Posts

Al Qaeda Calls Obama “House Negro”

After an election campaign in which the wingnut right tried repeatedly to raise the spectre of Barack Hussein Obama as crypto-Islamist sleeper sent by the terrorists to destroy the republic from within – a sort of Mohammedan candidate, if you … Read More

By / November 19, 2008

After an election campaign in which the wingnut right tried repeatedly to raise the spectre of Barack Hussein Obama as crypto-Islamist sleeper sent by the terrorists to destroy the republic from within – a sort of Mohammedan candidate, if you will – it’s kinda refreshing to see normal service resumed this morning, now that the newbie’s back to being attacked as a tool of the Jews. That, at least, is the subliminal message of Al Qaeda’s latest video message, in which Ayman Al-Zawahiri deploys what the media are coyly referring to as a “racial epithet” to describe the President-elect:

 

The phrase that has caught everyone’s attention, of course, is the punchline; Obama is portrayed, like Colin and Condi, as compliant “house Negroes”, who in Malcolm X’s infamous categorization were too docile to rise up against their oppressors, unlike their counterparts “in the field”. (As news outlets have carefully pointed out, the Arabic word used in the message, “abed”, does not actually mean “Negro”, though it’s rendered as such in the subtitles. In fact it can mean either “slave” or “black”; Arabs use the same word fairly interchangeable for both ideas. One wonders what Malcolm would have made of that.)

Lest there was any doubt that he was sharing the Al Qaeda perspective on African-Americans’ long march to freedom, though, Zawahiri (if indeed it is he) hammers the real point home with characteristic subtlety:

“You were born to a Muslim father, but you chose to stand in the ranks of the enemies of the Muslims, and pray the prayer of the Jews”

…accompanied by obligatory photo of Obama wearing a kippah.

As a reminder that we are dealing with antediluvian minds, this is at least welcome, if (one would hope) redundant. But while the crass use of racially loaded language may jar horribly to western ears, at least we have some idea now of the narrative that Islamists intend to construct around America’s first mixed-race President, and the implicit threat to Muslims who seek accommodation with Israel and the West, rather than conflict.

Still, at least they didn’t call him an Uncle Tom. Endorsing McCain was bad enough, but if I thought Al Qaeda were Naderites I’d be starting to question their judgement.

Tagged with:
  • Barbara Reader

    The fact is that calling Obama a house slave (why are we coddling Al Quaeda’s racist comments?) and Nadar calling him an Uncle Tom come from the same place and go to the same place.

    In both situations, the name-caller has a thesis which has been undercut by Barack Hussain Obama, and they are trying, like magicians, to distract their audience from what’s going on.

    Nadar has run in the name of the downtrodden and the oppressed.  And if by that you mean the Palestistinian Arabs, that’s true.  If by that you mean the American poor, the victums of corporate excesses in the USA, that’s false. A real candidate with a background of representing the poor, a community organizer, the representative from Chicago’s South Side, could never be elected.  So Nadar runs… oops…

    Al Quaeda offers no solutions for the poor and the oppressed.  They are essentially the Arab Muslim equivalent of the KKK. But instead of claiming to represent White People they want you to think they represent Muslim People.  The West hates all thingsMuslim with a blood hatred.  They would not follow you, or the child of any Muslim… so Al Quaeda will help YOUR kids commit suicide… opps…

    Their fundimental thesises are undercut by Obama’s mere existance.  Obama may be our first Black President, but he is their black swan.  So, they do what any angry, hate-filled, empty headed person would do, they call him names.  In Al Quaeda’s case, I’m expecting a few assassination attempts.

    Nadar will just run again in 2012.

  • Ismail

    I congratulate Jewcy on having hired a humor columnist and look forward to more hilarity from Ms. Reader.

    I suggest adding horoscopes and a crossword puzzle next.

  • Isaac

    It would be one thing if all he were doing was offering an opinion. But I think we should be honest enough to admit that he was doing more than just that. He used the term "Uncle Tom" as a way to goad and demean Obama and all who see his win as a point of pride. And therefore, it was another stupid and fatuous political move on the part of someone who seems to be making a career out of such behavior. 

    But to take it further, no, he’s not an expert, Arab Americans cannot claim the legacy of the 3/5ths compromise and its other attendant evils, and men have an interesting habit of being more likely to oppose abortion than the gender that tends to carry fetuses to term. But once all those caveats (and any related to them for the purposes of this discussion) are acknowledged, I have no problem entertaining his or anyone else’s opinion on the matter. 

    It’s nice to see you again. I was starting to miss you.  

  • Ismail

    "Because Nader’s such an expert on what constitutes a betrayal of the hopes, dreams and aspirations of Black Americans, right?….To take your comment seriously, one would have to assume as much."

    Hello again, Isaac. 

    Why do you frame your disagreement with Nader in this way? Are you saying he’s not such an expert (which no one says he is-only that he has an opinion)? I hope you’re not suggesting that, as a demi-honkie (Arab heritage, remember), he is unqualified to pronounce upon matters racial. We hear a variant of this preposterous trope from women who think men’s opinions about abortion are less valid owing to that pesky Y chromosome, among others. You couldn’t be discounting someone’s opinion because of their melanin deficiencies, could you?

    If not, then what are you saying, other than that you disagree with the excellent Nader? 

  • Isaac

    Yes, Ismail!

    Because Nader’s such an expert on what constitutes a betrayal of the hopes, dreams and aspirations of Black Americans, right?

    To take your comment seriously, one would have to assume as much. And yet, to assume as much is what is rightly seen as an offensive affront to all sensibilities.

    Nader’s established quite a remarkable history by now of failing the political process. Unless he wants to continue finding newer and more interesting ways to turn his reputation into even greater piles of rubbish, he should acknowledge that his well-deserved legacy as a consumer advocate never translated into an effective political role, either as a politician or a pundit.

    Man, regardless of skin color or caste, does not live by bread alone. If anyone should realize that, you’d think that anti-corporate crusader Nader would.

  • Ismail

    The real story here is not that Zawahiri dissed Obama, but that Obama achieved the level of support in the Arab world that he did. This surely represents an epidemic of delusion about Obama’s progressive bona fides almost as significant as that which ran like wildfire through America’s Left community.

    Your swipe at Nader puzzles me. Nader believes that Obama’s policies will be bad for the poor, an exceptional number of whom in the US are African-American. More specifically, he believes that Obama has allied himself with corporate actors whose interests necessarily disadvantage the poor, and he has done this to further his own rise to power. 

    And, as Obama and his supporters have reminded us for years, his race is crucial to understanding who he is and what his significance to American politics represents. But surely this cuts both ways. If a black man acts against the interests of black people in general, this is properly seen as different in interesting ways from a white man’s doing the same. And if he is seen as doing so in an effort to cozy up to the forces responsible for his people’s miseries, well, history and literature have provided us with a pithy descriptor-Uncle Tom.

    Again, if an anti-Semitic holocaust denier happens to be Jewish, we raise an eyebrow just a tad higher than we would if she were not, and if literature provided us with a model for such a person, rather than the clunky "self-hating jew", we would use it. Yet again, we have a word for Jewish betrayers of Jews-kapo- while Gentile betrayers are simply monsters. This is because we intuitively understand that there is something distinct and notable about intragroup betrayal.

    So you may disagree with Nader’s politics, but to take to the fainting couch because he used a term that precisely describes his take on Obama’s perfidy, one which furthermore acknowledges the Obamanoids insistence that our understanding of their candidate must necessarily be informed by the category of race-well, that’s just the prissiest sort of PC nonsense.