Tue, May 13, 2008

User login

The “Eat Pray Love” Backlash Strikes Again

 

Elizabeth Gilbert: Emotional-adventure pornographer?Elizabeth Gilbert: Emotional-adventure pornographer?If Elizabeth Gilbert were a man, would the plot of Eat Pray Love seem quite as charming and relatable? Rolf Potts, writing on a travel site called World Hum, doesn’t think so. Here’s an excerpt from his pitch for the male equivalent:

I start by going to Italy, where I eat a lot of pasta, drive around and take some naps. I also study the language with a cute, younger Italian woman, and I frequently fantasize about having sex with her and her equally cute twin sister. I extol the virtues of these Italian women, who know how to treat their men—selflessly lavishing them with love and making them the center of attention. I pointedly ponder how nice it would be if the American women in my life had had the awareness to treat me that way.

Potts postulates that Eat Pray Love is a female version of 1950’s era adventure porn, which appealed to office-trapped men with its stories of danger in exotic lands. Women, he argues, are more interested in traveling inward:

The legacy of “adventure porn,” I think, is not the kind of adventure writing you see in Outside magazine, but books like “Eat, Pray, Love.” Instead of wrestling crocodiles in distant lands, our protagonist wrestles despair; instead of exploring rivers, she explores emotions; instead of surviving disease, she survives heartbreak. Men occasionally appear in this survivor’s tale, but they are as one-dimensional as adventure-porn wenches, and mainly serve as a sounding board for the protagonist’s feelings. When these men are giving our heroine love and help, she gushes with admiration; when they can’t intuit her emotional needs, she reacts with despair (and vague contempt). Rarely does she ponder what—besides emotional availability to her—might motivate these men in day-to-day life.

If he's right, Eat Pray Love certainly isn't alone. A lot of books/movies/TV shows aimed at women don't spent much time on the emotional lives of their male characters. (Can you imagine being friends—not sex-friends, but buddies—with any of the Sex in the City men, for example? I could maybe hang out with Steve for half an hour if drinking was involved, but that’s it.) Of course, the inverse is even more common. Plenty of movies and books for male audiences have one-dimensional female characters. But is that any excuse?

Previously: Eat Pray Backlash?



Izzy Grinspan is Jewcy's managing editor. Her work has been published in Salon, The Believer, and The Village Voice.


More...
 

Maayan


Male characters

I think it's largely because women that read or watch this particular genre, identify more with female characters and would rather imagine what the male characters are like on their own. Give them false identities.  By the writers not describing the men's lives in depth, viewers, like the female characters, can't get too attached.  Or maybe it's that on Sex and the City part of the philosophy of the main characters is that they never seem to get too attached to any of the characters in the earlier episodes largely because they are men that just seem to come and go and this helps women further falsify their stereotypes about men.  For this reason, I don't think a book such as Eat Love and Pray would be any better if told from a man's perspective, however I do think it would be interesting!



David Strauss


A few notes on gender-flipping

It's not really fair to flip the genders in a statement because they're not just variables, they're imbued with context:

(1) "As a woman, I feel my competition against males in the workplace is handled unfairly."

(2) "As a man, I feel my competition against women in the workplace is handled unfairly."

The first statement implies a sort of glass ceiling for women, given the history of discrimination. The second statement isn't so clear: it could be implying that he's aware of discrimination against women or that he's against something like an affirmative action policy.

And this isn't just an issue of history: psychological profiles vary. When we judge someone for expressing a sexual intention, we judge them by how we expect them to pursue that intention (in addition to other ways). The author of the book clearly has a gentleness and calm the reader gathers from the surrounding pages, versus, from the example, some random guy saying he wants to fuck a girl and her sister. So, what do we expect this random American guy to do in pursuit of the sisters? What would we expect of the author? Hint: only one involves roofies.

And, yes, I'm aware that the change in meaning draws on its own stereotypes, but it is not the book that has created them.





Anonymous


Eat Love Pray

   What's the big deal? I thought the book was great!  Gilbert does what a lot of women would wish they had the guts to do!  Her style was witty and very entertaining.





Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <cite> <code> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.