| Orthodoxy | |
|
by Benjamin Kerstein, August 27, 2007
|
|
The New Republic has an interesting profile of an evangelical priest who converted to Orthodox Christianity because of his disatisfaction with the frivolousness of evangelical ritual. I couldn't help but notice a certain synchronicity at work.
When Wilbur Ellsworth ministered at First Baptist, a typical Sunday service--held inside the church's immense but unadorned white-walled, burgundy-carpeted sanctuary--went something like this: Wearing a suit and tie, Ellsworth would stand at a pulpit and preach. Aside from occasionally rising in prayer and joining the church choir and orchestra in some traditional Protestant hymns, the congregants would largely refrain from any activity during the one-hour-and-15-minute service--except for once a month, when they would receive communion.
The service Ellsworth now leads at Holy Transfiguration, by contrast, has an entirely different feel. Wearing his priestly vestments and standing inside the church's small sanctuary--which boasts yellow walls covered with hundreds of tiny iconic pictures of saints and Oriental rugs on the floor--Ellsworth conducts much of the service from behind the iconostasis (or icon wall) where he is out of view of the congregation. The congregants stand for most of the two-hour service, constantly prostrating and crossing themselves, and the only music is rhythmic Byzantine chanting. At the end of the service, they file up to the front of the sanctuary--as they do every Sunday--and take communion. It's easy to see how, for someone reared in an evangelical church, the Orthodox Church might seem like something not just from another culture, but another world.
And yet it is precisely that otherworldliness that is part of what is attracting a growing number of evangelicals to the Orthodox Church.
I myself must confess to a certain affinity for these sentiments. I grew up in an ultra-progressive Reform temple whose services bored me to tears and, as I later discovered, bore a suspicious resemblance to those of mainstream Protestant churches. I distinctly remember being fascinated by watching the mass performed at Notre Dame cathedral in Paris and harboring a guilty sense of envy for the mystic ritual and pageantry that was wholly lacking in the Judaism I knew.
It was not until I came to Israel and witnessed unadulterated traditional Judaism in action that I realized that this also existed in Judaism, if not more so, but had been diluted or abandoned over the course of three centuries of reform and reconfiguration. As a writer, I was particularly struck by the sense that, in these small, utterly unadorned neighborhood synagogues, the pronouncement of words alone was sufficient to conjure up the other world. The Judaism I had previously known was prosaic, lacerated, to large to be human and too reduced to invoke what Levinas called the trace of God.
In the interests of full disclosure, I must confess that I remain firmly secular and can make no claim to piety or purity myself. I am more than prepared to entertain the notion that the intertwining of religion and state in Israel has gone so far that it is now to the detriment of both. Nonetheless, no amount of aesthetic grandeur, guitar toting cantors, pipe organs and choral singers will ever convince me that the "otherworldliness" afforded by the ancient invocations can be replaced by the new, the modern and the desperately different.
![]() |
Bostonian by birth, Israeli by choice, soon to be graduate of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, writer, blogger, aspiring novelist, student of Jewish and Israeli history and Assistant Editor of Azure. More... |
François Blumen...
I like your description of
I like your description of the effect of a beautiful service onto people -something like art for the masses? (In the interests of full disclosure, I must confess that I am bored to tears by pretty much any kind of religious service.)
zbird
"unadulterated traditional Judaism in action"
I'm curious where you saw "unadulterated traditional Judaism in action"? Is that a reference to Orthodox Judaism in general, or to a particular synagogue or movement in Israel?
--Z
Gregory C.
I agree.
There is something deeply compelling about ancient liturgical tradition that modern aesthetics simply cannot match. As a secularist, I still must concede that the sense of transcendence created by religious art and music has yet to be evoked by its more "rational" and so-called "acessible" heirs.
mhpine
Unadulterated traditional Judaism
What exactly constitutes "unadulterated traditional Judaism"? Does it entail the wearing of 18th century Polish clothes and melodies borrowed from Eastern European folk tunes? When does the tradition become inexorably adulterated? By switching to melodies composed in the past generation - or do Carlebach tunes get a pass for their clever use of "traditional" musical tropes? When is the "mystery" lost? When a woman's voice is heard in prayer or seen in the absence of a mechitza? When aliyot are no longer handed out to Cohanim? When the d'var Torah is given in the language of the congregants?
There is a vast range between a shtiebl in Mea Sharim and Temple Beth Suburb in Scarsdale. Untethered from any genuine halakhic or religious mandate, a preference for 21st century Orthodox aesthetics is simply that - an aesthetic preference. You may not get anything out of the organ-chorale bombast of classical Reform, or the folk-rock swaying of camp Reform, or the hand-motion, responsive reading and cantorial acrobatics of standard Conservative, or the six-part a capella harmonies of a traditional egalitarian service, but why sneer at those who do? Jewish prayer certainly hasn't remained in a pristine, unchanged shape in the past 2000 years. This year at Rosh Hashanah, why not fire up the incense and go really old-school. After all, what can be more "authentic" or "mysterious" than animal sacrifice?
Benjamin
tradition Judaism
Strikes me as that which has evolved out of halachic tradition and not out of a conscious break from it, i.e. Reform or Conservative Judaism.