More on The Great Shlep |
|
| Our own Million Jew March | |
by Simon Glickman, September 29, 2008 |
|
Thanks to some killer PR and the hard work of folks like Mik Moore at the Jewish Council for Education & Research, among many others, The Great Schlep goes down on Columbus Day weekend. It's a mass pilgrimage of young Jews to Florida and other swing states, where they will endeavor to convince their older, often "low-information" relatives to vote for Obama.
I attended a beautiful fundraiser for said initiative the other night.
It was held at the mansion-like home of some very generous
entertainment-industry peeps, and I met a couple of mega-hot Jewish
celebrities there who nearly made my knees buckle. The food, provided
by the reliably brilliant Provisions (aka very haute
Jew Lisa Feinstein and crew), was a gourmandish series of twists on
classic bubbie nosh: brisket on toast, borscht shots (with crème
fraîche and orange zest), mini-kugels, paté (chopped liver), succulent
smoked salmon. The wine flowed freely. Handsomely attired Hebrews
strolled the lush environs.
And yet, from the cocktail-hour chatter, you'd think we were all about to be herded onto trains to Dachau. Everyone was so worried. So terribly concerned.
Worried about racist voters. Concerned about easily misled voters.
Worried that Sarah Palin would become President in ten minutes and life
would turn into The Handmaid's Tale. Concerned about what
Bill Clinton said on TV. Worried about what their neighbors said in the
driveway. Anecdotal blips on the radar screen were described like
incoming ballistic missiles. For sheer doom-and-gloom certainty, I'd
put any random bunch of Jews, even a well-heeled, high-information batch of Hollywood activist types such as these, up against the most rabid evangelicals in full apocalypse mode.
Fortunately,
the presentation — by Mik and various other folks from JCER,
JewsVote.org and other cool outfits (including friend of this blog and
mightily pregnant genius Jill Soloway) soothed some of these fears by
describing the Schlep and making a charming appeal for support before
screening this inspired, typically raunchy promotional video by Sarah
Silverman.
Before I go on, I'd like to say a couple of quick things about this video. First: Our
Sarah will kick their Sarah's ass. Next: I don't wanna hear about how
you found this video offensive or untoward or how it made you
uncomfortable. It isn't for you. It's for the kids who are going to
journey to the heart of their grandparents' couches to close the deal
for Obama, and they fully get and love her spiel. So shut your homentaschen hole.
Now I'd like to speak to the kids.
We
often hear that children are the future, and ordinarily I don't agree.
I just don't see the proof. But in this case, yes, children —
specifically motivated and liberal teenage and twentysomething children
and grandchildren of poorly informed, slightly confused elderly voters
in swing states – emphatically are the future.
So you know your job, right, kinder?
It's up to you to convince Bubbie and Zayde (and great aunt Rivke and
cousin Manny and all their friends at the Senior Center) to cast their
vote for our guy. This may not be as simple as it sounds. All kinds of
ridiculous lies about Obama being a Muslim or not supporting Israel or
whatever have been circulating like swamp gas among Jewish retirees,
fueled by the Karl Rove innuendo factory. Then there's plain old
ingrained racism, about which we'd like to think Jews would be more
enlightened, but there you go. You will encounter resistance.
You must crush that resistance with everything you've got.
If
you think I mean "Ply nana with an extra pot of Russian tea and tell
her about Barack's thoughtful foreign-policy stances," you need to get
real. I'm talking about tough love. I'm talking about winning this thing. Like Sarah S. suggests, I'm talking about emotional blackmail.
Nana has to understand that if she doesn't vote for Obama she's endangering her relationship with you.
This
may seem harsh, but let's face it: If McCain wins this thing, we're
mega-fucked. So it's time to put all our chips on the table, including
our willingness to stay in touch with low-info relatives in swing
states.
Look, I just want to help. I don't have any relatives in
Boca, and my peeps are all voting for Obama anyway. But I thought I'd
just sketch out a couple of talking points for you.
Of course, you do want to blow away the nonsense: No, he's not a Muslim
, and a prominent Chicago rabbi wrote an editorial about how spreading this smear is lashon ha-ra. Barack's been endorsed by 900 rabbis. The Israelis like and respect him.
You'll also want to make it clear that McCain's campaign is full of
classic Jew-haters, and that Sarah Palin is a dangerous fanatic who
scares the crap out of Israel. She believes Jews must be converted, she
quoted racist Westbrook Pegler in her acceptance speech, and her church
hosted a witch-hunting wacko who made some classically anti-Semitic
inferences that can be found here. You might imply casually that she writes erotic fiction about the Third Reich under a nom de plume; can anyone prove she doesn't?
And
given the age of your audience, it wouldn't hurt to remind them that
McCain, not Obama, wants to bet their Social Security check on the same
stock market that just fell apart.
Still, we both know that
voting often comes down to abstract, emotional issues. For whatever
reason, many older Jews have inhaled enough miasmic right-wing spew to
feel an ingrained distrust of our candidate. That's where the tough
love comes in. So let me offer you a few constructive dramatizations.
"Nana,
you're going to vote for Obama. He's a wonderful candidate and the only
one who can save our country. A vote for him is a vote for my future.
So if you love me and want me to have a future, you will vote for him."
Let's say she looks down at the plate of kichel,
heaves a weary sigh and says, "I'm sorry; I just can't vote for him."
What are you gonna do, pack up your stuff and head for the bus station?
I think not. You're gonna double down.
"Bubbie, let's be clear: You will
vote for Obama. If you don't, you are dead to me. Because you will have
chosen your wretched fears over my fondest hopes and flushed my dreams
down the crapper because some idiot alteh cocker down the hall told you the shvartzeh
won't stand up for Israel. And I don't care if you call him by that
vile word as you pull the lever for him, even though every time you old
Jews say it the little children who died in the camps and are now in
heaven cry tears of blood that stain the fluffy clouds beneath their
angel feet. You will vote for Obama because you if you don't, I'm going
to come back here and we're going to get a knife from the kitchen and
you can stab me right in the heart, just as Abraham was prepared to do
with Isaac before the Lord stayed his hand. Is that what you want to
do?"
I'm thinking by this time she's going to start to come around.
Sure,
it's a risky gambit to fire these emotional cannons at our frail old
family members. But nothing ventured, nothing gained. Plus, when Obama
wins in November and you come back to show them a bunch of family
videos and have a nice picnic at the wrought-iron tables in the condo
courtyard, they'll be delighted beyond belief. And so will you.
If, like me, you can't personally go on the Great Schlep, why not make a contribution?
[Cross-posted from Simon's wonderful blog, Very Hot Jews]
Sarah Palin Endorses Hamas |
|
| It's madness to continue asserting Palin's suitability for high office. | |
by Jeffrey Goldberg, September 29, 2008 |
|
How can it be that some people still pretend that Sarah Palin is suited for high office? This country has never seen someone so comprehensively unprepared for the vice presidency; Dan Quayle was Metternich by comparison.
I've watched Sarah Palin's interview with Katie Couric
three times, and my astonishment does not diminish. Her nonsensical
answer about Russia has deservedly been highlighted, but let me focus
on another question, this one concerning the export of democracy.
Couric asked, "What happens if the goal of democracy doesn't produce
the desired outcome? In Gaza, the U.S. pushed hard for elections and
Hamas won."
Palin's
answer, in full, was this: "Yeah, well especially in that region,
though, we have to protect those who do seek democracy and support
those who seek protections for the people who live there. What we're
seeing in the last couple of days here in New York is a President of
Iran, Ahmadinejad, who would come on our soil and express such disdain
for one of our closest allies and friends, Israel ... and we're hearing
the evil that he speaks and if hearing him doesn't allow Americans to
commit more solidly to protecting the friends and allies that we need,
especially there in the Mideast, then nothing will."
The issue
here is not that Palin didn't know the answer. There are many possible
answers to this question, some of which are right and some of which are
wrong. The issue here is that she didn't know the question.
Because she was apparently ignorant of the subject, she endorsed Hamas'
victory, and, in essence, called for the U.S. to "protect" Islamists
who seek to use democratic elections to lever themselves into power.
And, of course, Ahmadinejad came to power in a more-or-less democratic
election. Palin's answer was truly remarkable. A person who could be
President of the United States has shown herself to be completely
ignorant of one of the most vexing and important foreign policy
questions of the day. Freshman congressmen know how to answer this
question. Here's one possible Republican response:
"Yes, Katie,
it's true that if you push for democracy, sometimes you get an outcome
that you don't want. This happened in Gaza with Hamas, and I think the
Bush Administration was as surprised as everyone else. So the lesson
here is that you have be careful when you try to export democracy. But
I still believe that, over the long-term, democracy is the best
antidote to terrorism that we have. What we have to do, though, is know
when to push, and know when not to push. And every day, we have to do
the hard work of advocating for press freedom, and the rule of law, and
for all those things that build a civil society."
See? Not that hard. Unless you don't:
a) Know what happened in Gaza;
b) Know where Gaza is;
c) Know who rules Gaza today;
d) Care.
I
want to wait and see Palin on Thursday night in her debate with Joe
Biden; perhaps her performance in the Couric interview was abnormally
bad. But I have a terrible feeling that John McCain has placed this
country - and, of lesser importance, his campaign - in an untenable
position.
[This is cross-posted from Jeffrey Goldberg's Atlantic blog, which we think is great, and you should visit often]
CBS Poll: Obama 49-McCain 40; Palin Tanking |
|
by Richard Silverstein, October 3, 2008 |
|
The N.Y. Times reports this nice bit of news, that Obama has opened up a sizable lead over McCain in the latest CBS poll. Obama’s favorables are up to the highest they’ve ever been, McCain’s are down to the lowest they’ve ever been.
John McCain: Reppin' on the mic
I’m not foolish enough to believe that this is the end of the campaign or even the beginning of the end. There is a long way to go till November 4th and five weeks is a lifetime in presidential politics. After all, the bailout fiasco which apparently did so much damage to McCain’s image, was a very unusual development. One doesn’t know how the fallout will play out from this. Does the bailout have “legs” as a political issue (as I suspect it does)? Or will it recede into the political woodwork as Katrina did for Bush, in a few days or weeks? As long as it continues to occupy the public’s attention, McCain remains wounded.
And this is not a helpless candidate by any means. He can still land serious blows on Obama and potentially derail his campaign in any number of ways.
Bush's favorability rating is down to 22%! The lowest since Harry Truman in the Korean War. Who'd a thunk it only five years ago when he rode high in the saddle into the Iraq War?
One of the most delicious pieces of news from this story concerns Sarah Palin’s receding prospects:
The Pew poll found that 51 percent of respondents said she was not qualified to be president, compared with 37 percent who said she was. That is a reversal from early last month, when 52 percent of respondents said Ms. Palin was qualified to be president.
She’s
lost 15 percentage points in less than a month. That’s a candidate in
free fall, perhaps without a parachute given her recent performance in
Katie Couric’s CBS interview. When I first started writing about her
after McCain chose her I wondered why the American public wasn’t seeing
what I was seeing. My hope and conviction was that this would be a
process that wouldn’t happen instantaneously. But that a campaign of a
thousand paper cuts, perhaps inflicted by liberal bloggers and her own
hubris, would eventually bring her to her knees, which is more or less
what has happened. Now, let’s see if this impression is reinforced in
tomorrow’s V.P. debate.
Newsflash: The Coming Election Isn't Necessarily that Important |
|
by Christopher Fettweis, September 24, 2008 |
|
Election 2000: Important enough for a movie?If there is one thing that unites all media coverage of
the current campaign, as well most of our breathless analysis and
punditry, it is this: The 2008 election is the most important in a generation, perhaps in history.
Every election I can remember has been the most important in my lifetime. Either presidential selections are getting more and more important with the passage of time, or a great many of us tend to lose perspective every four years.
All presidential elections are important, of course, and this one is no different. The next occupant of the White House will determine the direction of our foreign and domestic policy...but they all do that. He will choose one or two new Supreme Court justices. But they all do that, too.
Establishing the unique, crucial importance of this election seems particularly important to the McCain campaign message. Elect Obama, we are told, and catastrophe will befall the United States. Al Qaeda will go on a rampage. Putin and Iran will be unstoppable. Your children will be in grave danger (if you love them, you'll vote McCain!).
McCain appears to think that his only route to victory is making people believe that the fate of the earth lies in the balance. A skeptic might suggest that scaring the bejeebus out of everyone is hardly presidential...but nobody really likes skeptics anyway.
There is good reason to believe that this election might not be as decisive as our candidates and hyperbolic media would have us believe. First of all, from the looks of things, the next president is in real danger of being a one-termer. Rarely do voters look kindly upon presidents who preside over tough economic times (FDR is the lone exception), and all indications are that the next few years will be somewhat grim. The next president is also going to be handed a few very difficult dilemmas by his incompetent predecessor. The violence has gone into remission in Iraq, but the patient is hardly cured; Afghanistan and Pakistan teeter on the edge of chaos; Dancing with the Stars is one of our most popular TV shows. Why anyone would want to be president right now, I have no idea.
And second, the threats facing the United States in 2008 are hardly more dangerous than those from years past. Sure, al Qaeda still exists, and remains a problem. But through good investigative work and international information sharing, our intelligence services have gained the upper hand in our struggle with Osama and the boys. Terrorists will always be able to kill people, but they cannot change our society. Only we can do that.
Both campaigns seem ignorant of one of the most important facts about current world politics: War seems to be disappearing from the planet. As a number of political scientists have been proclaiming for years, the incidence and intensity of all kinds of wars - interstate, civil, ethnic conflicts, etc. - are at historically low levels, and still declining. Entire continents are experiencing their greatest stretch of peaceful relations. Europe, South America, North America, Australia, and most of Asia are virtually war-free. Even in Africa conflict levels are lower than at any time in history. I go into more detail about this in the book.
In such a climate, countries are safe. The strongest is the safest.
So I am not convinced this election is actually that important. The truth is that we don't know how important any election is until the administration is over. As it turns out, those who told us that Bush vs. Gore was the most important election of our lifetimes were probably right. At the time, though, who knew?
Christopher Fettweis, author of Losing Hurts Twice As Bad, is guest blogging on Jewcy, and he'll be here all week. Stay tuned.
![]() |
The Only Rapping Jewish Faith Healer in the Presidential Race |
|
| Te'DeVan "Rocketman" Kurzweil tells us how he's going to change American politics through eBay. | ||
by Marty Beckerman, February 12, 2008 |
||
Te’DeVan “Rocketman” Kurzweil is the quintessential Jewish
New Yorker bohemian weirdo. A six-foot-seven-inch faith healer, freestyle
rapper and former nude comedian, Te’DeVan is a local legend who makes his
living in tips from those whom he cures and entertains. (I first interviewed
him for New York
Press in 2002 when he tried to convince
everyone in Times Square that terrorists were operating a Queens grocery
store.)
Now he is taking his message to the national stage through a bizarre presidential campaign. He has garnered supporters at numerous music festivals and university campuses—from California to Tennessee to Washington, D.C.—and on the Internet at his personal blog.
Six feet seven inches of presidential candidate: RocketmanAre Americans ready for a six-foot-four Jewish faith healer as their leader? Can you "heal" this nation with your supernatural abilities?
Actually it is six-foot-seven-inch Jew. See how the media is already lying trying to diminish my physical size? Because everyone knows that height matters in political campaigns.
I would not consider my healing to be mine, but rather God's healing. With enough willpower, clarity of mind, and compassion we can all heal this country.
Are you running an actual campaign or is this a work of performance art?
I am not honestly sure if the two differ these days.
When you don't have a lot of money or the high brand name visibility, you have to incorporate a high level of entertainment to get everyone's attention.
Are you registered as a candidate in any state? Can people actually vote for you?
Our team of lawyers is attempting to get me registered as a candidate, but the combination of ageism and anti-Semitism might make this a serious challenge. Since we live in a democracy, of course people can vote for me and my wing-mate Smiley along with our ever-expanding Infinite Cabinet. People are voting for me as a write-in candidate while other people are merely voting for me in their hearts and minds.
Anti-Semitism is keeping you off the ballot? What?
Ageism, not anti-Semitism. The Constitution supposedly says you have to be 35 years old, but the government doesn't really follow the Constitution anymore on most matters. To follow it because I am not of legal age seems absurd to myself and the Infinite Cabinet.
He's no Lieberman: Te’DeVan's running mate
Who the fuck is "Smiley"?
He is a lifeguard, Ferris wheel operator, bouncer and philosopher, currently residing in New Jersey until we get the biodiesel buses ready to roll. His first words to me on top of a beach pier across from a police station were: "Hey, you want to start a revolution?"
My response was "Hell to the yeah." A great friendship was forged.
What is your platform?
1) Stop killing people we don't know. Start helping people we do know right at home who are struggling with healthcare, the economy and the price of education.
2) Fess up to global warming and take serious initiatives to clean up the planet. We need clean air, water, and organic apple pie.
3) End the war on drugs. If we can't keep drugs out of prisons, why are we spending billions to keep them out of the country? Decriminalize pot. We have too many people going to jail for this -- it's flooded the courts and it's a waste of taxpayers' money. In many cases, prescription pills are more dangerous gateway drugs.
4) It's insane how many people we have in prison. We went from a prison population of 300,000 in 1981 to 2.1 million in 2004. At that rate, by 2027 we'll have 14.7 million people in prison. That is absurd.
5) Lower the voting age to 12. We will settle for 16. If we're going to turn these kids into pill poppers, we might as well make them lever-pullers, especially if we're going to try them as adults for murder.
6) Bring sexy back to the White House. Justin Timberlake was onto something. All these other politicians don't know how to act.
7) Give out three million college scholarships. Being educated and being in debt should not go hand in hand.
Eyes like Isaiah and a beard like Moses: Te’DeVan the prophetWhat inspired the campaign?
Once the primaries are over, it's business as usual for the major candidates. Issues become forgotten. Voters focus on the next pop star instead. Who can blame them? We have unlimited choices of shampoos and conditioners but only two choices for our world leader.
How are you using the Internet to campaign?
We are using MySpace, Facebook, Tribe, and YouTube, and we're selling the campaign on eBay. Smiley said that if big tobacco and the oil companies can buy a campaign, why not the American taxpayer? So eBay just might save the American democracy.
What do you mean, you're "selling the campaign"?
Politicians are bought and sold all the time. Campaigns are commodities. They spend over $300,000,000 to get a job that pays about $400,000. Obviously something is skewed here. I don't know of any servant position-public or private-that pays less then .013 of what it costs to obtain it. That is total insanity.
We are offering a service to bring back democracy in America. We will spend the money on biodiesel buses, food, and video equipment to document our great adventure.
What is your most memorable campaign experience so far?
I would say the overwhelming response we received at Bonnaroo (a music festival in Tennessee) where the other candidates dared not tread. We got some coverage from Current Television and Country Music Television. A lot of hands were shaken and pictures were taken. A lot of support was pledged.
Are people volunteering to help your campaign? Do you have any kind of staff?
We have staff working around the clock. We can't even keep up with all the different efforts. The staff is affectionately known as the "Infinite Cabinet" and is always expanding.
I think it's gonna be a long long time: On the campaign trail How many states have you campaigned in? How many do you plan to campaign in?
We have Infinite Cabinet members in all the states, including overseas, spreading the word about our campaign and the Infinite Cabinet. I am pushing to focus mainly in Hawaii knowing full well that surfers love us and that victory will be assured. Of course, the Infinite Cabinet in their infinite wisdom have a different plan of action.
How have colleges responded to you showing up and spreading the gospel to students?
We have rocked the college campuses hard, but until last month we were understaffed. We move more rapidly than plates of cocaine through the White House. And sometimes we garner too much attention. We're the bad boys of American politics. Just like the Pistons back in the days of Isaiah.
You have told me that you consult with psychic advisors. What do they say about your political quest?
According to our spiritual consultants, we are certain to be a factor in the outcome amongst the spirits polled in the Gallup poll. There is a margin of error of about three to five percent. We are certainly one of the most unique and all-encompassing campaigns, and we are going the long haul to the finish line.
What do you want to accomplish with this campaign?
We want to galvanize the apathetic, disenchanted, disenfranchised masses. We want to make the election prospects better for politicians who actually want to enact changes. We want to say, "Your vote may not always count but your voice certainly does, so speak up."
DEVELOPING: Gore and Edwards To Endorse Obama |
|
| Whispers from the corridors of Jewish power | |
by Tahl Raz, February 4, 2008 |
|
According to a high ranking official in Obama's campaign, JEWCY was informed this weekend that plans have been discussed for a joint Gore/Edwards endorsement of Barack Obama.
Why hasn't it already happened?
According to the official, the endorsement's value for Super Tuesday would be relatively minor given that it would only have 24 hours to circulate.
It would seem that the Obama campaign has determined that a Gore/Edwards endorsement would be more effective coming after what most expect to be a narrow Clinton win on Tuesday, helping the presidential hopeful rebound and regain some momentum going into the weekend's carousel of political talk shows.
| The Horse Race: Race-Baiting Dems Vs. Nutty Repubs | |
| A weekly look at whose campaign isn't going down in flames | |
|
by Marty Beckerman, January 15, 2008
|
|
Barack Obama: He has 99 problems, bitch ain't one.On the Left: Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama have called a ceasefire over the race issue. Hillary had previously said that Martin Luther King, Jr. wouldn't have accomplished his goals without President Lyndon Johnson, who was (get this!) white. Hillary's staffers accused Obama's campaign of distorting her remarks. Former President Bill Clinton described Obama's supposed superior judgment on Iraq as a "fairy tale," and many African-Americans felt that Clinton was referring to the notion of a black president -- which isn't crazy considering that a Clinton aide described Obama as voters' "imaginary hip black friend." Meanwhile, Obama entered a rally accompanied by the lyrics: "I got 99 problems but a bitch ain't one." The political guru Dick Morris, occasional toe-suckler (seriously, how the fuck does this guy have a career?), argues that John Edwards should end his candidacy like Bill Richardson, so that he might boost Obama's chances of winning the nomination. Another hopeless candidate, Dennis Kucinich, won his lawsuit to appear in tonight's debate. (Kucinich is fun, but he can't rock a mic like Mike Gravel.)
This week's winner: Clinton -- but she's playing dirty.
On the Right: Rudy Giuliani is in T-R-O-U-B-L-E. The former New York mayor is unable to stay ahead of John McCain in the polls and can't afford to pay his own staffers. Ron Paul is dead. Mitt Romney, who has money to spare (you sure save a lot of cash when you never purchase booze or pornography), is investing heavily in TV advertisements to regain his status as front runner. (A Mormon president? Isn't that kind of a fairy tale?) Mike Huckabee pandered to pro-lifers in South Carolina by visiting a "pregnancy counseling center." He also proclaimed that wives should "submit" to their husbands, and wouldn't answer whether he believes that only Christians go to heaven. But he has God's digits, so he should know.
This week's winner: McCain -- but his comeback is very fragile, and he looks awful.