![]() |
From Sacred Space to Home Sweet Home |
|
| Would you move in to a former shul, church, or mosque? | ||
by Tamar Fox, July 16, 2008 |
||
Tajikistan’s last synagogue was razed to the ground recently, to make way for the new presidential palace, despite outcry from the community. Reading this got me thinking about sacred spaces that have been converted into not-so-sacred spaces. In some cases, like Tajikistan, is seems horrible and insensitive. But in other places, it’s not quite so bad.
New York Magazine recently covered an old synagogue converted into an artist’s loft. Something about it seems reasonably respectful. And then there’s a design firm in Utrecht, Zecc, that transformed an old chapel into a spacious and fairly trendy home.
I know people who have lived in synagogue apartments, or houses owned by their churches, and that doesn’t seem particularly strange to me, but living a regular life in a space that was previously used for worship? Can you imagine having sex two feet from where a bima used to be? Or taking a bath on what used to be an altar?
Roi Ben-Yehuda
Hey Tamar. I thought you would interested to know that the Mishnah says that a synagogue has a loci of limited sanctity which is determined by proximity to the torah. Without the Torah it loses its limited sanctity. And that once it is sold, it may pretty much be used for anything (one opinion even says a bathroom).
Not that this changes anything, but I thought you should know.
Simon
This is a church whose facade has been left up - but when you go through the doors it's just a regular college building: http://www.imtl.org/montreal/building/eglise-Saint-Jacques.php
Montreal is full of buildings like this.
Shootingsparks
What makes what happened in Tajikastan "horrible and insensitive" while the other examples cited are perfectly acceptable?
I call it "cognitive dissonance"....
Efendisiz
http://www.alsohbet.com
http://www.kelebek.us
www.hikayelerim.org