The Beijing Olympics Are Like Berlin in 1936 All Over Again |
|
by Thomas C Laird, April 9, 2008 |
|
Protesters in London: express their feelings for the Party
As the Chinese Communist Party attempts to shove its Olympic Flame down the world’s throat, it is encountering something it finds shocking: Resistance it cannot shoot. Protesters against the Party’s recent massacres in Tibet have hindered the Olympic Flame in London and Paris. Today the “Grab the Torch” game moves to San Francisco. Party hacks are responding to protesters with outrage and hubris. They have branded those who freely express their opinions through protest as “vile.”
“No force can stop the torch relay of the Olympic Games,” Sun Weide, spokesman for the Beijing organizing committee, said in Beijing on April 9. Oh, really? No force? Rather confident, are we? No surprise here: The Party does not respect the power of democracy; it does not recognize its legitimacy, thus it does not exist.
In fact, citizens of France and England did stop the torch relay in their countries through massive public protests. These protests are expressions of a growing tide of outrage that the Chinese Communist Party was invited to host the 2008 Olympics in the first place. There is a growing sense that if the Beijing Olympics must go forward at all, they should be used to expose the nature of the dictators in Beijing. The major issue for anyone who believes in democracy is simple: This is not about the games, it’s about democracy; the protests are not against the great nation of China, they are against the Chinese Communist Party. Now, in light of recent and continuing massacres in Tibet, the goals and methods of the Party have been exposed yet again.
But If You Go Carrying Pictures of Chairman Mao: you ain't gonna make it with anyone anyhow. Why are citizens of democracies allowing the largest mass murderer in human history to wrap itself in the Olympic Flag? You cannot blame the Party. The Party is simply doing what it has always done. It is currently mounting its largest propaganda effort ever. In the past, the Party mounted such campaigns only in China: Let a Hundred Flowers Bloom, The Great Leap Forward, and so on. For those of us outside of China, there are two essential aspects to these campaigns:
So, what's the Party’s Olympic propaganda campaign all about? The Party wants to convince its own people that it is the legitimate ruler of China. It wants them to forget Tiananmen. It wants to make them ignore what the Party is doing now (and has done for 50 years) in Tibet. It is using propaganda in China to convince Chinese that Tibetan thugs were murdering poor Chinese in Lhasa, and the party had to crack down on them. The Party wants Chinese—and supporters of democracy around the world—to recognize that it is the legitimate ruler of China, even though it has acquired its power by mass murder, and has never been freely supported by those whom it rules.
The Party's Answer to Student Protest: tiananmen square, 1989
Modern nations—a status to which China aspires—recognize that legitimacy cannot be conferred by force of arms. The founding principle of modern democracy is that a government acquires legitimacy from the will of the people, as expressed through free elections. There is no substitute for a popular mandate. It is the only currency of political legitimacy. Any régime that acquires and maintains political power through the barrel of a gun—as Chairman Mao so famously expressed it—is ipso facto illegitimate.
The sad fact that all athletes preparing to compete in Beijing must recognize is this: When you hold up your medal, you are pinning it onto the chest of the Chinese Communist Party. You are helping the Party convince its own people that it's rule has legitimacy. You are helping the Party hide the facts of history from its own people, and the people of the world.
The facts of history are plain to see. The Party executed up to 3 million small landlords in 1953. The rational was simple: You cannot make an omelet without cracking a few eggs. They could not establish communism in China, and they could not create economic equality amongst all classes, until the petty bourgeois were murdered. That was just one of many such propaganda campaigns, which went on for decades. At least 30 million (and perhaps as many as 70 million) people died to establish the ideals of communism in China. How has that worked out? Well, today the Communist Party has dropped Communism as a realistic ideal. State-managed capitalism and crony capitalism are now the driving engine of China’s march to super-power status. The Party serves as the slave master for foreign corporations: Our shoes are cheap in America because the Party forces Chinese to work without free unions.
Hitler at the Olympics: Berlin, 1936
Hosting the Olympics is the Chinese Communist Party’s conscious attempt to confer legitimacy to its rule, methods, and goals. It seeks legitimacy in China and around the world. Sound familiar? The Nazi Party tried this in 1936. Western athletes who claim we must not taint the Olympics with politics are speaking from ignorance or self-interest. Is that what they would have said to homosexuals and Gypsies who were already being rounded up by the Nazis, even as the world gathered to celebrate the 1936 Olympics in Berlin? Is that what they would have said to German Jews, in 1936, who though not yet being arrested, were already forbidden to enter stores or restaurants?
Just what part of “Never Again” do those in Europe and America, who accept the Party’s Olympic propaganda campaign, not understand? Samantha Power has quoted author David Rieff's suggestion that, "'Never again' might best be defined as 'Never again will Germans kill Jews in Europe in the 1940's.'” I suggest that “never again” means we cannot allow the Party—already guilty of mass murder in Tibet and China—to host the Olympics even as it supports genocide in Sudan and Burma.
That’s the Party that is just dying to meet you in Beijing: A Party that is even now massacring Tibetans, once again, while our governments do nothing. The Party is doing the same thing it has been doing for the last 50 years, and with the Olympics on the horizon, the situation bears an increasingly eerie resemblance to Berlin in 1936.
Time to stand up and be counted.
What You Can Do
Start A Conversation: When you buy a pair of shoes, explain to the clerk that you need them to help you find a pair that were not made in China. They will ask why, and you can explain that the Chinese shoes are cheap because the Chinese Communist Party:
If You Had to Walk a Mile in Tibetan Shoes: you'd definitely boycott the Party
This education process can work in any store. Educate yourself about why Chinese goods are so cheap. When you go to Whole Foods, and cannot find frozen edamame except from China, ask to see the Manager. Explain to them why you will not buy the edamame from China, and ask why Whole Foods is not supporting American farmers.
Whenever you have time, every purchase, in every store, can be a moment to spread the facts about the Party. The real strength of a democracy is educated citizens.
Protest: If you're in San Francisco, you can protest against the Olympic Torch.
Get involved with Students for a Free Tibet and join in some of their actions.
The Story of Tibet: the first-ever history of Tibet written with a Dalai Lama Educate Yourself: Thomas Laird worked with the Dalai Lama over the past ten years to write a popular history of Tibet. The Story of Tibet: Conversations with The Dalai Lama is the first-ever history of Tibet written with a Dalai Lama. This is required reading if you want to know what’s happening in Tibet and China during this Olympic year. You can read reviews of the book and a sample chapter here.
Laird contributed interviews to this interesting Australian radio piece on Chinese and Tibetan History.
You can also hear him n the Paula Gordon show, and on WHYY, Philly.
Watch this chilling, detailed, covertly-made documentary about what the Party is doing in Tibet.
One of the most amazing video reports about the recent protests in Tibet is here.
China Tibet War on Youtube:
See The Party version of history and recent events here.
Watch a rebuttal here.
Keep abreast of Tibetan news here.
Here is a story to start with: The Party thugs who are providing security to the running of the Olympic Flame through the streets of San Francisco were selected from a special unit of the People’s Liberation Army. This same unit is used to suppress Tibetans in Tibet. Imagine that Nazi Party Brown Shirts were running an Olympic Flame through a US City in 1936. That’s what’s happening as we sit and watch. See the facts, here.
Ask yourself: Who made the decision that it was okay for these thugs be on the ground in a US city? Find out, and protest directly to them. What message does that send to the Party? That their actions in Tibet are legitimate?
Links to Follow:
Tibet Justice Center
Students for a Free Tibet
International Campaign for Tibet
International Tibet Support Network
Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy
Human Rights in China
Spielberg, What Took You So Long? |
|
by Helen Jupiter, February 14, 2008 |
|
ET Gives Spielberg: a talking toIt was so disappointing when, back in April 2006, Steven Spielberg joined the art advisory team for the 2008 Beijing Olympics. I remember being struck by the double standards inherent in his action: A man whose films include Schindler's List and Munich, and who had created the Shoah Foundation, was willingly entering the employ of an authoritarian regime known for its oppression of religious and spiritual groups, political activists, and
of course, Tibetans. Religious rights and freedom of expression are
just two issues on the long list of Chinese human rights abuses. And then there's China's involvement in Darfur.
We live in a world that still grapples with the Holocaust; indeed—a world in which Holocaust survivors remain (albeit in dwindling numbers) to share their testimonies. We have seen the kind of suffering that victims of the Holocaust endured repeated again and again in the sixty years since—in Cambodia, East Timor, Guatemala, Rwanda, and Sudan. You'd think we would have learned a long time ago from the global mistake of the Armenian Genocide, which kicked off the bloody 20th Century and set the world stage for what was to come. Spielberg's choice to creatively support the Olympic games in China seemed to imply that he'd learned only to value money over humanity.
His decision, finally, to protest Beijing's support for Sudan by resigning from the Olympics team is late, but heartening.
Related: Jewcy's Darfur Coverage
| Mideast News Roundup | |
|
by Avi Kramer, July 25, 2007
|
|
Egyptian and Jordanian foreign ministers arrived in Jerusalem representing the only two Arab governments that have signed peace deals with Israel. They spoke today about the peace initiative and specifically avoided referencing the Arab League, which has never recognized Israel. Yet, without mentioning the League, the two foreign ministers are pushing the Arab League’s peace plan for the region which stipulates three main conditions for normal relations with Israel: 1. full withdrawal from land occupied in the 1967 war, including Jerusalem, 2. the creation of a Palestinian state, and 3. a just solution to the Palestinian refugee problem. [Debka] [The Washington Times]
Beijing’s Xinhua news service reported today that Taliban rebels have demanded that eight Taliban prisoners be released in exchange for eight South Korean hostages. The hostages are primarily female members of a Christian group who were abducted last Thursday in Ghazni, southwest of Kabul. [Xinhua]
The deadline for releasing the Taliban prisoners was set for Tuesday evening and then extended indefinitely. Debka reported this afternoon that the Taliban has killed one of the hostages. [Debka]
Shvitz editor Michael Weiss, posted yesterday on Libya’s release of six medical workers—five Bulgarian nurses and one Palestinian doctor—who were held for eight years under the dubious and unsubstantiated charge of deliberately infecting children with the virus that causes AIDS. [Jewcy]
Susannah Sirkin, deputy director of Physicians for Human Rights, said, “The charges were fabricated; the nurses were tortured into confessing; there was no due process.” [The New York Times]
In the aftermath of the prisoners’ release, the EU has no problem normalizing relations with Libya’s leaders: French President Nicolas Sarkozy will travel to Tripoli to boost the EU-Libya ties. [BBC]
President Bush’s lynchpin: personal diplomacy via frequent video conferences with Prime Minister Nuri Kamal al-Maliki of Iraq. They chat on troops and leadership and God, which is all well and good, but where are the results? [The New York Times]
David Remnick writes the Letter from Jerusalem in this week’s New Yorker profiling Avraham Burg, a former Speaker of the Knesset, and a “Zionist politician who has lost his faith in the future” (of Israel).
“People are not willing to admit it,” Burg said, “but Israel has reached the wall […] We are already dead. We haven’t received the news yet, but we are dead. It doesn’t work anymore. It doesn’t work. . . . There is no one to talk to here. The religious community of which I was a part—I feel no sense of belonging to it. The secular community—I am not part of it, either. I have no one to talk to. I am sitting with you and you don’t understand me, either.”
“After some fifteen, twenty years in political life I had a feeling all of a sudden that, to use the Biblical term, Israel was the kingdom without prophesy. I realized that the three founding narratives of the national idea of Israeliness were over: the mass immigration to the land, aliyah; the security of the land; and the settling of the land. All three had served their purpose and were no longer the core of the nation’s narratives.”
On the Holocaust as a reference point for Israeli statehood, Burg told Remnick,
"We confiscated, we monopolized, world suffering. We did not allow anybody else to call whatever suffering they have ‘holocaust’ or ‘genocide,’ be it Armenians, be it Kosovo, be it Darfur. In the last years, Israeliness has confined itself for itself only and lost interest almost for what happens in the world. For me, Israel is shrinking into its own shell rather than struggling for a better world."
Otniel Schneller, a Knesset member from Ehud Olmert’s centrist Kadima Party, has said that when Burg dies he should be denied burial in the special section of Mt. Herzl National Cemetery reserved for national leaders.
Today, more than 600 French Jews made aliyah. [JTA]
| The Week in Jews | |
|
by Avi Kramer, July 11, 2007
|
|
ON THE RUNWAY: PHILANTHROPY AND CONDOMS
THE NEWS:
Israeli fashion designers draw attention to the plight of women denied divorce by their husbands. [Jewish Telegraph Agency]
THE CHATTER:
They may be chic, but the ensemble isn’t complete: Israelis can’t get their fashion-conscious paws on Apple’s illustrious iPhones. [Israel Today]
In Far East fashion, Beijing designers show off condom-covered gowns to raise AIDS awareness. [Reuters]
ROLLING THROUGH THE HIMALAYAS
THE NEWS:
Israeli vacation enclave in the Indian Himalayas. [Times of India]
THE CHATTER:
But the plans for all-night raves below snowcapped peaks had to be put on the hold: Israeli authorities discovered their million-tablet Ecstasy shipment. [Jewish Telegraph Agency]
No need to travel abroad: it’s all reggae music and mind chemicals at the Jewish Woodstock. [Yahoo]
MATZAH: THE NEW FEED FOR CAGE-FREE CHICKENS
THE NEWS:
Eco-Kosher movement gains momentum. [The Washington Post]
THE CHATTER:
No shrimp in my mao pu tofu! China tours go kosher. [The Jerusalem Post]
Warning: if you want to live, don’t market bad seafood. China’s ex-food and drug guy gets whacked. [The New York Times]
IT WASN’T THE 15 SAUDS. IT WAS THE JEWS!!
THE NEWS:
Jews responsible for 9/11. [WingTV]
THE CHATTER:
What’s on your nightstand? I just can’t put down “The Synagogue of Satan.” A real page-turner! [WingTV]
Young “G.I. Jew” on the frontline in Iraq. [Jewish Telegraph Agency]
WHAT DO YOU CALL A JEWISH VIDEO? JEWTUBE!
THE NEWS:
Jewish entrepreneur launches JewTube. [Ceo Smack]
THE CHATTER:
They’re gonna have to do better than a montage of lady Mossad soldiers soundtracked to the Red Hot Chili Peppers. YouTube’s got dogs on skateboards! [JewTube]
The site’s founder, Jeremy Kosen, seeks “to create a community of filmmakers, musicians and artists who share Jewish themes.” [Haaretz]
Young Jewish innovators come together in Jerusalem. Makes our hearts flutter. [Jewish Telegraph Agency]
IF HAARUTZ HA-RISHON CAN’T SHOW NAKED BABES...
THE NEWS:
Haaretz reports today that Internet censorship in Israel could start within one year. [Haaretz]
THE CHATTER:
Politician Ammon Cohen of the ultra-orthodox Shas party proposed the bill in May. [Pulverblog]
A blogger argues that it’s more than a person’s right to see boobs. Liberty is at stake. [Hooqs]
Maybe Ammon Cohen should censor the Hebrew alphabet too since some letters look like Kama Sutra.
| Sexy Jew Fei Meet Sexy Beijing | |
|
by Beth Gottfried, February 6, 2007
|
|
Our Jewish expat, Su Fei, goes on a mission to uncover why sexy female Chinese film stars, of past and present, can't seem to catch a break in Hollywood and their native land. Su Fei digs deep into the life of former Hollywood screen siren Anna May Wong whose personal and professional life took a nosedive as a result of California's anti-miscegenation laws.
| Stick A Cucumber In My Mouth And Call Me Su Fei | |
|
by Beth Gottfried, January 9, 2007
|
|
Thought Charlotte's sticking a mirror next to her vagina in "Sex & The City" was ballsy? How about a nice Jewish girl who uses an alias that means a brand of "feminine hygiene napkin," speaks fluent Mandarin, and travels all the way to Beijing to search for love in back alleyways? Did I mention she has her own show?
Check out this week's episode entitled, Weddings Gone Wild. Hey, she dons a bikini which means some nudity is promised, at the very least.