![]() |
Eliot Spitzer's Hooker Scandal Has Biblical Echoes |
|
by Jessica Miller, March 14, 2008 |
||
With Eliot Spitzer out as New York's Governor and David Paterson now being portrayed as the sole righteous man in Sodom, America is busy getting to know a new character: Ashley Alexandra “Kristen” Dupre, the high-end call girl who Spitzer was caught employing. Seriously, if this press doesn’t boost her fledgling music career nothing will.
This week’s Spitzer news came as a pretty big shock. But over at Jspot, Rabbi Jill Jacobs is making an
interesting point: Haven’t we heard this story before?
Look Out, Fellas!: she's putting a spell on you
We’re not just talking boy meets girl, boy gets elected to public office, boy gets caught with a stripper narratives here. Rather, we’re talking about women getting to know men of status in the biblical sense, donning disguises and “playing the harlot” in order to make personal gains. Rabbi Jacobs puts it best: “A young woman, with no parents in the picture, conceals her identity and sleeps with a powerful man in the hopes of moving up in the world, or at least of saving herself from ruin. Must be almost Purim."
The more you think about it, the
more familiar and less modern the story becomes: Tamar, veiled and waiting for
Judah on the side of the road in order to produce offspring, Yael luring the
Canaanite general into her tent so that she could give him milk and stab him in
the brain, even Ruth, who got all dolled up and uncovered Boaz’s “feet” so that
she and her mom-in-law wouldn’t starve to death. A nice, girl next door type from New Jersey named Ashley
becoming the vixen temptress Kristen in order to make ends meet is not that far
off from these types of tales.
Jonathan Silverman
Do women need to play the harlot?
Check this out:
When we say, "A guy's gotta do what a guy's gotta do", it implies buckling down, sticking to his principles, doing the right thing....
When we say, "A girl's gotta do what a girl's gotta do", it implies the girl is whoring herself out.
Otherwise, exactly the same statements that mean opposite things.
What do you think JessM?
Post new comment