![]() |
Mixing Heresy and High Fashion, Levi Okunov Dresses Women Up as Torahs |
|
| What, you've never seen a Hasidic fashion designer reference Sabbetai Sevi before? | ||
by Jay Michaelson, March 31, 2008 |
||
Last
night's hottie-filled fashion show debuting Hasidic Levi Okunov's
spring collection was, despite the shvitzing of a hundred Heebs packed
into an auditorium, very cool. Kudos to Andy Ingall and the JuMu staff
for turning what is often a highly un-cool space into a place where it
seemed like something new and sexy was actually happening in real time.
Kudos to Melissa Shiff for trancing us out to digital mandalas made of
Hebrew letters and sacred objects. And kudos to whoever bought the free
vodka.
But mostly, kudos to Levi Okunov himself, interviewed elsewhere on this site, and ably profiled by Jennifer Bleyer on Nextbook, who fused his Hasidic background and his audo-didactic fashion sensibility to create work that could've been novelty, could've been irony, but actually was art. Would that the vanity projects of some absurdly-funded Jewish narcissists were as careful to avoid the easy temptations of kitsch. What's the difference? Whereas aint-it-cool cultural kitsch is just a snide in-joke, Levi Okunov is actually trying to say something, to make something new.
To back up a little -- the Sabbatean heresy, which lasted from about 1665 to around 1820 (though there are still hidden Sabbateans today, some of whom are on Facebook) -- was, in large part, a secret mystical movement which laid the groundwork for Hasidism and preserved the antinomian ecstasy of Jewish messianism for over a century and a half. As the name implies, their central object of devotion was Sabbetai Sevi, who in 1666 counted 1/3 of all European Jews as his followers -- but who lost most of them when he converted to Islam rather than die at the hands of the Turkish sultan.
But devotion to Sabbetai was not the only point of the movement,
especially after Sevi's death. Many Sabbateans believed that the
redemption had come, and our job was to experience it now, by
deliberately transgressing the laws of the old regime -- especially
regarding sex. One of their notorious rituals involved having a young
girl dress as the Torah, her breasts exposed, while (male) devotees
danced around her kissing her breasts. This was, in a sense, a
recorporealization. The Torah is itself a stand in for the Shechinah,
the feminine aspect of God (a/k/a the Goddess): She wears a beautiful
velour dress and a crown, and then at a special time, we take the dress
off, open her parchment legs, and with our phallic pointer open her to
reveal the secrets that lie between them.
Many of Okunov's designs are quite similar, placing the garments of the Torah upon a (half-undressed) beautiful woman. I know that Okunov isn't deliberately referencing the Sabbatean ritual (he told me so last night), but I'm struck by the similarity of inspiration. In a sense, both Okunov and the Sabbateans are simply responding to the feminine iconography of the Torah H/herself. But I think there is something more interesting going on in both cases, which is the re-universalizing of the particular, the transcription of the mythic into a realm that is deeper than myth and which underlies the Torah, the Sabbateans, contemporary fashion, and all the other iterations of eros which spiritual and aesthetic souls have devised.
Sabbateans, after all, are not just finding excuses to have sex; like
all heretics, they are believers. Like Okunov, they are moved by beauty
and eroticism, see them as gifts from God no less holy than the Torah
itself. Okunov's post-Hasidic theology finds God everywhere (he told me
that too), not just within the bounds of orthodoxy, and indeed, quite
often in exactly those places which traditional law is so afraid of. In
the hands of a lesser artist, dressing a woman up in the Torah's
clothes would be an act of puerile rebellion. Oh boy, what a thrill, a
woman in a Torah crown. But in the hands of a mystic, it is to take
seriously the power of sexuality that makes religion worth doing in the
first place -- and worth stealing back from the pious. (Not
coincidentally, Sabbateanism extended its defiance of gender roles well
beyond sexuality; women were in positions of leadership and power in
the movement, and were as learned as men, even in the 18th century.
Mysticism and liberation don't always go together, but here they did.)
In an essay called "Renewal is not Heresy," Rabbi Zalman Schachter-Shalomi, like Okunov a renegade ex-Chabadnik, tried to explain why his form of de-orthodoxed Hasidism was not Sabbateanism. To many of us, he never quite succeeded. Who knows, maybe a kind of neo-Sabbateanism -- here as a stand-in for celebrating the erotic, visceral essence of true religion outside the bounds of traditional law -- is the Jewish renewal that many of us have been looking for. If so, I hope Levi Okunov's designing the costumes. Or lack thereof.
![]() |
Jay Michaelson is a columnist for the Forward and visiting professor of law at Boston University Law School. More... |
stacey.
cool idea,
but these outfits kind of suck. and the blonde chick's makeup looks like she's supposed to be some kind of gothic fairy-princess.
Reb Yakov Leib ...
Jay Michaelson on Levi Okunov & Sabbatian Kabbalah
Jay,
Yasher koach on an absolutely brilliant piece. I am so very impressed by it. Thank you.
Zevi Go'el,
Yalhak (www.donmeh-west.com)
P.S. I actually read it on Seven Fat Cow, where it's been reposted at http://7fatcow.com/2008/04/01/jay-michaelason-on-the-theological-sabbatean-symbiotics-of-levi-okunov/#comment-24064
Andrew Ingall
heretical and hysterical
Thanks for the article, Jay. So glad you came to the show.
Like Shabbetai, Okunov is a charismatic guy who attracts devotees and detractors. I was quite shocked by comments in an ultra-orthodox blog which show how how one man's couture can incite such anger.
http://www.vosizneias.com/2008/03/brooklyn-ny-line-of-clothing-for-woman.html
From a completely different worldview, ecofashionista blogger Starre enjoyed the show and praised Okunov for recycling materials. http://eco-chick.com/2008/03/30/1041/
Anonymous
What's so subversive...
What's so subversive about dressing up underfed women in scanty clothing - even if the clothing happens to be made out of what the Torah is dressed in? This is not mysticism - it's objectification. As a Jewish woman, and a feminist, I really don't understand how this is mystical - it feels to me like it's simply echoing and appropriating from a culture which sensationalizes and de-sanctifies women's bodies by objectifying them and holding them up to an impossible (and impossibly emaciated) standard.
This is not saying, or making, something new. Far from it.
If the half naked people dressed as Torahs were men, Jay, in red velvet loincloths, would you still say that Levi's work is "taking seriously the power of sexuality that makes religion worth doing in the first place -- and worth stealing back from the pious."? Seriously? I'm listening.
Anonymous
Re: What's so subversive
Translation of Anonymous 04/01/08 3:26 PM's post:
"Blah blah lookit me, I'm a knee-jerk rigidly ideological feminist blah blah objectification blah blah everything in the world's a conspiracy against women blah blah women shouldn't be allowed to dress scantily blah blah only Victorian clothing should be allowed and anyone who disagrees with me hates women even if they're women themselves."
Shtetlegirl
great art therpay project...
A. I agree with the first anonymous- nothing new about this.
B. I think the designs (or complete lack there of) are ugly as sin- no pun intended. I would not call this guy an artist but some guy who abviously had a bad jewish experience and needs to let it out...It was probably a good art therapy project for him...
C. "Translation of Anonymous at 4:24"...loser -grow up
Jon
Reb Zalman's artice
Michael,
Do you have a link to Reb Zalman's article? Thanks.
Post new comment