Tue, May 13, 2008

User login

Words Or Turds: Hillary Clinton on Criminalizing Jesus

 

Forget the Farm Workers Endorsement: you want J-dog on your sideForget the Farm Workers Endorsement: you want J-dog on your sideIn describing her stance on immigration policy during Thursday's Democratic presidential debate, Senator Hillary Clinton dropped a subtly sly Jesus-bomb. Was the namedrop heartfelt and coincidental, or was it simply good planning? Half of those surveyed in a recent poll commissioned by the American Bible Society said they wouldn't vote for a candidate who doesn't believe in God, and a whopping 78% percent of those questioned said they like their candidates citing Scripture. So, you tell me: Is Clinton spouting words or turds?

When the House of Representatives passed the most mean-spirited provision that said, if you were to give any help whatsoever to someone here illegally, you would commit a crime, I stood up and said that would have criminalized the Good Samaritan and Jesus Christ himself.

I have been on record on this against this kind of demagoguery, this mean-spiritedness.

And, you know, it is something that I take very personally, because I have not only worked on behalf of immigrants; I have been working to make conditions better for many years.

 

Previously: Mike Huckabee on Gay Marriage, Fried Squirrels 



Helen Jupiter is a writer based in Los Angeles. She regularly contributes to Gridskipper,


More...
 

ChevyNazi


Just More BS from Hitlary

She'll do any thing to get elected.lol





ChevyNazi


I can't wait too when she

I can't wait too when she goes campaigning in the south and starts talking twangy.lol





Peace Love Unity


Politics

lol... she's definitely witty!

I say politicians will say almost anything to get to what they want.

But I would love to hear her talk twangy....hehehe 





mistah charley, ph.d.


senator clinton misremembers the parable and its message

the man whom the good samaritan helped had not committed any crime - he had, in fact, been the victim of a crime

those who passed him by without helping him - the priest and the levite - may have done so for "legalistic" reasons - e.g. they would have been ritually contaminated by contact with an apparently dead body - but this is not explicitly stated in the story

the good samaritan of the story extended much-needed help - and behaved in the way a good neighbor would behave despite his (the helper's) "outsider" status - but he did not do so in a way that violated any civil or religious laws

the story, word for word with an accompanying commentary, can be read at

http://www.carm.org/parables/parablesamaritan.htm

a detailed exegesis from a wesleyan-arminian (methodist) perspective - and i believe senator clinton has a methodist background - can be found at

http://wesley.nnu.edu/Biblical_Studies/parables/Lk10_25-37.htm

my conclusion - once again, senator clinton displays her contempt for the truth and for her listeners

 
[as for me, i received unitarian and methodist religious training as a child, and now regularly attend catholic services to accompany my wife]





Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <cite> <code> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.