Mon, Dec 01, 2008

User login


Jewcy Book Club

This week:
and My Jesus YearDumbfounded
Welcome Authors
Benyamin Cohen
&
Matthew Rothschild
who are posting all week.
Coming up:
  • 12/08:
    Seth Greenland

FAITHHACKER

WWMD (What Would Maimonides Do) About the GMO Kashrut Question?

Helen Jupiter
TAGS:

GMOs: totally not kosherGMOs: totally not kosherI've been grappling with the problem of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) for a long time now, and as my awareness of them has increased, their presence in my diet has decreased. This is partly due to health concerns, partly due to environmental factors, and partly a matter of social responsibility. The fact is, I don't trust companies like Monsanto with my body, with the land that my food is grown on, nor to have respect for (the few remaining) farmers who are still acting as stewards of the earth. No authoritative consensus has been reached on whether or not GMO foods are kosher, and I've been looking to the Torah for insight into the debate. What I've found thus far, is that so many of the practices inherent in agribusiness contradict the laws of the Torah and the Talmud, it's almost impossible to conceive of GMOs being kosher.

Starting from the beginning, here's a passage from Genesis, 1.29:

God said, "See, I give you every seed-bearing plant that is upon all the earth, and every tree that has seed-bearing fruit; they shall be yours for food."

GMO crops have historically been developed not to bear viable seed. In other words, each batch of GMO seeds will yield only one crop, and the seeds from that crop, the "second generation seeds" lose their vigor, forcing farmers to buy new seed each year. Companies like Monsanto have been developing Terminator seed technology.

Terminator refers to plants that are genetically engineered to render sterile seeds at harvest – a technology that aims to maximize seed industry profits by preventing farmers from re-planting harvested seed.

If that doesn't fly in the face of Torah, I don't know what does. Next, there's the problem of cross-pollination. Both the Torah and the Talmud comment on concern for one's neighbor. First, there's the good old quote from Leviticus 19.18:

Love your fellow as yourself

The Mishna takes it further, offering commentary on damages to neighbors.

Surprisingly, we are cautioned against causing the loss of benefit to another, even if he has no legal claim to it. The principle "that one should not drain the water of his well when others need it" is found in the Talmud. A Jew is even commanded to prevent damage threatening his neighbor from an outside force.

The Talmudic sages expanded these laws to also prohibit psychological disturbances, such as possible exposure to a neighbor's observation, noise, and so on. Anyone suffering from such annoyances may appeal to the courts to force his neighbor to remove them. This may include the removal of the cause of the noise, even if the noise is only indirectly due to it and even if its removal will cause the owner financial hardship. Based on these rules, the following guiding principle was drafted: "One may not save his own property from damage at the expense of his fellow's damage." This principle could serve as a foundation in modern legislation for pollution control.

Cross-pollination of GM seeds has come to be called "genetic" or "biotech" pollution. It can be caused, for example, when wind transports a GMO seed into a non-GMO field. The horror stories of farmers finding that their crops have been cross-pollinated with GMOs are rampant. Not only do organic crops lose their premium value, but to add insult to injury, many of these farmers often wind up getting sued by the very biotech companies whose seed polluted their fields in the first place. Take Percy Schmeiser, who was sued by Monsanto when his fields were contaminated by their GMO "Roundup Ready canola." Then there was the whole Starlink debacle, in which a biotech corn not approved for human consumption made its way onto grocery store shelves.

These two issues alone--GMO crops that don't bear viable seeds, and damages to neighbors (near and far)--seem like reasons good enough to label GMOs as Not Kosher, but they're just the beginning. I'll follow this post up soon with more examples of why I don't think there's anything kosher about GMOs.



Helen Jupiter

Helen Jupiter is a writer based in Los Angeles. In the past she has contributed to Gridskipper


More...
Alex Chaihorsky

Alex Chaihorsky


Your argument is valid but it does not warrant the strength of your conclusion, i.e. that " it's almost impossible to conceive of GMOs being kosher". You are definitely biased politically and this is not how good kashrut argument is being made.

Genetic manipulants, for instance some hybrids (say tangelos) also do not belong to the list of God-given flora, but they are not considered non-kosher. Bananas and seedless watermelons are selectively bred to be triploid so that they do not produce seeds and the question of them being non-kosher because of that never arisen. Almost all wheat today is hybrid.

To support your conclusion I would say (just as an exercise, I actually disagree with your conclusions) I would say that probably few would object that ANY genetic construct where treif animals genes are incorporated must be considered non-kosher. Then in Talmudic tradition, by extention, to eliminate even a possibility of such, - ALL genetic constructs which were made using the procedures and methods that are in theory capable of manipulating animal genes into a plant, should be considered non-kosher. That would make GMO flora non-kosher.

Not that I agree, but I think this would be a better argument.





craig


The health safety of GMO’s is a serious issue, especially since multinational biotechs are flooding the world with transgenic seeds.

The modern laboratory techniques used to create transgenic seeds (recombinant DNA, bioballistics, microinjection, etc.) are not anywhere close to ‘traditional plant breeding’ – they are exceptionally potent, invasive technologies that violently penetrate the natural DNA barrier, and they allow not only cross-species transgenics, but even cross-kingdom transgenics.

From A July 1, 2007 article in the New York Times ('A Challenge to Gene Theory, a Tougher Look at Biotech' - Denise Caruso): “Evidence of a networked genome shatters the scientific basis for virtually every official risk assessment of today’s commercial biotech products, from genetically engineered crops to pharmaceuticals.”

As science evolves, so do its conclusions. A little knowledge is hugely dangerous - even more so when it concerns the world food supply.





Alex Chaihorsky

Alex Chaihorsky


Well, let us separate food safety issue and kosher issue, because they have nothing to do with each other. Kosher is not kosher because it is healthy or better food. Kosher is a purely religious concept with divine reasons behind it that were never revealed to us and has nothing to do with any nutritional, food safety or any other human logic.

That said, I also want to say that genetically altered food and genetics in general will be a very fertile field for media to make people buy papers, as it can be made as scary a subject as one's imagination allow. Knowing how limited and naive the imagination of our science and mathematics deprived journalists is, I am thinking to fill the void one day.

Tam, ta ta-aam! "An angry ex-husband injects lady with genetic engineering drug that will make her future children half-pigs"!

In my honest opinion, however dull the subjects of pollution, chemical additives and especially hormones in food are, they are far more dangerous than the genetically altered corn, rice or wheat. But these boring and OLD hazards of course are not as sexy as "England allowed human-cow hybrids!" Tam - taa - taaam!!!!!!!!!!!!!