Religion & Beliefs

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Like the Mohel

By Michael Bahler / January 6, 2010

I was never in the pro-circumcision camp yet when the ultrasound revealed that my wife, Jen, was carrying a baby boy, I found myself insisting that we get rid of his foreskin. I wasn’t a particularly observant Jew but the idea of having an uncircumcised kid was just too culturally unthinkable to me-on par with naming him Christopher or smearing the Ash Wednesday paste on his forehead. A lot of Jewish couples now have the circumcision done in the hospital followed by a unisex naming ceremony, but we decided to bite the bullet and go through with the traditional bris. However, I wasn’t going to trust just any bearded guy to cut my son.

The rabbi who married us recommended a local radiologist who was also an accredited mohel and we checked out his website. I understood that the circumcision itself was such a simple procedure that it was actually farmed out to medical students at most hospitals but I was still disturbed by the photos on Dr. Rubenstein’s website showing him hovering like a car mechanic over various newborns as the beaming parents and smiling guests watched. And when did mohels get websites?

We spoke to the mohel on the phone later that week.

"You’re a radiologist," I said to him, "not a people person. So why do you want to deal with crying babies and annoying parents?"

"It’s a common misperception that radiologists don’t like people," Dr. Rubenstein said.

"Not in my experience."  

"Michael!" Jen said, holding the other receiver.

He told us that carrying out halacha by performing the ritual of berit milah (circumcision) was his way of serving the Jewish community. He also bashed his competition.  "Halacha only requires that the top of the foreskin be removed," he explained in his slow sleepy tone, "and most mohels cut too little and the look of the penis is not very aesthetic, but I don’t cut too little."

"Have you ever cut too much?" I asked.

He laughed as if I were making a joke.  

"Have you ever had a mishap?" I asked.   

"How do you define mishap?"

"Why don’t you define it?"

"Well, I’ve been late to a house on occasion."

"Okay," Jen said to me, "enough."    

"How many have you done again?" I asked him.

"About 500."

"And no complaints?"  

Jen jumped in and asked him about his availability in late October and early November and whether two of our non-Jewish friends could be the godparents. Remembering that news story about the nutjob ultra-Orthodox mohel who’d given a kid herpes by sucking the blood from the circumcision wound, I asked Dr. Rubenstein if he’d ever sucked a circumcision.

"Michael!"

"I don’t want there to be any surprises."

"I know what you’re talking about," he said, "and no, I don’t do that. I think it’s disgusting."

"I’m sorry, Dr. Rubenstein," Jen said. I got Jen to ask around for a good mohel because I wasn’t sold on Dr. Rubenstein. She reported back that it basically came down to whether we wanted a medical doctor or someone with a more traditional background, and, as to the style of the circumcision, whether we preferred the mushroom cut or the pig in a blanket.  "Is this like the Dorothy Hamill?" I asked her.  

"Apparently, the mushroom is better because it’s less prone to infections."

"So which one do I have?" I asked.

"I don’t know."

I dropped my drawers.

"I still can’t tell," she said.

"I can’t tell, either," I said.

We eventually settled on Dr. Rubenstein, because the due date was around the corner and we still had to agree on a name.  On the night of the bris, Jen scolded me for being hostile to the lightly bearded and heavily bespectacled Dr. Rubenstein, as if I should have said nothing when he tried to get us to sign a sweeping waiver freeing him from liability for any infection or shaft injury that might befall our little Benjamin, and I should have been more genial as he undid Benjamin’s diaper and checked to see if we’d applied enough numbing lidocaine cream on his soon-to-be-mutilated foreskin and I should have ignored our forty or so guests and spent all my time trying to make him feel welcomed.   

"Stop staring at him like that," Jen said as we waited by my parents’ dining room table for the ceremony to begin.

"I don’t know what you’re talking about."

"We hired him," she whispered to me, "he’s not forcing this on us."

Dr. Rubenstein put a goofy yarmulke on Benjamin’s head and fed him a sip of Manischewitz, and it hit me that there were loads of movies about weddings being stopped at the last minute, featuring dramatic scenes at the altar, but nothing about a bris being called off. So spiriting my baby away now (coo coo ca choo, Dr. Rubenstein) would be unprecedented.

My friend Alex had flown in from California just for the day so he could attend the bris, and my college friends Ying and Amrish had rented a car and battled rush hour traffic so that they could make it. I’d thought that my non-Jewish friends would be so horrified by the bris that it might cause them to change their position on Israel, but instead they snapped pictures and seemed genuinely curious.

I gulped as Dr. Rubenstein assumed his car mechanic posture over my child. Benjamin was a whopping nine pounds and an ounce with a beautifully formed torso and a strong grip, but he was still a fragile thing with tiny fingers that seemed ready to snap off every time I tried to fit his wiggly body into an outfit. Dr. Rubenstein wanted me to cup my hand over his hand as he cut off my son’s foreskin, symbolic of Abraham circumcising his son Isaac in the bible, and I declined fearful I might unsteady his precision.

I placed my hand on his back.

Benjamin started crying, and I turned away.   

"It’s over," my father said to me, "you can look now."

I breathed easier.  My son’s penis was still there.

POST A COMMENT

  • Robert Samson
    By Robert4 5/4/10 at 10:18 a.m. UTC

    I am sorry, but that HIV excuse is not scientifically credible. For every study showing a reduction, there are studies showing the opposite–cherry-picking what you wish to believe does not make something valid.

    For a SCIENTIFIC analysis of this claim, go here:

    http://mysite.verizon.net/dortfay/science.html

    And I also do no accept one’s religious belief as a valid excuse to harm one’s child–leave the option for having damaged genitals up to the owner of those genitals!

    Especially when one does not follow ALL of the mandates of that religion–again cherry-picking is a  pathetic  excuse to harm infants

    Forcing harm on helpless infants or childrenis not a good reflection on Judism..the same as it is not for Muslims.

  • Sheldon P Ranz
    By goldmarx 1/9/10 at 9:58 p.m. UTC

       There are plenty of matters where parents do not consult with their underage children, so why should we make an exception for circumcision?  Familes are not supposed to be democracies but benevolent monarchies.

       For more than a decade, studies have shown that male circumcision has prevented numerous men from getting the HIV virus, especially in sub-Saharan Africa.  Why risk your son’s health by avoiding circumcision?

  • Oren Adelman
    By chaver 1/6/10 at 5:05 p.m. UTC

    Jim Rubenstein was the mohel at my son’s bris.  He conducted the ceremony with humor and meaning.  And my wife, son and I were happy with his handiwork.  Check him out…http://www.mohelmd.com 

  • Sara Ellyn Davies
    By The_Holy_Halfbreed 1/6/10 at 1:33 p.m. UTC

    At the time my sons were born, I was not actively Jewish. We considered circumcision, but the hospital said it would cost more, was not medically necessary, and that there were risks. My husband, who is not Jewish, wanted to go through with it, "in case they want to be Jewish some day." I was so squeamish about what might go wrong, and about hurting them, and above all, altering their natural bodies without their consent for what would then have been cosmetic reasons, that I said no. Circumcision didn’t have any spiritual or religious significance to me at that time.  When they were born they looked like cherubs in a Rennaissance painting. Cut penises don’t look like that. As it turned out, one of them remained completely healthy, and the other had a one-time problem with infection under the foreskin.

    Sometimes I regret the decision not to have them cut, because it sets them apart from other Jewish kids. They would have to choose to have it done as adults. Other times I am glad I didn’t do it, so they still have a choice about what to do with their own bodies. In the back of my mind, I am also thinking they can’t immediately be identified as Jews, if something crazy happens and there is mass persecution of Jewish people again, as during the Shoah. It is a complex and emotionally challenging decision to have to make.

    I read somewhere that circumcision is about "perfecting" the body, and I thought: what if we were supposed to elect to cut off our sons’ nipples or something? What if it was a little finger, or part of an ear? Is it right to mutilate the body of another human being? Many people go in for tattoos and scarification, but they do so as consenting adults. Some parents get their babies’ ears pierced, which I would not do. The issue of consent is important to me.

    How do people feel about the issue of consent? I am not saying parents are wrong to get their sons circumcized – if it has significance for you religiously and you know what the symbolism is and it is meaningful, then for you it is the right thing to do.

     

    As Rabbi Hillel said, what is hateful to you, do not do to others. That is the whole of Torah, the rest is commentary.

Wanna post your own comments?