Posts

Qatar’s Righteous Gentile

Judeo-Arabic American Joseph Braude sends us his fourth dispatch from the Middle East. Doha, Qatar — If blame for domestic violence rests in part with neighbors who sit idly by, then the slaughter of 400,000-and-counting Darfuri African Muslims in Sudan … Read More

By / April 12, 2007
Jewcy loves trees! Please don't print!

Judeo-Arabic American Joseph Braude sends us his fourth dispatch from the Middle East.

Doha, Qatar If blame for domestic violence rests in part with neighbors who sit idly by, then the slaughter of 400,000-and-counting Darfuri African Muslims in Sudan is a pan-Arab disgrace. Governments throughout this region have turned a blind eye to atrocities perpetrated by Janjaweed Arab horseback raiders, Sudan’s Ku Klux Klan. Two Arab states in particular, Egypt and the Gulf emirate of Qatar, have done even worse: They have provided diplomatic cover for the genocidal junta in Khartoum that arms and equips the Janjaweed.

When, by contrast, a man stands up in either country and struggles against the deafening Arab silence on Darfur, he follows in the tradition of Gentiles who rescued Jews from the Holocaust—the “righteous among the nations.” He deserves to be recognized.

I meet Khartoum native Abu Bakr al-Qadi by chance in an air-conditioned office at Qatar’s Ministry of Justice in downtown Doha. He’s hard to miss: In sub-Saharan-spiced Arabic dialect and an operatic tenor voice reminiscent of Roy Orbison, he’s chewing out two Qatari officials at the top of his lungs.

“You’re hypocrites!” he cries. “The blood of Muslims isn’t cheaper because they happen to be African!”

One of the turbaned Qataris appears taken aback. An unwritten rule in this oil-rich sheikhdom calls for guest workers to show deference and decorum when addressing the native population. “Are you talking to me?” he asks.

“You and all the rest of you!” Qadi replies. “And why am I the only one? Why isn’t there a single Qatari raising his voice about Darfur in this whole country?”

The tension mounts as the two argue whether mass murder in Darfur is even taking place. The Qatari maintains that Western journalists are exaggerating or fabricating reports of carnage. It’s an “American-Zionist” propaganda tactic, he asserts, to destabilize Sudan and draw attention away from the real genocide in Palestine. “Just go downstairs to the street and anyone here will tell you where the true tragedy is,” he says. “Even the African on the street could tell you!”

Even the African,” Qadi seethes. The two men look as if they’re about ready to take their dispute outside.

“Forgive our Sudanese brother his passion,” the other Qatari cuts in. “He’s speaking from his gut.” A deep breath thaws the irate African’s icy stare, and he excuses himself.

As Qadi leaves the room, I tag along on the pretext of bumming a ride in his SUV. He turns on the ignition, and car speakers pipe in a vaguely familiar African choral chant, which stokes my curiosity. It’s a CD recording of listen-and-repeat religious hymns by a legendary Sudanese Muslim mystic, Mahmoud Muhammad Taha, who espoused the oneness of humankind and a radical reinterpretation of Islamic law before his execution in Khartoum in the mid-’80s. His egalitarian movement, the Republican Brothers, reportedly survives in Sudan—but only barely, and only in secret. Qadi, it turns out, was one of Taha’s disciples. And though Qadi has now spent eighteen years in Doha, where he works for a Western company, Taha’s philosophies still shape his worldview.

“Mahmoud Muhammad Taha had the answer to our problems in Sudan,” he tells me. “He foresaw this disease of ethnic cleansing, this lethal chauvinism; and his prescription was love, justice, and equality.”

Qadi moonlights as a weekly op-ed columnist for the liberal Qatari daily Al-Watan. Over t
he past months, he has used the column as a platform from which to raise alarm bells about the Darfur genocide. His writing takes Arab élites to task for tacitly endorsing what he calls a “violent campaign of Arabization” that targets Sudan’s non-Arab “marginalized peoples.” In one unpublished Arabic lecture, which he gives me to read, Qadi envisions a transnational “coalition of the marginalized,” including Africans, Kurds, and Jews in the Middle East. Coming from a Sudanese Arab living in the heart of the Gulf, these heretical ideas require off-the-charts chutzpah.

Over the next few days, I gradually learn that Qadi is no crank. To the contrary, his activism is sustained and fairly broad-based. Once a month, he holds a political salon in the living room of his house, where he brings together Sudanese intellectuals from the Arab north, the African south, and the beleaguered Darfur region in-between. I attend one, joining the local journalists and photographers who show up to write about the evening’s discussions. The two most popular Sudanese online discussion forums, including one that’s hosted in Khartoum, heatedly debate the published reports.

Qadi serves as a point of contact for Darfuri dissidents who pass through the Gulf, often in search of philanthropic capital and logistical help from well-heeled Sudanese exiles. These activities have earned him a personal warning to cease and desist from the Sudanese ambassador in Doha. It speaks well of the relatively permissive political environment here in Qatar that Qadi feels comfortable thumbing his nose at the ambassador.

All these efforts by a lone man in the Arabian Gulf may do little, in the grand scheme of things, to remedy the destruction and suffering in Darfur and beyond. But we celebrate the “righteous among the nations” precisely because their individual acts of courage are so rare. Here in Qatar, I pray that Qadi’s bravery and chutzpah inspires countless others to take action.

Tagged with:
  • Pingback: Eric Llanes

  • Anonymous

    Randall, I read one of the links and it quite frankly did not make any arguments about the death rates in the Congo.  It was rather a long harrangue against a businessman and how Jewish he is.  It struck me as pretty antisemitic.  If you could post something about how the Congolese goverment has a program for the extermination of people and the number currently being treated in displaced persons camps or how gunships are being used to burn villilages, or even above air shots of burned out villages you would be more persusasuive.   

     -Matt

  • Anonymous

    Randall thank you for the link to the Congo I do want to learn more about what is going on there.  However, I think need to look a bit further at the language you are using for accuracy.  All saracasm aside there is a legal/technical defintion of genocide and it is important (I have attached the dictionary defiintion below). 

    The Janjaweed have direct genocidal intent.  They regularly use rape and the targeted destruction of villages to achieve their stated goal of exterminating africans.  Neither Israel, nor the US have extermination as their goal in any of their current* conflicts/wars.  In fact a single days worth of bombings (or less) would be enough for either country to exterminate their enemies and they have not done it. 

    The refusal by both the US and Israel to use genocide as a solution to their problems puts them exactly in a position to preach.  Depending on your definition of "the West" you might be right since Germany conducted one of the worst genocides ever.  However, I think they have learned a horrific lesson and are now present a great chance to "preach" about genocide (Rwanda is sadly also now in this position).   

    It might be fair to look at France and Belgium as complicit in genocide because of their connections to the Hutu power movement, but I don't think it would be fair to say their intent was genocidal, but in their cases that might be semantics.

     -Matt

    *It is clear that the US was genocidal in some of its wars with Indians.  I would not say that means we should never weigh in on genocide but rather take an added responsiblity to speak out when it occurs again.

    Main Entry:
    geno·cide Listen to the pronunciation of genocide
    Pronunciation:
    \?je-n?-?s?d\
    Function:
    noun
    Date:
    1944
    : the deliberate and systematic destruction of a racial, political, or cultural group
    geno·cid·al Listen to the pronunciation of genocidal \?je-n?-?s?-d?l\ adjective
  • RandallJones

    I am not making an argument of what is a genocide and what
    is not, I am simply stating that those of us living in the West are no position
    to preach to those living in the Muslim world because despite the fact that we
    live in democracies we have not been able to stop our governments from committing
    war crimes and unfairly exploiting the natural resources of other countries.

     

    Do you consider what is going in the Congo a genocide or since
    the United States, Israel, and Europe benefit from diamonds and other natural
    resources, slave labor and sale of weapons (to both sides of the conflict) then
    the lives of these Africans does not
    matter?

  • Barbara Reader

    For, through this and other posts, so successfully illustrating the point.  I love it that it's 'genocide' when the number of Muslims is growing, but the fight is with non-Muslims, but it's not genocide when whole populations are being wiped out but those doing it are Muslims.

    A wonderful, illustration of my point, and so expanded from that of the original article!  Thank you!!  

  • RandallJones

    Barbara Reader,

    Your righteous sarcasm rings hollow considering how while Western countries preach human rights and democracy, they engage in regime change and support brutal dictatots and kings who do their bidding.

    The Arabs and Muslims have failed to stop the genocides in Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, and Palestine so why do we expect them to suddenly become successful in stopping the violence in Darfur?

    Those of us living in the West have failed to stop the genocides our countries have committed and this is despite the fact that we live in democracies and we have a say in what our governments do.

  • Barbara Reader

    Even if it's a year old.

    It is not a surprise that this is happening.  But Abu Bakr al-Qadi misses the point his opponents are making.  Muslims are always justified when they kill somebody.  Nonmuslims are never justified.

  • RandallJones

    Joseph Braude,

    What have Americans and Israelis done to stop their governmnets' role in fueling the violence in Sudan? Learn more about this here http://www.blackagendareport.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=447&Itemid=1

    The country where the most killings and rapes occur is the Christian Congo. The mainstream media doesn't discuss this much because the United States, Israel, and Europe benefit from the diamonds and other natural resources, slave labor, and sale of weapons (to both sides of th conflict). Learn more about it here

    http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_keith_ha_080207_the_gertler_steinmet.htm

  • Anonymous

    I saw the Doha Debates where the Darfur debate was discussed.  A member of the sudaneese cabinet was there.  It was amazing how the cabinet minister deflected attention to the Iraq and Afghanistan war instead.  It appears we are blind to the suffering of anyone who does not reflect this political Agenda.  The Media and Arab Goverments have a vast amount of influence in shaping peoples opinions.