Religion & Beliefs
EXODUS: sexist, racist, softcore porn
By Laurel Snyder / November 30, 2006
I thought I’d take a minute today to mention one of the worst things that ever happened to Judaism (and Israel)—the publication of the disgusting book EXODUS, by Leon Uris.
Despite being horrendously offensive on a million levels (including a pretty ugly depiction of diaspora Jews), it found most of us when we were young enough (and uneducated enough, and indoctrinated enough)… to slip under our radar as a sexist/racist tome. It caught me, and I even realized it was sexist and racist in high school, and I still liked it. Because I was all het up about Israel.
But guess what? It’s still in print, still selling like hotcakes, and when I asked a group of my Hillel students (at the University of Iowa) what their favorite Jewish book was, they all said, unanimously, EXODUS! Sweet smart girls, and they thought EXODUS was the best Jewish literature our tribe has produced. (sorry Roth, Bellow, Singer…)
So today, I thought I’d use this little soapbox to suggest you all go find the worn paperback on your shelf somewhere, or your mom’s shelf, (or even buy one at a used bookstore—though for God’s sake don’t order a new one!) and re-read it. But this time, as you read, substitute “Black” or “Mexican” or “Chinese” or “Jewish” each time you run across the word “Arab.” And see what you think. Revisit your old favorite and get brutal about what it really is.
What do I think? Nostalgia+racism=racism. Nationalistic pride+racism=racism. Bad writing+racism=racism. EXODUS is just racist propaganda, with a little sexist softcore porn thrown in for good measure. Made hugely dangerous by its ridiculous popularity. It's insane that a lot of us got our first Israeli history lesson from this book.
So go re-read the bad boy, and when you realize I’m right, that Uris is a fascist, BURN that fucking book. And remember that you should, each time you encounter anything (new or old), approach it with fresh eyes… as much as you possibly can.



POST A COMMENT
phybgftn http://bmhuovgj.com jywpjjiq hxnkqvst
esthesia rocker poppet
pund sulfanamide paravenous
orthopsychiatry abjure thyrite
Exodus versus the Whitey Tape
While many American Jews opposed discrimination against African Americans on ethical grounds, the majority either held racist attitudes toward blacks or backed equal civil rights out of political or social opportunism. (See Obama and the Freedom Riders.)
In Eastern Europe, ethnic Ashkenazim were at least as bigoted as everyone else, and the popularity among Jews of Uris' Zionist trilogy consisting of Exodus and the sequel volumes The Haj and Mitla Pass shows that Jews have no objection to racism per se because these books contain practically every Jewish Zionist negative anti-Arab and anti-Muslim stereotype as well as a lot of generically anti-Christian or specifically anti-Polish, anti-Ukrainian and anti-Russian prejudice.
Here are just a few of the multitude of anti-Palestinian, anti-Arab, and anti-Muslims passages that Uris included in his texts.
Because Uris is such a poor writer, I doubt that Obama ever read the trilogy, but if he really likes this stuff, a fondness for such racist material should be a much more critical issue than the possibility that Michelle Obama might have used the term whitey — except that the Jewish-dominated media and far too many Jewish journalists refuse to address or to criticize bigotries that characterize a large number of Jews.
Zionist Film: Exodus – Terrorism is Good
6 min 39 sec – Oct 10, 2007
goes through practically all the standard false claims to justify
Zionist Ashkenazi colonization and aggression against the native
population of Palestine. The movie leaves out the book's
characterizations of Arabs as smelly or dirty, but it does include the de rigueur association of Nazis with the anti-Zionist resistance. In
point of fact Labor Zionists themselves tried very hard to work with
Nazi Germany and did so fairly effectively until 1939 while al-Hussayni
was fairly quickly dispatched to Bosnia, where he did not speak the
language, when he finally tried to approach Germany for aid.
Both the director Otto Preminger and the author Leon Uris had many
revisionist associations. Therefore, it is not too surprising that Exodus contains a Jabotinskian or Revisionist justification of Zionist terrorism that
in 2002 underscores the hypocrisy of the Israeli and American Ashkenazi
reactions to legitimate terrorism against the State of Israel. Like
most Hollywood movies that contain the theme of nation creation, the
movie ends with a poignant sacrifice for the sake of the nation. Exodus is particularly creative in this regard because one of the martyrs on behalf of Zionism is a Zionist Arab. Exodus is exceptionally explicit in sending the message that the USA should get in bed with Israel.
[1]The following passage is excerpted from Reel Bad Arabs by Jack G. Shaheen.
In the 1950s, when Americans were largely apathetic about Israel, the
eminent public relations consultant Edward Gottlieb was called on "to
create a more sympathetic attitude" toward the newly established state.
And so, he sent Leon Uris to Israel to write a novel, which became the
bestseller Exodus. Art Stevens writes, "Uris' novel solidified
America's impressions of Israelis as heroes, of Arabs as villains; it
did more to popularize Israel with the American public than any other
single presentation through the media."
Exodus introduced
filmgoers to the Arab-Israel conflict, and peopled it with heroic
Israelis and sleazy, brutal Arabs, some of whom link up with ex-Nazis.
The movie's only "good Arab" becomes a dead Arab.
Zionist organizations such as Irgun tried to end the British occupation
of Palestine through a campaign of attacks, for example, bombing the
King David Hotel. Under such pressure, Britain handed the problem off
to the UN, and the UN simply handed more than half of Arab-owned
Palestinian land for the Zionists to establish a Jewish state.
Throughout the film, Jewish nationalists are tagged "freedom
fighters"—though with the tables turned today, films follow the Israeli
and US governments in denying this label to Palestinian "terrorists"
trying similarly to end the Israeli occupation.
Likewise, the film's British, unlike the real British, seem more
concerned about Arab than Jewish violence. A British solider tells an
Israeli youth, "Don't wander into the Arab section. Run into one of the
[Jerusalem] Grand Mufti's gangsters [and] they'll kill you, son.
They'll slice your throat." A British General declares, "The Arabs
simply won't keep the peace… The Arabs are fanatic on the subject of
Jewish immigration."
At no time does a character reveal that Jewish troops are terrorizing
Palestinians, forcing them from their homes. Ari's father Barak (Cobb)
addresses Jews, saying, "[We] changed these mosquito-infested swamps
into such [fertile] fields. On a quiet night you can hear the corn
grow… The Grand Mufti of Jerusalem has asked you [Palestinians] to
either annihilate the Jewish population or abandon your homes, and your
land, and seek the weary path of exile. We [Jews] implore you, remain
in your homes and we shall work together as equals in the state of
Israel." Ari echoes his father's advice, telling the crowd: "Now, we'll
be equal citizens in the free state of Israel. Why should they [the
Palestinians] go anywhere. This is their home as well as ours. Don't
you see, we have to prove to the world that we can get along together?"
Never spoken in this movie are these words: "Palestinian," "Palestinian
Arab," "Palestinian village," "Palestinian state." Instead, Exodus Jews,
Arabs, and Westerners say: "Arab," "Arab village," and "independent
Arab state." On two occasions, the phrase "Palestinian Jews" is
mentioned.
In 1937, two-plus decades prior to Exodus, the Ray Film Company's, The Holy Oath, a Yiddish language film with English subtitles advanced a similar "good" Jews and "bad" Arabs theme. Screened in New York City, The Holy Oaths objective
was not so much to entertain audiences, rather to muster viewers'
support for a worldwide Jewish movement to gain and rebuild Palestine.
To engage viewers, The Holy Oath shows Arabs, not Jews, at Jerusalem's wailing wall. Throughout The Holy Oath, the
Jewish protagonist declares that God gave this land [Palestine],
flowing with milk and honey, to the people of Israel. To illustrate,
footage selectively displays Bedouins roaming the sterile cities of
Hebron and Jerusalem. Even Eleanor Roosevelt thought the Palestinians
were all nomads, so she believed there would be no problems evicting
Palestinians from their homes.
dnmmjntp http://srefabwr.com rcowxkix nuvfljbz [URL=http://qrpqmssj.com]uwxhvcop[/URL] cpmcpokz
I don't own Exodus but I do have Trinity, Uris's big fat novelized history of the years leading up to Irish independence. Uris is obviously a serious Hibernophile, a disposition for which I have a great and natural sympathy, but unfortunately he also has its most undesirable side effect: a smug and uncomplicated bigotry toward Protestants.
So basically it's like what you describe with Exodus, but with Anglicans and Presbyterians standing in for Arabs. Who needs it.
??? ?? ???,
Joey
As someone who is studying to be a Jew and have reams of books to catch up on when it comes to the cultural aspect of the (widly diverse) Jewish people, I have yet to read this book. I can't wait!! As far as the motherfucking book "Gone with the Wind"; I'd rather eat my left foot before I read that (racist) trash again…or the watch the movie.
You got me! I loooooove Gone With the Wind. See, now I have to go re-read that and thinka bout this!
And yeah, maybe book burning is evil, but I don't think I'd encourage the reading of Exodus EVER! And I would like to see it out of print. I really do think it's done a lot of harm. I think there are a lot of uneducated AIPAC college students throwing fits on campus and using pretty nasty language… basing their concept of "The Arab World" on Uris. Maybe it's time for a new version of the book, an annotated Exodus. I don't know. Hmmmmm. Do you think it does GOOD?
I'll Netflix the movie… just in time for Chanukah, and get back to you on that.
Have you seen the movie? It gets around the anti-Arab problem by simply refusing to acknowledge that there was an Arab population in Israel in 1948…at all. According to the film, everyone in Israel during the independence years was either a Jewish good guy or a British bad guy. Or, at the most complex, a conflicted Jewish Brit. It's ridiculous.
Paul Newman, however, is totally dreamy.
Also, I'd like to let it be known that I don't advocate book burning. I don't even advocate not reading Exodus, since it's pretty fun (kind of like that other racist epic that appeals to teenage girls, Gone With the Wind.) You just have to be aware while you're reading it that its view of the world is totally problematic and flawed.
Actually, this is a good topic for debate. Hey other commentors, would you tell your child/student/friend not to read Exodus? What about Gone With the Wind? What about watching the movies?
Wanna post your own comments? Gotta log in first!