More Trouble from the Feiglinists |
|
by Benjamin Kerstein, August 14, 2007 |
|
Israel's most industrious theocrat, Moshe Feiglin, continues his quest for influence and power in the Likud Party and, according to Haaretz, he's succeeding.
Why not place a ballot box at Ben-Gurion Airport by the duty-free shops? Or by the entrance to a vacation club in Turkey? Not that it matters - Moshe Feiglin has already won.
There's no doubt that Bibi will retain the leadership of the party, but Feiglin and his followers would seem to be equally assured of getting what they want.
A low voter turnout today will boost Feiglin's strength far beyond his real support. If Feiglin gets 20 percent of the votes, the result could be portrayed as an embarrassing malfunction. If he gets 30 percent of the votes, it would brand the Likud as negative, reactionary, and delusional, which would play into the hands of its political rivals.
But this is not Netanyahu's main problem. What really worries him is that the Likud's Knesset members regard the "Feiglins" as a significant, organized faction that must be taken into account. In this case, the bunch of rebels - most of whom ended up outside the present Knesset - will raise its head. Likud Knesset candidates will begin to compete with each other for the most radical statements to curry favor with the Feiglin group as the Knesset election approaches. Incumbent MKs will propose right-wing legislation for the same reason.
Ironically, Netanyahu's missteps may have less to do with this development than Ariel Sharon's split with the Likud Party. Sharon took most of Likud's centrist membership with him when he left, leaving the Likud more radical, more angry and more vulnerable to a takeover from the party's extreme wing.
Feiglin, of course, hasn't got a chance of ever being elected party chairman, but he may be well on his way to transforming Kahanism from a fringe movement into a serious mainstream political player. In the short term, this may be good news for the Israeli left, but in the long term its a serious problem for Israeli democracy. If there is one thing we don't need, its another theocrat with his hands on the levers of power.
![]() |
Bostonian by birth, Israeli by choice, soon to be graduate of Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, writer, blogger, aspiring novelist, student of Jewish and Israeli history and Assistant Editor of Azure. More... |
Anonymous
We tried secular zionism. That worked from 1948 to 1993, when we decided that having good press took precedence over Jewish life. We tried to become more European, and we got more anti-Semitism than we have seen since the Holocaust. We tried to subcontract our defence to the PA, and got our arms turned against us. We put our faith in the UN instead of G-d, as we still have 3 soldiers missing and Italian and Spanish troops defending Hezbollah in S Lebanon. We tried unilateral withdrawal and got missiles raining on Haifa and Sderot. We are asked to choose between a secular state from the river to the sea (PA) vs Islamic caliphate (Hamas). Olmert pursues gay tourism while Iran pursues nuclear weapons. In short we have tried everything except be a Jewish state. Time to give Feiglin a try.
Cinnamon Stilwell
"Leonidas' mission in Snyder's 300 is an act of suicidal violence -- a suicidal violence that if performed by white people in remote corners of history is heroic but if by Palestinians or Iraqis then it becomes sign [sic] of barbarism....What Snyder actually portrays (for the whole world to see) is the best picture of the US army in action. That monstrosity that Snyder pictures marching towards Thermopylae is the American empire -- and that band of brothers that stood up to that monstrosity are those resisting this empire: they are the Iraqi resistance, the Palestinians, Hizbullah."
Hamid Dabashi, Hagop Kevorkian Professor of Iranian Studies and Comparative Literature of Columbia University, reviewing the film "300" in Al-Ahram Weekly Online, August 2-8, 2007
Anonymous
Hamid is an Islamofacist who defends the killers of Jewish children. It's nonsense to make terrorism into a racial issue. Iranians consider themselves White and so do most Arabs. Cinnamon; why don't you go to the Hamas website and post your anti-semitic blood-thirsty crap there.
Anonymous
She just was showing readers what outrageous things Islamofascists say!