Who's in Bed with the OU? |
|
by Laurel Snyder, May 15, 2007 |
|
Abstinence: For all the wrong reasonsYesterday, Jewschool's Mobius drafted an Open Letter to the OU on their New Pro-Abstinence Campaign:
If you don’t want Jewish kids to shtup before they’re married, don’t lie and tell them that the reason they shouldn’t is because condoms are ineffective. You’re spreading dangerously false information that can actually increase the likelihood of Jewish kids contracting sexually transmitted diseases, which can pose a serious risk to their lives.
If they’re going to have sex — and trust me, they’re going to, whether you like it or not (whereas abstinence education is a proven failure) — you should encourage them to do it safely, otherwise you won’t only be dealing with a problem of promiscuity, but with an even bigger STD problem in the Jewish community than that which already exists.
Furthermore, if you’re serious about fighting intermarriage and promoting Jew-on-Jew coupling, you’re going to have a really hard time doing so when you’re scaring Jewish kids off from being intimate with one another. The Jewish establishment is spending millions annually to encourage Jewish kids to sleep with each other. Michael Steinhardt alone has spent a fortune trying to encourage Jewish kids to jump in the sack.
And he makes some good points... focusing on the insanity of arguing against the use of condoms...
But in a more general sense, I'm just amazed by the stupidity of this "campaign". Not only are they spreading misinformation about condoms, scaring hell out of kids... but they're also leaning on lame arguments like, "Joseph resisted Mrs. Potiphar, so you can resist the attractions of cooch too".
Genius! When I was sixteen, and an insecure bundle of hormones, that would TOTALLY have worked.
I think what bothers me most about this issue is how much it smacks of the evangelical Christian model. Using bible stories and scare tactics to keep people from having sex, rather than explaining in honest, intelligent, Jewish ways... why it might be better to wait awhile?
Do we want our kids to start wearing teen purity rings too?
This site also responds to the new freako-teen-website, and does a good job, offering some particularly inane quotes from the OU:
"Sexually active girls are three times more likely to attempt suicede"
"Over 25% of sexually active teenage girls report they are depressed..."
Yeah, okay. Okay. The more I learn about the OU, the more okay I am with my secular Jewish upbringing...
![]() |
I scribble a lot. I talk too much. I apologize with wild abandon. More... |
Anonymous
I agree with most of your comments, but remember the OU's target audience--orthodox Jews or Jews who they hope will become orthdodox Jews. For that group, the argument based on Joseph is not lame, it is consistent with their world view. The orthodox world frequent cites to biblical examples as carrying great weight.
I am surprised at the scare tactics and misinformation side of the campaign. In my experience, the OU usually does a good job of blenicng orthodox tradition and modern science.
Laurel Snyder
I hear what you're saying, but this is an issue of HOW the biblical reference is being made. It *is* a part of orthodoxy to draw on our texts. But it is cheesey and a little insulting to say, "Be like Joe!"
Joe?
This is like when a tacky old grandma tries to talk kid-kid-lingo to "relate". Kids are not fooled by this kind of shtick. I don't care how frum they are.
xoL http://jewishyirishy.com
Anonymous
Oh, I missed the heading to the NCSY post. I would have expected Be Like Yoseph HaTzadek.
Yes, I agree that the slogan "Be like Joe" is lame or even a little troubling (I don't really want to think about whether that other Joe (Lieberman that is) engaged in pre marital sex--it's bad enough when they ask Mitt Rommney that question).
Laurel Snyder
is a big part of how this bothers me. This new trend in "updating" religious lingo.
Electric guitar kaddish. Etc.
xoL http://jewishyirishy.com