Oh, please, Gerson's piece in the Post is ridiculous: does he really think he's being innovative in asking the question of morality without a god? It's the question every single believer asks of Hitch or Dawkins at any given moment (just check you tube); and both have provided their answers (as well as Sam Harris, and also many other, less glamorous and/or forgotten atheists, it's not like there's only one atheist position on morality) in their books -which begs the question: did the 'opponents' actually read those books?
François Blumen...
Oh, please, Gerson's piece in the Post is ridiculous: does he really think he's being innovative in asking the question of morality without a god? It's the question every single believer asks of Hitch or Dawkins at any given moment (just check you tube); and both have provided their answers (as well as Sam Harris, and also many other, less glamorous and/or forgotten atheists, it's not like there's only one atheist position on morality) in their books -which begs the question: did the 'opponents' actually read those books?