![]() |
Miley's PR Mileage |
|
| The "Hannah Montana" starlet's full of sparkle-studded shit | ||
by Michael Weiss, April 30, 2008 |
||
Age of Consent: Miley CyrusIs it because there is always delight in the semitranslucent mystery, the flowing charshaf, through which the flesh and the eye you alone are elected to know smile in passing at you alone? Or is it because I can imagine so well the rest of the colorful classroom around my dolorous and hazy darling: Grace, and her ripe pimples; Ginny and her lagging leg; Gordon the haggard masturbator; Duncan the foul-smelling clown; nail-biting Agnes; Viola of the blackheads and the bouncing bust; pretty Rosaline; dark Mary Rose; adorable Stella, who has let strangers touch her; Ralph, who bullies and steals; Irving for whom I am sorry. And there she is there, lost in the middle, gnawing on a pencil, detested by teachers, all the boys' eyes on her hair and neck, my Lolita.
I find the budding scandal, as it were, of Ms. Miley Cyrus's photo spread in Vanity Fair to be as ridiculous as the fact that no one would touch V. Nabokov's manuscript in 1955 except The Olympia Press, Maurice Girodias's hothouse imprint located on the Isle of Wight, and future publisher of Valerie Solanas's S.C.U.M. manifesto, which would have made Humbert Humbert cackle. Now that the unfinished and malformed Original of Laura looks well on its way to being typeset, thanks to Ron Rosenbaum and Vladimir's spectral influence in his son Dmitri's decision-making, it seems as if the creator of Lolita is still needed to satirize American culture's titillated puritanism and faux outrage. A week ago I didn't know who Cyrus was ("Hannah Montana" sounds like an Orthodox right-wing militia), and now I know that she's three years too old to be ranked a proper nymphet but mature enough to milk an "I have sinned!" PR kerfuffle for all it's worth:
“I took part in a photo shoot that was supposed to be ‘artistic’ and now, seeing the photographs and reading the story, I feel so embarrassed. I never intended for any of this to happen and I apologize to my fans who I care so deeply about.”
As for those new fans in truck stop men's rooms and dentist's offices, Miley thinks this grape-juice tastes funny. What's more newsworthy, that Disney has some explaining to do to a phalanx of angry mommy bloggers or that the New York Times had to append this correction to its story about the whole pre-fab controversy?
A headline and an article on Monday about a Vanity Fair photograph showing the actress
Miley Cyrus in a suggestive pose left the incorrect impression that she was bare-breasted. While the pose was indeed revealing, she was wrapped in what appeared to be a bedsheet; she was not topless.
Now how many eager beavers rushed right out and bought a copy of Graydon's glossy after running their eyes over the misleading headline?
Also, a word to the Cyrus household: Annie Leibovitz doesn't do wholesome.
![]() |
Michael is a contributing editor of Jewcy and the New York editor of Pajamas Media. His work has appeared in Slate, New York, Democratiya, The New Criterion and The Weekly Standard. His blog is More... |
Maayan
Ms. Disney sensation
sharonmgg
Kinda feel sorry for the kid...
I bet when this girl got into the whole having-your-own-tv-show-with-Disney thing, she didn't know that when she got to be around 14 or 15, the last thing she would need was the whole world watching her experiment with sex. I mean, I would hate for the world to know what got up to when I was 15, and I wasn't a juvenile delinquent by any stretch.
Of course, maybe that's because there's this myth (perhaps made by parents? talk to me in a few years, who knows, perhaps I'll want to believe it too) that there are some kids out there, some mysterious children, who hit adolescence with absolutely no need to discover anything about sex at all. But maybe Annie Leibowitz should have shown this photo only to Miley herself. She is still a kid, and thus a bit too inexperienced to understand that there is such a thing as privacy, and that she might benefit from protecting it.
Anonymous
Maayan, all the kids heard
Maayan, all the kids heard of it right away. There is a lot of communicating out there, Maayan. And you have a dead nerve here, about the impact of this image. You are tone deaf. Maayan. She is FIFTEEN. You are protecting your religious mythology that "it's all fine, it's all fine, la la la I can't hear you, I have fingers in my ears, it's all fine, a wholesome, harmless act, no problem, all well, nothing to get hung about". Maybe not?
JewcyCraig
Anonymous. A thought. Anonymous.
Anonymous, everyone knows Custer died at Little Big Horn. Anonymous. What this comment presupposes is: Maybe he didn't?
Anonymous.
Anonymous
No, his death is a fact.
No, his death is a fact. This thread is about opinion. How to look at the sexualization of people under legal consent age is discussable , debatable. Where is your fact? Is everything you think is harmless really harmless? Are you sure? For everybody? Equally? What exactly should be done with a fifteen year old? They seem mature but they are not. Should anybody care about that?
JewcyCraig
Well, I guess they should
sharonmgg
Anonymous - perhaps you're not getting the point
You may find that if you restart the meds your posts won't contain so many non sequiturs. And what's with the Anonymous already? Make a profile and c'mon in, the water's fine.
Post new comment