![]() |
Among The Hillary Haters In Philadelphia |
|
| A Tour Through A Section Of Pennsylvania Bitterly Opposed To The New York Senator | ||
by Ali Eteraz, April 18, 2008 |
||
Sign seen in Philadelphia
I had a meeting this morning and I was running late. I
realized I had missed the bus and there were no cabs to be found. I started
walking towards Center City all while hoping I’d miraculously run into a lost
cabbie. Didn’t happen. I stopped at a busy intersection, pulled out a five
dollar bill and started approaching cars.
“Five bucks if you drop me at Market Street.”
After suffering glares from a couple of old people and
making a couple of frightened girls zoom off – I shouldn’t have had my
hood up – I found an African-American guy in an Explorer, listening to
Ne-Yo, pulled up and let me in.
“I’m in a good mood today,” he said.
I got in. After a brief lull in conversation I reminded him
that later in the day Obama
Remember, It's The City Of *Brother*ly Love: Apparently Hillary Clinton's ovaries, as well as her tactics, are costing her votes in Philadelphia would be holding a major rally near the Liberty
Bell.
“You gonna vote?” I asked.
“Hell yeah,” he said.
“Who for?”
“Obama!”
“Why?” I asked.
“I don’t trust a woman to be President,” he said.
I was shocked. Here was a black guy not voting for Obama
because the junior senator references
Jay-Z in his speeches.
That was sarcasm, by the way.
I egged him in a little bit and found that he didn’t particularly
have a reason for supporting Obama aside from the fact that Hillary was a
woman.
“Well, also because that’s what my Church wants me to vote,”
he said.
I probably should have stopped and inquired whether it was
his Church that was feeding him the line about Hillary’s gender. But I had
reached my stop. I paid him and scampered off.
(Yes, I did make my meeting on time).
***
I found my morning encounter interesting because of another
experience involving Obama and Hillary.
One night, three of us – me, one Princeton graduated
white guy in Big Pharma, and a middle class Indian lawyer – got in a cab
being driven by an African immigrant. He heard us talking about politics and
asked us who we were voting for.
“I’m leaning towards Obama,” I said.
My Indian friend – a former Republican – said he
was totally for Obama, while the white guy said that he would support anyone
who didn’t raise his taxes.
“So two Obama and one McCain?” the cabbie confirmed. “Why
not Hillary?”
Before I could answer, he answered his own question.
“I tell you why, man! She lies about every policy. Voted for
war, says she’s against it. Says she’s for little guy, is in bed with
corporations.”
“So you’ll vote for Obama, then?” I asked.
“No man, I can’t vote,” he replied. He wasn’t yet a citizen.
However, he assured the three of us that every passenger he picked up he would
try to convert them away from Hillary.
“Even McCain is better than her,” said the cabbie who
can’tvote.
***
A few days earlier, I was taking a trip out to the sub-urbs
to see one of my friends. I went to 30th Street train station and
waited for my train to arrive. In the meantime, I saw a couple of Obama
activists approaching the travelers. To pass the time, my friend and I went up
to them.
“Pretend to be a Hillary supporter,” I told him.
He went up (naturally) to the cute girl and started
peppering her with questions about Obama as well as dropping positive
commentary about Hillary.
She argued with him fervently. Ultimately, though, her
argument could be summed up in one line: “How can you trust Hillary? She’s just
not trust-worthy.”
Not wanting to be left out of talking to the cute girl I
chimed in: “That’s an interesting accent you got there. Where are you from?”
“Oxford University,” she said. “I’m a visiting student at
Penn.”
When the train arrived, we walked away. As we left, the girl
who couldn’t vote in the elections reminded us again that Hillary was untrustworthy.
***
Hillary hate is pretty high in Philadelphia. It’s not just
the Churches, and the cabbies, and the rich Penn kids. It also infects the
right-wing anti-abortion activists.
When I was returning from the aforementioned meeting earlier I got
on a bus that went past the historic City Hall.
At a distance, hanging between two light-poles, right next to
the Masonic Temple, were two tremendous signs.
The letters were in black, except for the word ‘Jezebel’, in
parentheses.
“HILLARY (Jezebel) KILLS BABIES” read the first sign. The
second one featured a gruesome picture of a dismembered fetus.
After I pushed down the bile in my throat, I asked myself
why the sign didn’t say anything about Obama. After all, he, like Hillary, is
also pro-Choice.
***
It was at that point that the germs for this article began
coming to my head. It appeared that no one had particular
reasons for their Obamamania other than the fact that they hated Hillary.
I also begin asking myself. If Obama’s support in Philadelphia – a relatively well-educated and progressive city – is premised on such irrationality, then can’t it be the case that in other parts of the country, support for Hillary or McCain or even Bush, is also premised on irrationality and closed-mindedness? If so, what does it really say about politics in America? Is it really the case that our leaders are bankrupt or is it that our leaders are a reflection of ourselves; even, dare I say, Obama?
Brett
Pernicious Sexism
Ugh. "She's a woman, how could she be trust worthy?" Why don't they just go all out and pull the "I don't trust anything that bleeds for a week and doesn't die" sexist, bullshit rhetoric.
I personally haven't decided one way or the other; I'm supporting the Democratic nominee. I could listen to policy debate all day, not a problem. But these comments prove to me that this nation has come MUCH farther in dealing with racism than it has sexism.
I need my hookah...
James Stanhope
Irrationality: Reading data so as to confirm preexisting biases
As to the "irrationality" cited by Ali Eteraz in his final paragraph, my suspicion is that, in 2008, profound risk aversion is determining voters' choices. The current U.S. foreign policy debacles have left voters so paranoid that they don't trust their own ability to make rational choices. In particular, voters don't trust their ability in interpret new data about anything, but especially about candidates, in such a way that would lead them to risk changing their vote. The result is that voters irrationally cling to their initial "branding" of the candidates themselves and will probably vote accordingly.
This risk aversion in interpreting data is an exacerbation of a typical human trait shown in studies cited by Nicholas Kristof in his online New York Times column dated April 17, 2008, entitled "Divided They Fall." These studies reveal that audiences, who were selected for their known preexisting preference for a certain outcome, would interpret new data in such a way that the data confirmed their previous preference, regardless of the actual content of the data.
Risk aversion is the only way I myself can make sense of the repeated poll findings showing that a substantial minority of Obama and Clinton supporters would vote for McCain if their preferred Democratic candidate was not nominated. My guess is that such Democratic voters are intensely invested in an initial branding of Hillary Clinton as untrustworthy, Obama as inexperienced, and McCain as "authentic," and are so risk-averse that rather than tolerate the uncertainty involved in voting against their initial branding of the candidates, they will vote for the candidate whom they feel least unsafe with, which would be McCain. That, I think, explains the irrationality noted in Ali Eteraz's post.
Anonymous
Ali the Remedial Pundit
Here we witness Ali Eteraz, whom you'd expect might have a passing interest in philosophy, practicing the fallacy of composition all over the place.
I suggest you go back to the drawing boards of political science and locate the finding that equates a perception of longstanding mendacity in a democratic political figure with a hatred for them that is "irrational".
The sexism card is pretty smarmy too. Of course, we all know at least as many Americans won't support Obama because he's black and has the middle name "Hussein", but the difference is that Hillary's campaign led an effort to exacerbate these irrelevant biases through surrogates such as Bob Kerrey, Robert Johnson and Mark Penn, photos distributed to the Drudge Report of Obama in Sudanese dress, ad infinitum, ad nauseam, whereas Obama's did not.
You know you're capable of better, so what was your point with this drivel? Feeling uninspired? Needed to meet a promised deadline? The approach and logic in this piece is more emblematic of Ali G than the highlights he inserts into his biography would suggest that you'd expect.
Anonymous
Among the Hillary haters in Philadelphia
i don't know much about american politics, but the us presidential race has recieved quite a bit of air time here in australia, so i know about how obama is willing to strike at pakistan if he has to, does that not concern you? and if not, why not?
Bunk
General observation on the political climate...
The debate on whether Clinton or Obama would be a better president is moot. Why would anyone vote for a self-described Socialist?
There is another issue that has confounded me. Why does a large majority of the Jewish community give support to a political party that openly states that the U.S. should abandon the fight in the middle east? As a presbyterian Goy, I believe Israel has a right to exist and to defend herself, but do you really think that if the U.S. military were pulled out, as both Clinton and Obama have indicated they intend to do, that Israel would be better off? Do you really think that the U.S. would be better off by walking away from a smoldering fire without putting it out first?
Honest questions. No offense intended.
Uri
Hillary Hate
These are your examples of Hillary "Hate"? Clearly, you haven't seen the real thing. Unless people are starting off every sentence with "that bitch" and swearing profusely, I can guarantee you that you aren't even close to seeing how deep that cesspool goes.
Post new comment