Palin Around with Tina Fey |
|
| Soap Box: What God Can Do for You Now | |
by Rabbi Robert Levine, October 20, 2008 |
|
Rabbi Robert Levine, author of What God Can Do for You Now, will be blogging all week as one of Jewcy's Soap Box bloggers. A rabbi on New York's Upper West Side, Levine presents a new outlook on God and spirituality that seeks to appeal to nonbelievers.
Governor Palin did a pretty good Tina Fey impersonation on Saturday Night Live this week. Additionally, she also proved that Alaskan female governors definitely have rhythm!
But, when she replaced Tina at the podium and swiftly announced that she was not going to answer anybody's questions, she reinforced a painful societal message that women have been trying to overcome for centuries: look good but keep your mouth shut. The New York Times front page article featuring "Dudes for Sarah" makes the same point pretty strongly.
In contrast, one of the most important and enduring results of Senator Hillary Clinton's presidential bid was that she got a lot of people who were never predisposed to seeing women in positions of such authority and leadership - lots of Joe the Plumbers - to take another look and often to fervently support her candidacy. Both men and women were given the opportunity to reassess their culturally reinforced prejudices. Girls could dream differently and, just maybe, boys would be less reticent to stomp on them.
I would like to think that any woman candidate would provide this inspiration, but I have my doubts, partly because of some of the governor's untenable stances. Responsible politicians can take what is dubbed a "pro-life" position on abortion, but believing that if a woman is the victim of rape or incest, with all the shock and shame that accompanies such a tragic crime, she must bear that child, shows no respect for the life of the mother - hardly pro-life.
Honestly, I can't believe Governor Palin would force her own child to carry such a baby to term if, God forbid, she were the victim. But wanting to deny women who are too poor the same access to abortion as connected, financially able people, frankly, is immoral.
In the Torah, God commands us to choose life. A true pro-life position does not destroy the life and psychological health of a mother in order to birth an unwanted child. A true pro-life position doesn't slash the budget on all programs that would give that unwanted child a chance in life.
Such retro views would be a major setback for women everywhere. So, can we go back to having Tina Fey in that role? Saturday Night Live proves that the sequel can be a whole lot better than the original!
About the author:
Rabbi Robert Levine, a leading American clergyman and Chairman of the Catholic-Jewish Dialogue of the Archdiocese of New York, provides down-to-earth, common sense reasons for how faith and prayer can profoundly change the quality of our lives. What God Can Do For You Now confronts the new atheism of Christopher Hitchens and Richard Dawkins and provides a spiritual answer to finding God in the world.
Rabbi Robert Levine, author of What God Can Do for You Now, is guest-blogging on Jewcy, and he'll be here all week. Stay tuned.
How Pure Are Purity Balls? |
|
by Tamar Fox, May 22, 2008 |
|
Say 'Virgin!': Creepy, right?Is it just me, or are purity balls really creepy? The New York Times has a crazy story this week about a big purity ball in Colorado Springs at which more than 60 girls and their fathers dressed up and danced late into the night to celebrate their purity. The girls do a dance (in tutus with a huge wooden cross), the fathers stand up and recite a covenant, and then two men walk up to the cross and hold swords in an arch over their heads.
Each father and his daughter walked under the arch and knelt before the cross. Synthesized hymns played. The fathers sometimes held their daughters and whispered a short prayer, and then the girls each placed a white rose, representing purity, at the foot of the cross.
I’m all for fathers spending quality time with their daughters and being a good influence on their kids, but something about this seems a tad overzealous and inappropriate. For one thing, what about the sons? Every time I turn around I see a newspaper or magazine article about how boys these days are doomed. But I’ve never heard of any mother-son galas, and while these fathers all pledge to guard their daughters’ purity none of them seem to acknowledge that if their girls are at risk for surrendering their purity it probably has something to do with how boys are being raised as well.
And it bothers me that men are the ones entrusted with these girls’ purity. Shouldn’t some of this be coming from the girls’ mothers? Aren’t they better suited to warn the girls against the perils of the ‘hook-up culture’? Why aren’t the girls being empowered to make their own good decisions about sex and purity, rather than allowing that authority to be taken over by their dads?
I’ve never been crazy about the Orthodox community’s stance on relationships, but at the very least they have women talking to women, encouraging them to make good decisions, and helping them to see the values of modesty and dignity.
In contrast, purity balls seem to infantilize the girls and inflate their fathers with a false sense of authority. Because what we need more of now is girls who can’t grow up, and men with oversized egos.