Posts

Feminists Fatales

By Michael Weiss / May 17, 2007

Here's how "Type III" female genital mutilation works: First you cut off the clitoris with a pair of shearers. The sound, according to Ayaan Hirsi Ali, who was subjected to this ritual at the age of five, in Saudi Arabia, is like a butcher's scissor snipped through fat. Next, you take a sharp stone and proceed the scrape away at the wound and the surrounding labia, the fleshy remains of which are then stitched together with twine. The girl's legs must be tied together for two to six weeks to prevent her from rupturing the stitches. If she survives the ordeal — and she may not due to poor hygenic conditions and the chance of developing a lethal infection — she'll have a raw carapace where her vagina used to be.  The inferior part of the vulva will then be perforated with a pencil-sized hole to allow for the passage of urine and, when she's ready, menstrual fluid.

No anathesia is administered at any point during the procedure and the subsequent period of convalescence.

Type III female genital mutilation is known as "infibulation." 

[Eve] Ensler has firsthand knowledge of the unique horrors of Islamic gender fascism. But her "feminist theory" obliterates distinctions between what goes on in Afghanistan and what goes on in Beverly Hills:

I went from Beverly Hills where women were getting vaginal laser rejuvenation surgery–paying four thousand dollars to get their labias trimmed to make them symmetrical because they didn't like the imbalance. And I flew to Kenya where [women were working to stop] the practice of female genital mutilation. And I said to myself, "What is wrong with this picture?"

A better question is: What is wrong with Eve Ensler? These two surgical phenomena are completely different in both scale and purpose. The number of American women who undergo "vaginal labial rejuvenation" is minuscule: There were 793 such procedures in 2005, according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons. By contrast, a World Health Organization 2000 fact sheet reports: "Today, the number of girls and women who have undergone female genital mutilation is estimated at between 100 and 140 million. It is estimated that each year, a further 2 million girls are at risk of undergoing FGM."

Just a taste of the poverty of American feminism when it comes to showing solidarity — or even just demonstrating a grave moral concern — for the blighted women of the Islamic third world. Christina Hoff Sommers has a devastating cover story in the Weekly Standard. Read it.

POST A COMMENT

  • By Anonymous 5/27/07 at 7:48 a.m. UTC

    Josh are you saying that not all Muslims are fascists and genital mutilators? Do you any have evidence to back that up sir?

  • Josh Strawn
    By Josh Strawn 5/25/07 at 3:45 p.m. UTC

    Anonymous: Michael's too kind to you.  He's mastered the art of gracefully letting windbags blow wind and spending time on more worthwhile things.  Me on the other hand?  Not so much.  Speaking of obfuscating the truth for another goal…did you notice the only mention of Islam was in the last three sentences–sentences whose function within the post was to summarize the article to which he was directing the audience?  If you click on the article, you'll notice his description is faithful to the piece.  Real quick (and you aren't allowed to Google it)–who is Shirin Ebadi?  Mukhtar Mai?  If you actually know, then you only lose points for making absurd leaps in order to mischaracterize Mr. Weiss as a Muslim basher.  If you don't know, you lose double, since you know more about neoconservative politicians and their favorite philosophers than you do about Muslim women's rights activists. It's an objective fact that nothing in this posting attributes FGM solely to Muslims.  It merely states that Ms. Hirsi Ali's experience took place in a Muslim country and that Hoff's article draws attention to the lack of participation by Western feminists in the struggle for Muslim women's rights.  Both are true.  There is no question that FGM is not Islamic as much as it is regional, nor is it practiced by anything larger than a minority of Muslims.  There is also no question that the practice is given Qu'ranic justification in the places where Muslims practice it, and there is nothing sensible about speaking of FGM outside of the cultural context in which it takes place.  Spousal abuse is probably a cultural universal as well, but in adressing the issue with care and specificity, one would be amiss if they failed to account for the cultural influence and context.  Just because one speaks about spousal abuse in Idaho, are they saying that domestic violence is a strictly Idahoan phenomenon?  Of course not.  This is where people who think they are watchdogs for prejudice against Muslims do something weird–they treat Islam as if it has some bizarre power to subsume all items and ideas around it into itself.  If I write about cars in Islamic culture, do I therefore imply that all cars are Islamic?  Of course not!!!  But if somebody speaks of fascism or FGM in Islamic society, they are accused of suggesting that all Muslims are fascists and genital mutilators.  Nothing could be further from the truth!            

  • Izzy Grinspan
    By Izzy Grinspan 5/21/07 at 2:53 p.m. UTC

    Wait, what was that about feminists not caring about the Middle East?

     

  • François Blumenfeld-Kouchner
    By François Blumenfeld-Kouchner 5/18/07 at 6:24 p.m. UTC

    Anonymous,

    (1) I don't see in any way how the article you quote supports your claim, on the opposite it seems to imply that the prevalence of FGM amongst Ethiopian Jews prior to arrival in Israel, if anything, is smaller than could have been thought, and does in any case confirm that the practice seems to have been abandoned upon emigration; here's from the same article's abstract: "Ethiopian Jewish women immigrants to Israel report that ritual female genital surgery was normative in their culture in Ethiopia, but expressed no desire to continue the custom in Israel. This contrasts with Israeli Bedouin Muslims, who were reported to regard ritual female genital surgery as an important part of their identity. Physical examination of 113 Ethiopian Jewish immigrant women in Israel found a variety of lesions in about a third of women, with 27% showing total or partial clitoral amputation. The heterogeneity of the physical findings contrasts with uniform verbal reports in interviews of having undergone a ritual of female genital surgery." (2) I don't see Michael 'propagating the false myth' anywhere above. At the end of the article, he emphasises the case for women in the Islamic world because, well, that's where FGM is prevalent in 'geographical' terms. I'm pretty sure Michael is not advocating for discrimination against Muslim women: what he's doing is, on the contrary, defending some particularly vulnerable people. (3) I haven't been "defending Ethiopian Jews from the charge of practicing FGM," as any honest reader could gather from my comment, which I'm afraid I'm going to have to quote here: "Your claim regarding Ethiopian Jews, however, seems to be valid mostly, if not only, for those that remain in Ethiopia." In other words, if this was unclear, this means what you said is right for the Ethiopian Jews in Ethiopia (for those in Israel, see (1) above). I'm not religious myself, and neither is Weiss as I gather from his declarations on this site, and am therefore strongly suspicious of your attack on "Jewish propanganda." However, your own uniformed comment that "only Africans…mutilate women" is a definite show of bias: Africa may be the region where FGM is prevalent, but it also happens in Asia and the Middle East (actually, if you have read the article you're quoting, you'll know that some Bedouins practice FGM): http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs241/en/
  • By Anonymous 5/18/07 at 2:44 p.m. UTC

    Here’s what I found:
    “Upon physical examination of the other group, Ethiopian Jews, which resides now in Israel and performed female genital mutilation in Ethiopia, 63% of the women, who all claimed to have been circumcised, did not even have a scar! 20% had scars, in 7%, one square centimeter of the labia minora was removed from beneath the clitoris and only 10% demonstrated a real and severe form of female genital mutilation, total amputation of the clitoris.

    Grisaru N, Letzer S, Belmaker RH.
    Ritual Female Genital Surgery Among Ethiopian Jews.
    Arch Sex Behav 1997;26:211-5.”

    Looks like some Ethiopian Jews still practice FGM. Francois, while defending Ethiopian Jews from the charge of practicing FGM, you did not take on your friend Weiss for propagating the false myth that only Muslims practice FGM, when only Africans, whether Muslims, Christians or Jews mutilate women. Talk about Jewish propaganda.

  • François Blumenfeld-Kouchner
    By François Blumenfeld-Kouchner 5/17/07 at 9:32 p.m. UTC

    Dear Old Anonymous,

    Thank you for your comment -very instructive. I did think that FGM was an ethnic practice with strong ties to Islam in some areas of the world -which I think is indeed the case. It is indeed worthy to note that it is not religion-exclusive.
    Your claim regarding Ethiopian Jews, however, seems to be valid mostly, if not only, for those that remain in Ethiopia. I did not find any thoroughly reliable source through a cursory internet search, but the consensus emerging through the following seems to be that Ethiopian Jews having moved to Israel abandoned FGM en masse (if only by the apparent absence of any evidence to the persistence of the practice after emigration):
  • By Anonymous 5/17/07 at 7:39 p.m. UTC

    Michael Weiss, did you know that Ethiopian Jews also practice female genital mutilation? That Christians also practice genital mutilation in Africa? That FGM is not an exclusively Muslim practice? that most Muslims don’t practice FGM? Since you claim to be such a smart guy, I suppose you already know this, but you like to slam Muslims every chance you get. Just like your Straussian idol Wolfowitz, obfuscating the truth in the pursuit of a larger Zionist goal comes very easily to you.

Wanna post your own comments?