. Wait. What?

Add Hasidic Jews to any situation and it instantly becomes funnier—that’s the theory behind Sam Falconi and Oliver Noble’s Night of the Living Jews, a Heeb Magazine–produced film about Jewish zombies who use their lethal peyos to attack gentiles. The film premiered in October, though if you happen to live in Australia or Canada you can catch it this spring. It features Melissa Leo, Homicide vet and star of the Sundance darling Frozen River, as Jewish Mother Zombie. (It could have been worse—she could have been cast as Bagel Zombie.)

Will the zombies be taken down by the power of a bacon double cheeseburger? You’re going to have to watch to find out.


 

We Read Jewish Magazines So You Don’t Have To

 

Don't be fooled by his innocuous nickname: SchwarztieDon't be fooled by his innocuous nickname: Schwarztie This week in J-media:

  • Did you know that the gays cause earthquakes? The ultra-Orthodox Israeli political party Shas just suggested that instead of reinforcing buildings, the government should spend more money discouraging homosexuality. Insert obligatory San Francisco joke here, and then bang your head against the wall while wondering how you’ve managed to get stuck in the same religio-ethic group as these people. [Jewschool via Haaretz and the Jerusalem Post.]
  • At JSpot, Hannah Farber asks the world’s rabbis to please stop insisting that she (and every other Jewish professional woman) pop out some babies right this very minute. Jewschool responds. [JSpot, Jewschool]
  • This writer is really, really angry at Jerry Seinfeld, and not because of Bee Movie. [San Diego Jewish Journal]
  • From the department of How Not to Grow the Jewish People: Rabbi Shlomo Schwartz, who runs the Chai Center in California, just can’t stop sending angry text-message-speak e-mails to women who appeal to him for Jewish knowledge. A steller example: “Shame on U 4 yr disgusting unpaid whoring ways 2 try & take Jewish men away from Jewish women. Hitler murdered Jews & U R also trying 2 exterminate Jews." [LA Jewish Journal]
  • An Orange County task force says antisemitism is so rampant at UC Irvine that Jewish students should stay away. [JTA]
  • Heeb gets at the biggest issue facing young Jews today: Beefy men playing strip dreidel. [Heeb Magazine]

 
DAILY SHVITZ
Are Young Jewish Women an Advertiser's Dream?

With the release of the first issue of Jewish Living magazine came a phone call to me from a reporter at the Palm Beach Post. Jewish Living is a new Martha-esque lifestyle ‘zine for the Jewish homemaker, and the reporter thought that as editor of the website Modern Jewish Mom I could give him the dish on this new "trend" of marketing to hip, Jewish moms.

I told him it's not so new, the idea of making it hip to be Jewish. From Heeb and Jewcy to Rabbis Daughters and ChosenCouture, (I even threw some credit to Madonna and Demi), hip and Jewish is here to stay. As the young women who onceThe Lifecycle of Hip: From Challah Back t-shirts to Jewish Living magazineThe Lifecycle of Hip: From Challah Back t-shirts to Jewish Living magazine wore "Challah Back" boy beaters now become mothers, websites and magazines will follow.

But that wasn't what he wanted to hear.

"Wouldn't it be smart for Bloomingdale's to advertise in JewishLiving? After all, aren't Jewish women their primary customers?"

"Non-Jewish women shop at Bloomingdales, too. And Bloomie's and their ilk can reach a Jewish AND non-Jewish audience by advertising in mainstream magazines. JewishLiving readers probably won't be interested in ads for Maneschewitz, though."

He kept pushing. I knew what he wanted. For me to say we're a bunch of materialistic JAPs who love nothing more than to shop. That we're more likely to be found in Saks than in shul. That reaching a niche market of wealthy, young Jewish women is an advertisers dream. So why would advertisers need to bother with shiksas when they have JewishLiving?

The more he pushed for me to tell him the differences between Jewish and non-Jewish women, the more I realized how slight those differences are. Today, being Jewish is part of our identity, but not our entire identity. We want tradition to be relevant and valuable while fitting with our modern lifestyles. Gone are the days when we will stay home all Friday to make Shabbes.

Are we highly educated? Yes. More so than our mothers, but only because of the sacrifices our mothers made so we could go to college and grad school. Are we wealthy? Yes, Jewish households in America are wealthier on average than non-Jewish households, but overall there's a heck of a lot more disposable income and college degrees among non-Jewish women than Jewish ones. Do we look different? Not so much, anymore. Do we dress differently? I almost started talking about the whole "goyishka" way of dressing when I remembered some Lily Pulitzer pieces in my closet!

For magazines like Jewish Living, and websites like mine, talking to modern Jewish moms means taking into account who we are as a generation. We're more jaded than our mothers. We don't kowtow to the rabbi simply because he is the rabbi. We juggle insane schedules, and tradition better damn well make sense if we're going to give it our time. So speak to us intelligently and thoughtfully and don't patronize us.

So, would mainstream advertisers be smart to advertise in JewishLiving? Absolutely. Because it would show support for the Jewish community. Because it would prove that they understand that when Rachael Ray tells her audience that her Christmas buffet casserole made of leftover ham, turkey, cheese and creamed corn would work just as beautifully for Hanukkah, it's offensive. Because last year's December issue of Family Circle didn't even mention that there were other holidays besides Christmas being prepared for in homes. Because mainstream lifestyle resources are not adequately addressing the needs of the Jewish family and so we've stepped in and met the need ourselves.

But not because you think we're a generation of JAPs who can't stay out of Bloomingdales.


DAILY SHVITZ
Jews Still "Acting Black" in 2007: From White Negro to Jewish Hipster

The death of Pulitzer Prize-winning author Norman Mailer has cast attention back on some of his early essays, including “The White Negro,” an influential piece that first appeared in Dissent magazine in 1957. Written during a period he described as "the years of conformity and depression," Mailer's essay focused on the hipster—"the urban adventurer. . .who drifted out at night looking for action with a black man's code to fit their facts"—as a hero capable of providing the antidote to America's stultifying postwar culture.

"The White Negro," and the hipster lifestyle it details, remind us that white Americans have looked to blacks not only as a group upon which they could project the negative aspects of their society, but also as an object of longing: Whites fantasize that the African American embodies the expressiveness and sensuality with which they as whites have lost touch in their self-styled "march toward progress." Bristling under the confines of postwar culture, Mailer admired the hipster as white man who, like his imagined black counterpart, could free himself from "the sophisticated inhibitions of civilization," divorce himself from society, and relinquish "the pleasures of the mind for...the pleasures of the body."

Although Mailer did not explicitly mention his Jewish background in "The White Negro," the essay was undoubtedly shaped by the symbolic importance African Americans and their culture have long held for American Jews. Mailer himself was a product of the urban streets where Jewish youth of the 1920s, 1930s, and 1940s often listened to "race records," formed their own jazz bands, and occasionally made evening excursions to Harlem and other African American neighborhoods. Not only were many of the leading white interpreters of African American music during the interwar period Jewish, but so was the original hipster, Mezz Mezzrow (né Milton Mesirow), a clarinetist who declared himself a "voluntary Negro" and devoted himself—in his own words—to "hipping the world about the blues the way only Negroes can."


Continue reading...

DAILY SHVITZ
Gay Tweens Need Dolls

As a young girl, I had over twenty Barbie dolls, which I once arranged in their Dream House in a brothel scene, with one Ken sodomizing the other over the Utility Kitchen. My mother's reply: "You're too old for Barbies."

Toy marketing execs say that, in the 1960s, girls we would now call "'tweens" or even actual teenagers played with Barbies. In the '80s, my friends and I would've been mortified had anyone known we still played with Barbies after the age of eight or nine, even if we secretly still liked them. Now, the target market for Barbies is ages 3-5. The dolls have largely, of course, been supplanted by Bratz (you may have seen ads for the upcoming feature film).


Continue reading...

FEATURE
Six Months of Smut
Jewcy's archive of sex and porn coverage
Now that The New Republic’s Britt Peterson has come out as a highbrow porn star (well, extra), we thought we’d get in on the cerebral smut racket by offering the following compendium of recycled Jewcy articles all about the oldest profession in San Fernando Valley. We took some heat back in the day for doing what all Jewish magazines must do when they come alive and try to titillate the reader with uncensored displays of chosen carnality. A few dames in cyberville even claimed that the Jewcy was going to be just another playground for the undersexed nebbish pumping up web traffic with his one free hand. We’d like to think we’ve matured and evolved since then —or, at any rate, cured our acne. And as you’ll find, plowing past our famed Joanna Angel-plus-mom interview, our respect for the skin trade has taken on ...
DAILY SHVITZ
I Heart Heeb

Jewcy was recently asked to sponsor a night of avant-garde Jazz interpretations of traditional Jewish music—the kind of ingenious, rooted-in-the-past-but-not-limited-by-it cultural event that we’d love to get involved with. The catch: Heeb was also sponsoring the event. Would we be willing to co-sponsor an event with Heeb? I mean, don’t we want to distinguish ourselves from that awful epitome of vacant New JewYou're so """edgy""": Quick! Sneer at the hipster!You're so """edgy""": Quick! Sneer at the hipster! posturing?

God, am I sick, sick, sick of this anti-hipster backlash, if I see the word edgy in scare quotes one more time I'm going to hurl. Heeb is constantly being pissed on as the mother of the Jewish hipster Frankstein, and I can’t count the times people have challenged us to show we're not tawdry and worthless like they are. Well bullshit, Heeb was good and important, limited though it was/is. No one else did what they did, when they started doing it, no one else showed that Jewish media could grab you by the balls and squeeze, instead of serving you the warm milk with piss of stultifying, blandly self-celebratory Jewish media.

Yes, we’re bringing more substance to the table, we think that iconoclasm and irreverence is most potent when wielded in the pursuit of substance, as well as thrills. But if, in their zeal, anti-hipster militants fail to note the distinctions and group us together with Heeb, I can’t for the life of me see why we should care. It doesn’t matter how many searching articles we run on atheism, Zionism, whatever: Some people will still shout out our names during their "hipsterism is sooo lame" jerk-off parties. And what does it matter?

Heeb
made a huge contribution to Jewish media, it’d be great to collaborate with them. And that jazz night sounds awesome. Let’s do it.


Day 2 (Shneer): Is Zionism Still Relevant to the American Jew?

Zionism is 100 years-old and aging fast.

From: David Shneer
To: Stefan Kanfer
Subject: 100 Years-Old and Aging Fast…

Dear Stefan:Jewcy: Only punning and clever?Jewcy: Only punning and clever?

I had trouble with your letter to me, but I suppose that's the point of this dialogue. Let’s start with your opening, which has nothing to do with the topic we’ve been asked to discuss: Zionism. Your disdain for American Jewish youth culture shows a tremendous lack of understanding of what really motivates the people who manage these “hip” youth-inspired Jewish initiatives—the same generation of people who will be running Jewish institutions in the not too distant future. (Oh wait, I run a Jewish institution, and the editors of this website do, too, so I guess that time is now.)

First, I should remind you that Heeb comes out of your land of refuge from all things too Jewishly glib, New York, not San Francisco. Your choice to flee to New York doesn't insulate you from the ironic, too-hip tendencies of some aspects of Jewish youth culture. I think the point of Heeb—and perhaps Jewcy, too—is to put your teeth on edge. But I'll concede that I have issues with Heeb; not because it is punning and clever, but because it is only punning and clever.

As for New York, in which you have yet to find a Jew who is indifferent to Israel, I’d say, I should hope they wouldn’t be, not with Israel in the news everyday. But that isn’t the same thing as saying that Zionism is relevant to their lives.

But to the heart of your letter. Your statements about the rise in antisemitic violence in Europe sound very much like the speeches that Herzl and his buddies made in 1897 at the first World Zionist Organization meeting. Just like them, you say the world isn’t a safe place for Jews, as long as Jews are not running their own affairs, so get us out of Europe. One hundred years later, and 60 years after the founding of Israel (which was supposed to be the solution), we still hear the same old things. But if antisemitism is as perennial as you suggest, then why would Israel prevent antisemitism? It might give Jews guns (or “Yids” to use the word you wrote, mimicking the very language of your youthful nemeses), but it clearly hasn’t made Jews less hated, at least in your bleak, dark vision of the world.

You demonstrate Zionism's irrelevance by discussing your Jewish friends from France, all of whom are “lining up to get out.” To where, Stefan? Herzl would have told them that there’s only one place they would feel safe: Israel. Right?

Then why are they thinking about going to Canada and the United States? I presume you think that those two countries will soon be conquered by antisemitic Muslims running amok (they’ve already managed to manipulate Congressional representatives from Michigan, or so you suggest), and then your French friends will have to leave for Israel anyway, no?

The actions of French Jews, many of whom feel more embattled now than they have in many years, show that, as I said in my opening letter, Israel is one part of a complicated Jewish map. It is a unique place with a unique culture that makes some Jews feel at home and drives other Jews up a wall. Some French Jews choose Israel, while others choose New York, Montreal, or other places. You would presumably tell those who don't choose Israel that they should “wake up” (as you told me, again sounding like a turn-of-the-century Jewish ideologue).

I choose not to judge people’s decisions about where to call home. I choose to describe, rather than prescribe, and your French Jewish friends show that the world is much more complicated than you, or your hundred-year-old Zionism, would have it.

A quick story to close. I was having dinner with two Masorti rabbis two nights ago here in Jerusalem. At one point both of their cell phones rang, they looked at the number, “David, it’s the States. I have to take the call.” The same thing happened several times through dinner. When the U.S. called, these two rabbis jumped.

I'm not judging the power dynamics between American Jewry and Israel. I simply point out that these two Israeli rabbis dropped dinner to respond to New York, because that's where their Jewish world is centered.

David

Next E-mail: The world is at war, the enemy is close


more »

Day 1 (Stefan Kanfer): Is Zionism Still Relevant to the American Jew?

Sleepwalking in a minefield

From: Stefan Kanfer
To: David Shneer
Subject: Sleepwalking in a minefield

Dear David,

Years ago I was visiting a friend in San Francisco. I passed a temple bullHeeb: Retro, damaging, and achingly arch?Heeb: Retro, damaging, and achingly arch?etin board with the sign, “The Joy of Jewishing.” This is why I live in New York. Trendy neologisms like “Jewishly” are among my least favorite. And titles like Heeb are not only achingly arch, they are also ancient in impulse—though I doubt that this is known to the people who think it’s hip. To tell you the truth, the title of this punning website puts my teeth on edge.

In his book Jewish Wit, the Freudian psychiatrist Theodore Reik wrote that at his or her most desperate “the Jew sharpens, so to speak, the dagger which he takes out of his enemy’s hand, stabs himself, then returns it gallantly to the antisemite with the silent reproach, ‘Now see if you can do half as well.’” To me all such wordplay is strictly retro and very damaging. I have yet to see a magazine called “Nigger,” “Spick,” or “Wop,” and words like “negritude” belong to the 1950s. Woody Allen has had a lot of fun with such labels.

Back to the subject at hand. Is Zionism still relevant to American Jews? I disagree with your answer that most American Jews "would likely say 'no' if asked 'Is Zionism relevant to you?'"

Of course only a closely analyzed poll would settle this, but I have yet to meet a Jew in the New York area—which as you point out contains the largest number of Jews in the world—who regards Israel with indifference.

In part this has to do with the way the Jewish situation has been playing out in Europe. France, for example, used to pride itself on its history of post-revolutionary tolerance. Napoleon even insisted on a Sanhedrin for the Jews of his nation. Yes, in time there was the Dreyfus case, but that scandal was supplied with a happy ending; the gentile novelist Emile Zola raised hell, and justice prevailed.

There was even a Jewish prime minister, Léon Blum, before World War II, and one after it, Pierre Mendes-France.

French publicists failed to mention the enthusiastic cooperation of the Vichy government in handing over les Juifs to the Nazis. But it must be said that there was, in the wake of V-E Day, a national malaise, a discomfort with the way the local fascists had acted, and, for a while, all was well with French Jewry.

That is not so today. My Jewish friends in France are lining up to get out, to go to Canada, the U.S., and Israel. Several have told me that they don’t expect major trouble in their lifetimes, but that they cannot allow their children to grow up in the dangerously deteriorating nation.

The reason:

You know it as well as I. It is called Islam. Only a short while ago a Jewish youth was killed by Muslims in a banlieu outside Paris. The principal criminal was caught, but the fact is that scores of other Muslims in the building (and perhaps throughout the slum) knew that the young Jew was being held and tortured in a manner too inhuman to be described.

Another French Jew was murdered by a Muslim who then told friends, “I have killed my Jew, I will go to heaven.”

Well, you might say, that’s France, where there are at least five million legal and illegal Islamic immigrants who have not been absorbed into society—hence the riots of last spring.

Alas, the situation in the rest of Europe is not very different. I will not weigh down this initial letter with a laundry list of crimes against Jews in Sweden, Norway, or Italy—although Oriana Fallaci’s reportage on the last country is particularly valuable. You can read her in The Force of Reason.

Now, granted, Europe is not the United States. Here we have a great tradition of acceptance, dating from George Washington’s speech to the Turo congregation, guaranteeing freedom of worship and safety for all who would behave in the manner of good citizens.

Nevertheless, today a certain malaise can be detected by anyone with one eye open. Congressman John Dingell of Michigan refused to denounce Hezbollah, the organization responsible not only for the recent devastation in Israel, but also for the murder of American soldiers overseas. Could his refusal have occurred because he represents a portion of Michigan, the state with the largest number of Muslims in the U.S.?

And he is not alone. Seven congressmen (and one congresswoman) refused to vote for a resolution supporting Israel. They were joined by two senators, Robert Byrd and Ernest Hollings, both from the South. Why did they take this stance? You can bet one of the bedrock reasons was the sight of a strong Jewish nation in the Middle East. If you come from certain areas, the idea of Yids with guns makes you uncomfortable, especially if you’re being funded with Arab money.

All this is known to American Jews, many of whom prefer to keep their heads in the sand, especially if the sand is in East Hampton or Malibu Beach. Others know better. They know that Zionism signifies more than the three assumptions you quote. These are overstatements made by the straw men of the right:

“American Jews do not live at home. Rather they live in exile.” American Jews don’t believe this or they would be making aliyah.

“Israel will save Judaism from its perpetual demise.” Neurotic Zionists do believe this, assuming that intermarriage and inanition will eventually cause the disappearance of Judaism. Wiser observers can see a reawakening of the Jewish spirit, a resurgence of Yiddish, a new interest in Jewish history. But this in part is triggered by the very existence of Israel, the birthplace of Judaism.

“Israel is the center of the Jewish map.” This one is absolutely true! Here I wholly disagree with you. It is the center of the Jewish map. Where else would you locate the center? Copenhagen? Brooklyn? Warsaw? Moreover, Jews the world over know in their bones the truth of Eric Hoffer’s aperçu: “Lose Israel, and you lose the world.” (He was a goy, by the way.)

My grandfather—much engaged with the Yiddish theater and with the Jewish National Fund, and instrumental in backing Israel in the early days—used to say that when you awaken someone, you have stolen something from him.

So I’d hate to end with this observation. Those American Jews who find Israel irrelevant are sleepwalking in a minefield. What happens in Israel today will happen to the world soon enough, if that world does not stir itself. It’s all very well to celebrate the “diversity of Israel,” but right now Israelis are attempting to annihilate the enemies who want to drive them into the sea, a euphemism for a new Holocaust.

The alarm clock is ringing in Haifa, New York, Chicago, et. al. Wake up.

Warmest regards,

Stefan

Next E-Mail: Zionism is 100 years-old, and aging fast


more »