Posts

Fishman–I am here to remind you that EQUITY is the by-word of the socialist–they almost never say they are being fair.  They demand equality for anything and everything that is not equal–equal outcomes for unequal ability and effort.

Equality of opportunity is fair.  But they want equality of outcome which is inherent unfair.

Do not cop out Papa Alex–you do not have to stick to your gun.

At this point in the Bush Presidency–the electorate did something pretty unprecedented in modern history.  The GOP picked up seats in Congress in an off-year election.  By contrast, Obama is so polarizing–so contemptible among the people–clear majorities are poised to undue the damage he has done.

As for your question–the Left wants control and control means the people are damaged. Please consider what happened in the former Soviet Union under Lenin and Stalin.  Please consider what happens inn Venezuela under Chavez.  Centralized control means the people are runined the state wins.  This GREED for power is intoxicating.  Why doesn’t Obama want what is good for America–probably because he does not love America or our ideals.  Regarding health care for example–no one would object to finding additonal ways to cover the unisured or to find ways to stop Medicare from being such a disaster.  Adults understand Medicare is bankrupting an already bankrupt nation.  But Obama is no adult–he does not care what is happening–he does not see it because he believes it is impossible that a Federal program can do such harm.  He is in denial as you are in denial.  Social Security is bankrupt–the idea is unconstitutional–the entire concept is immoral and stupid–it exists purely as a slush fund.  There are ways to help insure all Americans–it is a tiny problem–Obama has arranged it so it is a huge problem and EVERYONE suffers.  He has arranged it so everyone must pay much higher prices for insurance and the quality of care will go down and down.  This has happened in all the socialist utopias.  Therefore, yes, it is understandable that he wants bankruptcy–he wants continual crises because under crisis–the state can take more and more control.  

So why does Obama believe in socialist utopias?  He is a poorly educated sick, twisted individual.  He wants what he wants because of his ineptitude and lack of experience in the real world.  He is a commited leftist and please don’t say I create my own reality.  I am no ivory tower idiot–that is Obama’s description.  How low will we go?  He does not care.  As a man of reality, a man of pragmatism–I care deeply that almost 20% of the nation is unemployed.  As a small businessman, I care that all businesses have a tiny group of clients still interested in spending money and when we face the biggest tax increase in 60 years in 2011–that pool of buyers will stop and slow down as well.

Jack Bauer is fictional.  The elctorate must be allowed to speak and it is best to have the kind of good will that honors the people for initiatives that affect the people so directly.  He is not that person of good will.  Bush was such a person–he had no need to get the whole world behind him in his drive to remove a brutal dictator from power–he could have just made the order as Commander in Chief.  He did not.  America always needs that kind of leader who will not trample on the will of the people.  Obama is a Lenin wannabe.  He despises the Constitution and famously said (nothing Obama says is widely reported–it is disguised)–he disparages a Constitution of negative rights and wants a Constitution that gives "rights" to the government so the government can do what it wants to do.  This kind of blank check for the government is the very opposite of the American spirit. His stand against the Constitution brings us legally towards, in the direction of, the totalitarianism of a Hitler or Lenin.  It is the biggest offense imaginable and the people let him get away from it–some assuming that the good will of the past will carry us through his desires–and the desires of future statists.

It takes very little time to create widespread damage and wreck a beautiful thing.  It will take years to rebuild from the damage he has done.

Please do not let him do any more harm.  We are bleeding all over the place.  This is the time to run as fast as we can in another direction–towards prosperity and freedom instead of towards all power to the state.

 Please, Papa–I said "irrational"–I must say it straight.

Papa:  the man who single handedly subverted the Kyoto Accords

Resp.  No–the US Congress voted overwhelmingly against this crazy treaty which would constrain only the US and give China and India free reign. 

a fruitless effort to privatize Social Security, aradical, irresponsible plan that, after his bankrupting of our treasury and the crash on Wall Street that soon followed, would have cost millions of American stheir economic retirement security. 

Resp.  Bush did not attempt to privatize SS.  He attempted to save the program and not end it.  Hence, his plan is consistent with lame, moderate plans to save the worst program ever created.  The Bush plan merely allowed some Americans to take a small part of their money out.  This program now must be phased out completely–now.  No more moderate NICE plans.

bankrupting the country with huge tax breaks for the very rich

Resp.  But this is wrong on both counts and hence irrational.  The tax cuts were scrupuously across the board and gave the economy a huge boost.  Conversely–cancelling those tax cuts will not crash an economy Obama has already driven down the toilet.  Bush brought us prosperity with the tax cuts (his spending caused a deficit–lead by Democratic proposals he did not have the guts to veto).

stealing an election

Resp.  Of course if was Gore who attempted to steal on election.  Bush was declared the winner in every count and every re-count.  Gore was not a winner in any possible scenerio.  Gore used the courts to try to steal an election who could not win honestly and deprived the nation of an elected President.  The Supreme Court had to step in to stop the efforts by the Gore team to steal an election and finally–Bush was given the nod in Florida that was already certified.  By contrast, lawlessness gave Al FRanken a victory when Coleman won the election.  Franken was able to use ACORN’s illegal votes–thousands of them–to give him a victory that was not there–he cheated to steal an election.  Harry Reid wants to do the same thing.  This is how Kennedy won Cook County and the Dems have a lot of practice on getting the votes of dead people to count.

putting cronies in key positions, where their inept performance led to misery for millions and undermined somewhat important institutions like the Justice Department.

Resp.  What is this?  Like who.  Ashcroft?  Michael Mukassey?  These are superb people.  By contrast, we have people like Eric Holder and his team who spent a ton of hours trying to free terrorists.  He brings in "cronies" like Van Jones, and Elana Kagan who has no qualifications for the SCOTUS except that she LOVES BO–(that is a "crony" or a sycophant) Bush gave us superb justices like Roberts and Allito–two men he did not know–chosen on merit as the best available.

figuring out how to make healthcare available to the 50 million Americans who dont have it.

Resp.  But only 10-12 million Americans do not have health insurance and the Obama plan does nothing to address that problem.  It is a tax bill which ruins the health care for all Americans instead of helping to provide health care to those who do not and would like to have it. By passing Obama care–we have guaranteed that healthcare will be much more expensive and far less available to Americans.  This is Obama’s idea of what is right but it is NOT what his constituents want.  Americans want what the GOP is offering.  They were ripped offed and fooled.  The "benefits" are hidden until after 2012.  This is why this must be repealed.  Over 60% actually want it repealed. It is a scam.

Treasury Sec. Hank Paulson, Sept. 2008, announcing a dire need for an emergency bailout and warning “the whole thing(our economy) could go down…”)

Resp.  But it was Paulson’s leutenant Geithner who prepared that plan and it was the GOP who opposed it.  Obama wanted that plan and he chose the architect to take over and continue it.   he sat back and let Dick Cheney and Rumsfeld take us into a war under false pretenses Resp.  More irrational blather.  The US Congress brought us into the war against Iraq.  Bush had the integrity to have more than one vote in Congress for the war –even though as Commander in Chief–he did not need to get a majority.  He wanted a supermajority.  He got 74 votes in the Seanate and had over 76% of the lectorate in favor of it.  When it is most controversial, he stood for re-election on that war and was re-elected.  Hence, it is more than irrational–it is psychotic to ramble on and on about how America was tricked into the war in Iraq.  By contrast, Obamacare is incredibly unpopular in America–only 34% want it and the numbers are still dropping.  Obama wanted no supermajority–he could care less if it is incredibly unpopular although it affects everyone–unlike the war which is the President’s purview.  Obama did not even want one vote.  Ditto for the "stimulus"  (a pile of pok spending that is more than simply wasteful)–opposed by the people–rammed down our throats.  Further–the left always forgets that liberal leader in England Blair put his career on the line for the war in Iraq–and so did all of our true allies.  Only the left in America and some Arab states did not want the war in Iraq (besides all the regular America haters).  France and Germany came around and supported it. cruelly preaching abstinence to those suffering from AIDS in Africa instead of offering the aid they needed and deservedResp. This is not only irrational–it is sick.  Bush spent millions for AIDS victims in Africa. OK, Papa–you have been refuted–please get a smaller type style.

OK, Papa Alex–I suppose you are actually being serious.  But to be plain, you are just another poor brainwashed "drone" as Mark Levin likes to call your type.  It is truly sad to encounter people who live in an echo chamber with radicals polluting a brain.

I have come forward to say that it is not at this point fairminded to link Obama, Hitler and Lenin as a trio and that despite the fact Obama is pleased to lead this formerly great nation towards totalitarianism–he has not done this and God willing, he will soon be prevented from damaging us further.  This is the difference–an economic collapse gave Hitler his opening.  The overthrough of a monarchy gave Lenin his.  America has a good chance of snapping out of this Obama-created great recession–reverse his initiatives–end his race to sending us to the bottom of the toilet and rebuild again by turning the nation right in the opposite direction.  I am here therefore to break company with my fellow conservatives who believe it is too late, we will soon be facing the kind of economic collapse and total poverty propogated by Lenin and his "revolution."   Unlike them, I take some solace in the fact America is poised to repudiate this sick man–completely unqualified to lead any nation–much less the leading nation of the world.

Alas, I am optimistic.  By contrast, there is no argument–not even any good lies that can justify calling President Bush "Hitler" and yet you, Papa Alex,  have come forward, under an assumed name, to actually do that *not* by simply using the familiar Bush is Hitler accusation but by formulating an elaborate and completly irrational Keith Obermann-style baseless diatribe.

A potential totalitarian who is a statist does not make Obama Lenin or Hitler.  It ONLY means he is going quickly in that direction.  By contrast, A President who ran consistently as a moderate–who was elected not once but re-elected–who was a chronic disappointment to conservatives since he was not a conservative–a man who tried very hard to unite the country–a man of total decency and honesty–even if he was a poor leader and failed to promote conservatism gave us a record level of economic growth, a good tax cut which boosted the economy and brought us to quickly rebound after 9/11 wrecked the economy and was a respectable President.  Of all things–Bush was NOT a totalitarian.  The "Hitler" line about Bush is so-off base it makes zero sense. 

I thank the Jewcy staff for admitting this but it would have been good to say it when it mattered–and not simply to give cover to a current President who is looking more and more every day like Lenin or Hitler–he just has not made it there yet.

America is not quiet about what is happening to this nation–sinking quickly with the senseless spending and policies of this regime–we are convulsing.  We cannot believe he is so cold–so oblivious to the fact he is killing us–because he is not cold–he wants high unemployment, high taxes, high energy prices, growing poverty, low productivity, and a nation sapped of hope.  Obama’s "Audacity of a Dope" was rammed through because the Gop ran a bad candidate and many figured "how bad could he be?"  The nation has found out just how bad and they are finally waking up.  No…we are not "All Socialists Now!!"–America–I hope is coming back –it would be an incredible turnaround from the endless morass that now faces us–thanks to Obama’s reckless spending and economic illiteracy. 

Next time, we will ask for a resume and some good recommendations. But more so–we will not seek out and elevate a guy who sees himself and acts more like Lenin and Hitler and not at all like Churchill or Reagan.  Even the liberal Jews are catching on–miracles can happen.