Mon, Oct 13, 2008

User login

Jewcy Book Club

Welcome Authors
Brian Frazer
&
Mike Edison
who are posting all week.
Coming up:
  • 10/13:
    Rabbi Levi Brackman and Sam Jaffe
  • 10/20:
    Jonathan Garfinkel
  • 10/20:
    Rabbi Robert Levine
  • 10/27:
    Danit Brown
  • 10/27:
    Joshua Henkin
  • 11/03:
    Craig Glazer
  • 11/10:
    Max Gross
  • 11/17:
    Seth Greenland

Iran's Elections: Hindenburg Beats Hitler

 
Advertisement

Ali Larijani (Right) With Javier Solana: It's almost as if diplomacy with Iran is worth a shotAli Larijani (Right) With Javier Solana: It's almost as if diplomacy with Iran is worth a shot One can be forgiven for not noticing, in light of the earth-shattering revelations in Scott McClellan's book, that the Iranian Parliament, the Majlis, elected a new speaker this week, Ali Larijani, by a resounding 232 to 31 margin. Before joining the Majlis in March, Larijani had been one of two personal appointees of Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei to the Supreme National Security Council, in which capacity he was Iran's chief international representative on nuclear technology policy. Before that, he was a candidate in the presidential election of 2005, and has been one of the chief rivals to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for the favor of Khamenei, for control of the conservative political coalition, and for power in Iran.

Now, there's no reason to lionize Larijani pre-emptively. His history suggests that he is far less reformist than say, Muhammad Khatami, whose presidency was a pretty big disappointment. But he is the leader of the pragmatist wing of the conservative coalition and not a raving loon like Ahmadinejad, so his elevation to the speakership of the Majlis is a fairly profound signal that Khamenei is displeased with Iran's strategic drift. Which means conditions exist for a reorientation of Iranian policy (especially if Larijani defeats Ahmadinejad in the upcoming elections in 2009).

What does all this mean for Americans? Firstly, that the next president will likely have an opportunity for diplomacy with Iran that hasn't existed since 2003, and if he (or she) squanders that opportunity without so much as trying to put a halt to Iranian nuclearization through negotiations, we'll all be that much less safe as a result. So it's probably worthwhile thinking about which presidential candidates have made a steadfast promise to make you less safe when and if you vote this November.

Secondly and relatedly, it's probably time for those people supporting the propagandistic charade that "talking to Iran" = "talking to Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Holocaust denier" to feel a little agenbite of shame. Ahmadinejad's job was a combination of secretarial and ambassadorial duties, in which he could only exercise power at the discretion of Khamenei. Since Khamenei regards Ahmadinejad as a low-class dolt, Ahmadinejad has not exercised power on any matter of significance, let alone conducting Iranian foreign policy.

Thirdly and most importantly, willful mistranslations of a powerless figurehead aside, Khamenei and the Majlis' gelding of Ahmadinejad and elevation of Larijani is yet more evidence that the Iranian government acts rationally to satisfy its preferences, the most important of which is self-preservation. Which is a good thing to keep in mind when liars and hallucinators claim that Iran is a greater threat to US security than the Soviet Union was, because of some unique death-seeking quality of Iran's governing ideology. Also worth keeping in mind is that the fantasist school of Iran policy used to be the gang that denounced Reagan as a Chamberlainian surrender-monkey for talking to Mikhail "Hitler" Gorbachev.



 

Anonymous


Ahmadinejad is a dolt? Lets

Ahmadinejad is a dolt? Lets see, he has prevented any real threats to the development of nuclear reactors, and wowed the audience at Columbia (while Jewcy was protesting the far more dangerous Abe Foxman), and has made Holocaust denial respectable. He has solidified a Shiite arc of power that now includes Lebanon.

     In the 1980s Carter advised Arafat on the good cop, bad cop routine that was used to scare whites. Negotiate with MLK, or deal with Hosea Williams. Arafat used this successfully using Hamas as a threat. We now know that there is not much difference between the PA and Hamas. The Iranians are now using this trick, and you havent caught on. I guess you overslept your classes at Yale





Anonymous


IMportant

Thank you for this information





Rick Ross


This is Funny

So when Ahmadinejad makes his lunatc rants about wiping Israel off the map (I expect a fake juan cole quote in respons) the presidency doesn't matter, but when he might lose or when Khatami was in power it shows the reform minded tendancies of the Iranian regime? You can't have it both ways





Joshua Teitelbaum


  • Over the past

 

Over the past several years, Iranian leaders – most prominently, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

– have made numerous statements calling for the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people. While

certain experts have interpreted these statements to be simple expressions of dissatisfaction with the

current Israeli government and its policies, in reality, the intent behind Ahmadinejad’s language and that

of others is clear.

What emerges from a comprehensive analysis of what Ahmadinejad actually said – and how it has been

interpreted in Iran – is that the Iranian president was not just calling for “regime change” in Jerusalem,

but rather the actual physical destruction of the State of Israel. When Ahmadinejad punctuates his

speech with “Death to Israel” (marg bar Esraiil), this is no longer open to various interpretations.

A common motif of genocide incitement is the dehumanization of the target population. The Nazi weekly Der

Stürmer portrayed Jews as parasites and locusts. Ahmadinejad said in a speech on February 20, 2008: “In the

Middle East, they [the global powers] have created a black and filthy microbe called the Zionist regime.”

Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who succeeded Ayatollah Khomeini in 1989, has made

statements about Israel similar to Ahmadinejad. On December 15, 2000, he declared on Iranian TV:

“Iran’s position, which was first expressed by the Imam [Khomeini] and stated several times by those

responsible, is that the cancerous tumor called Israel must be uprooted from the region.”

Michael Axworthy, who served as the Head of the Iran Section of Britain’s Foreign and Commonwealth

Office, notes that when the slogan “Israel must be wiped off the map” appeared “draped over missiles in

military parades, that meaning was pretty clear.”

There is an ample legal basis for the prosecution of Ahmadinejad in the International Court of Justice

and the International Criminal Court for direct and public incitement to commit genocide and crimes

against humanity.

6 What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel

Over the past several years, Iranian leaders – most prominently, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad

– have made numerous statements calling for the destruction of Israel and the Jewish people. Some of these

statements have been interpreted by certain journalists and experts on Iran to be simple expressions of

dissatisfaction with the Israeli presence in the West Bank or eastern Jerusalem, or with the current Israeli

government and its policies.

Juan Cole of the University of Michigan argues that Ahmadinejad was not calling for the destruction of

Israel, saying, “Ahmadinejad did not say he was going to wipe Israel off the map because no such idiom

exists in Persian.” The British Guardian’s Jonathan Steele argued that Ahmadinejad was simply remarking

that “this regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.” Steele continues: “He was not

making a military threat. He was calling for an end to the occupation of Jerusalem at some point in the

future. The ‘page of time’ phrase suggests he did not expect it to happen soon.”1

Scholars continue to soft-pedal the Iranian President’s words. Professor Stephen Walt, who previously

served as academic dean of Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and co-authored TheIsrael Lobby and US Foreign Policy along with Professor John Mearsheimer of the University of Chicago,

told a Jerusalem audience during a joint appearance in early June 2008, “I don’t think he is inciting to

genocide,” when asked about Ahmadinejad’s call to wipe Israel off the map.2

In reality, the intent behind Ahmadinejad’s language is clear. Those who seek to excuse Iranian leaders

should not remain unchallenged when they use the tools of scholarship as a smokescreen to obfuscate these

extreme and deliberate calls for the destruction of Israel. Language entails meaning. These statements have

been interpreted by leading Iranian blogs and news outlets – some official – to mean the destruction of

Israel.

U.S. Congress Debate on Translating Ahmadinejad

Translating Ahmadinejad’s statements is not purely an academic matter. When in 2007 the U.S. House

of Representatives debated a resolution calling on the UN Security Council to charge Ahmadinejad with

violating the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide and the United

Nations Charter because of his repeated calls for the destruction of Israel (H. Con. Res. 21), the issue of the

accuracy of the translation of his remarks came up in the House debate.

Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) requested that alternative translations of Ahmadinejad’s language – like

that of South African political scientist Virginia Tilley – be introduced into the Congressional Record.

These versions assert the Iranian president was only seeking a change of regime in Israel and not the

physical elimination of the country.3 H. Con. Res. 21 was adopted by a majority of 411 to 2, with Rep.

Kucinich and Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) voting against.

Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 7

Examining Ahmadinejad’s Language

What emerges from a comprehensive analysis of what Ahmadinejad actually said – and how it has been

interpreted in Iran – is that the Iranian president was not just calling for “regime change” in Jerusalem, but

rather the actual physical destruction of the State of Israel. After all, it is hard to wipe a country off the map

without destroying its population as well.

The Iranian government itself reinforced this understanding with its own rendition of his slogans on posters

and billboards during official parades. Those who try to make Ahmadinejad’s statements excusable by

narrowing their meaning to a change of Israel’s ruling coalition are misleading their readers. The plain

meaning of what Ahmadinejad has declared constitutes a call for genocide – the destruction of the Jewish

state and its residents.

A contextual examination of these statements demonstrates beyond a doubt that when Iranian leaders use the

euphemism “Zionist regime” or “the Jerusalem-occupying regime,” they are most definitely referring to the State

of Israel and not to the present regime. Iranian leaders are simply following the time-worn practice in the Arab

world of referring to the “Zionist regime” in an attempt to avoid dignifying Israel by recognizing its name.

Iranian leaders are also not talking about a non-directed, natural historical process that will end with Israel’s

demise. Rather, they are actively advocating Israel’s destruction and have made it clear that they have the

will and the means to effect it.

Ahmadinejad’s “Wipe Israel Off the Map” Speech

In an address to the “World without Zionism” Conference held in Tehran on October 26, 2005, Iranian

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said:4

ORIGINAL TRANSLITERATION TRANSLATION

و امام عزيز ما فرمودند كه اين

رژيم اشغالگر قدس بايد از صفحه

روزگار محو شود. اين جمله

بسيار حكيمانه است.

Va Imam-e aziz-e ma

farmudand ke in rezhim-e

eshghalgar-e Qods bayad

az safhe-ye ruzegar mahv

shaved. In jomle besyar

hakimane ast.

Our dear Imam [Khomeini]

ordered that this Jerusalemoccupying

regime [Israel]

must be erased from the

page of time. This was a very

wise statement.

The New York Times translated the statement as Israel “must be wiped off the map,” a non-literal translation

which nevertheless conveyed the meaning of the original – the destruction of Israel.5 Despite the international

controversy that Ahmadinejad’s language generated, a report on his October 2005 speech was still available

on his presidential website as of May 2008.

8 What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel

“Jerusalem-Occupying Regime” – Another Name for the

State of Israel

Soft-pedaling Ahmadinejad’s call for the destruction of Israel, Prof. Cole told the New York Times that

all Ahmadinejad had said was that “he hoped its regime, i.e., a Jewish-Zionist state occupying Jerusalem,

would collapse.”6

Official Iranian spokespersons and organs have since based their slogans on Ahmadinejad’s statement,

and have loosely translated the statement as “Israel should be wiped off the face of the world.” This is

evident in pictures showing banners and signs in parades and ceremonies. Even the Iranian newscaster that

introduced the report on the “World without Zionism” Conference used the word “Israel” (instead of the

“Jerusalem-occupying regime”) and also the word “world” (instead of the “page of time”), and thus referred

to Ahmadinejad’s statement as “erasing Israel, this disgraceful stain, from the world” (clip available from

the Jerusalem Center upon request).

While Iranian leaders are well aware that they are watched by the international media and occasionally soften the

wording of their statements accordingly, they are less careful in internal forums and events. When Ahmadinejad

punctuates his speech before a large crowd with “Death to Israel” (marg bar Esraiil), this is no longer open to

various interpretations.7 He is openly calling for the destruction of a country – and not a regime.

Dehumanization as Prelude to Genocide: Israel as an Infection

In the same speech of October 26, 2005,8 Ahmadinejad returned to the theme of Israel as dirty vermin

which needed to be eradicated:

ORIGINAL TRANSLITERATION TRANSLATION

به زودي اين لكه ننگ را از دامان

دنياي اسلام پاك خواهد كرد و

اين شدني است.

Be-zudi in lake-ye nang ra az

damane donya-ye Islam pak

khahad kard, va in shodani’st.

Soon this stain of

disgrace will be cleaned

from the garment of

the world of Islam, and

this is attainable.

In order to remove any doubt in the mind of the Persian reader that Ahmadinejad is referring to Israel, the

Iranian president’s official site, www.president.ir, interpolates the word “Esraiil” ( اسرائيل ) in its report on the

speech to explain the expression “stain of disgrace.”9

Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 9

A common motif of genocide incitement is the dehumanization of the target population. The Nazi weekly

Der Stürmer portrayed Jews as parasites and locusts. In the early 1990s, Hutu propaganda in Rwanda against

the Tutsis described them as “cockroaches.”10 Prior to Saddam Hussein’s operations against the Iraqi Shiitepopulation in 1991, his Baath Party newspaper characterized them as “monkey-faced people.”

11 Similarly,

President Ahmadinejad has called Israeli Jews “cattle,” “blood thirsty barbarians,” and “criminals.”12

Dehumanization has also appeared in other forms, like demonization, by which the target population is

described as “Satanic” – a theme specifically used by Ahmadinejad.13

The theme of the Israeli germ or microbe is also a common one with the Iranian president. In his speech

before a crowd in Bandar Abbas on February 20, 2008, Ahmadinejad said:14

ORIGINAL TRANSLITERATION TRANSLATION

در منطقه خاورميانه نيز جرثومه

سياه و كثيفي به نام رژيم

صهيونيستي درست كرده اند تا

به جان مردم منطقه بيندازند و به

بهانه آن سياست هاي خود را در

خاورميانه پيش ببرند.

Dar mantaqe-ye Khavar-e

Miyane niz jarsum-e siyah

va kasifi be-nam-e rezhim-e

sahyonisti dorost kardeand

ta be-jan-e mardom-e

mantaqe biandazand va

be-behane-ye an siyasathaye

khod-ra dar Khavar-e

Miyane pish bebarand.

In the Middle East, they [the

global powers] have created

a black and filthy microbe

called the Zionist regime, so

they could use it to attack

the peoples of the region,

and by using this excuse,

they want to advance their

schemes for the Middle East.

On the occasion of the 60th anniversary of Israel’s founding, the President of Iran stated that “global

arrogance established the Zionist regime 60 years ago.” The Islamic Republic News Agency reported:

“President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on Thursday labeled the Zionist regime as a ‘stinking corpse’ and

said those who think they can revive the corpse of this fabricated and usurper regime are mistaken.”15

10 What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel

The Destruction of Israel is Achievable and Imminent –

Not a Long-Term Historical Process

According to President Ahmadinejad, ridding the world of the germ Israel is possible and imminent. On April

14, 2006, Ahmadinejad insisted that Israel was “heading towards annihilation.” He added that Israel was:16

ORIGINAL TRANSLITERATION TRANSLATION

درخت خشكيده و پوسيد هاي است كه

با يك طوفان درهم خواهد شكست

Derakht-e khoshkide va

puside’i ast ke ba yek tufan

dar ham khahad shekast.

A dried, rotten tree that will

collapse with a single storm.

The President of Iran told a press conference on March 14, 2008, held during a meeting of the Organization

of the Islamic Conference in Senegal:17

ORIGINAL TRANSLITERATION TRANSLATION

رژيم صهيونيستي از بين رفتني

است

rezhim-e sahyonisti az bayn

raftani’st.

The Zionist regime is on its

way out [destructible].

Referring to the U.S. (the “Great Satan”) and Israel (the “Little Satan”), Ahmadinejad said at a military

parade on April 17, 2008:18

ORIGINAL TRANSLITERATION TRANSLATION

منطقه و جهان آماده تحولات

بزرگ و پاك شدن از دشمنان

اهريمني است

Mantaqe- va jehan amadeye

tahavolat-e bozorg va

pak shodan az doshmanan-e

ahrimani’st.

The region and the world are

prepared for great changes

and for being cleansed of

Satanic enemies.

For Ahmadinejad, Iran’s support for the Palestinians will help them destroy the State of Israel. He told a press

conference on May 13, 2008: “This terrorist and criminal state is backed by foreign powers, but this regime

would soon be swept away by the Palestinians.”19 A day later, Ahmadinejad spoke in Gorgan, in northern Iran,

declaring, “Israel’s days are numbered,” adding that “the peoples of the region would not miss the narrowest

opportunity to annihilate this false regime.”20 In a public address shown on the Iranian news channel on June

2, 2008, Ahmadinejad again reiterated: “Thanks to God, your wish will soon be realized, and this germ of

corruption will be wiped off the face of the world.”21 Clearly, Ahmadinejad’s call for the imminent destruction

of Israel was not a one-time event in 2005, but rather publicly declared on multiple occasions.

Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 11

Israelis as a “Falsified People”

Ahmadinejad was fully prepared to make his assertions about Jews and Israel in the Western press, as well.

In an interview that appeared in the French daily Le Monde on February 5, 2008, he said the Jews of Israel

are: “a people falsified, invented, [the people of Israel] will not last; they must leave the territory.”

From the interview it is clear he believes that Israelis will not endure and will not continue to stay on the

territory on which they are living. This is not a call for a change of government or new policies alone, but

rather for the removal of Israel’s Jewish population from the country, either by ethnic cleansing or physical

destruction.

How the Statements Are Understood in Iran

Blogs and Forums

While certain Western commentators on Iran seek to whitewash Ahmadinejad’s statements on Israel, proand

anti-regime Iranians (and others in the region) have no doubt that the Iranian president is referring to the

destruction of Israel, according to Iranian blogs and forums. There are close to 180,000 Persian-language

blogs, and Iranians constitute 53 percent of Internet users in the Middle East.

Mr. Ahmadinejad, Isn’t that Enough?

“In every Internet site that I visit today (for example, BBC or Radio-Farda) or the satellite radio and television

news stations that I listen to, the first news item is the pearls of wisdom issued by Mr. Ahmadinejad regarding

the countdown to the destruction of Israel.”22

What Have We Done to Erase Israel?

“Didn’t Imam Khomeini decree that Israel should be erased from the scene of time? Well, I ask you – what

have we done in order to erase this Israel from the scene of time?”23

Ahmadinejad’s Statements and the Qur’an

An Iranian blogger asks: Why did Ahmadinejad talk about the destruction of Israel? Are his statements

supported by religious laws and decrees? The blogger then presents the research he did regarding the

religious writings in the Qur’an that can be seen to support Ahmadinejad’s statements.24

12 What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel

First Fix Your Own Country – Then Destroy Israel

In the Ham-Mihan Forum, the question was raised about Ahmadinejad’s declaration that the countdown

towards Israel’s destruction had begun. Among the 71 responses:

My opinion is that first you [Ahmadinejad] should fix up your own country, and then you can say that

Israel should be destroyed. The people in Iran don’t have bread and we are concerned with Palestine.”

“I wish that all of this energy that is devoted to the destruction of Israel would be directed towards the

destruction of drug addiction, poverty, corruption and prostitution.”25

Take the First Steps towards Obliterating Israel

Bloggers at Imam Sadegh University called for boycotting Israeli products, with the following message:

“Dear bloggers: If you would like to do so, you can take the first steps towards obliterating Israel from the

map of the world.”26

The Iranian blogs reflect a wide range of views regarding statements by Iranian leaders – primarily

Ahmadinejad – on the destruction of Israel. His statement at the “World without Zionism” Conference is

widely quoted in blogs – by those supporting the statement, those critical of the statement, and those who

support the statement but question the wisdom of the timing. One fact cannot be disputed – Ahmadinejad’s

statement that “the Jerusalem-occupying regime must be erased from the page of time” was interpreted by

Persian-language bloggers – without exception – as meaning the physical destruction of the State of Israel.

Resalat Daily Reflects on an Ahmadinejad Speech: “The Great War Is Ahead of Us”

Resalat, a conservative Iranian daily, published an editorial on October 22, 2006, entitled “Preparations for

the Great War,” in which it reflected on a speech given by Ahmadinejad two days earlier. It stated: “It must

not be forgotten that the great war is ahead of us, perhaps tomorrow, or in a few months, or even a few years.

The nation of Muslims must prepare for the great war, so as to completely wipe out the Zionist regime, and

remove this cancerous growth (emphasis added).27

“Israel must be uprooted and wiped off [the pages

of] history” - the inscription on a Shahab 3 missile

in a military parade in Tehran, September 22, 2003

Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 13

Calls for the Destruction of Israel Are Echoed Throughout

Iran at Military Parades, Billboards, and Demonstrations

Even before Ahmadinejad himself spoke about

wiping Israel off the map, the Iranian regime

used such expressions but did not leave any

doubt about what stood behind this phraseology.

By juxtaposing its call for Israel’s elimination

with a Shahab 3 missile during a military parade,

the Iranian regime itself has clarified that these

expressions about Israel’s future do not describe a

long-term historical process, in which the Israeli

state collapses by itself like the former Soviet

Union, but rather the actual physical destruction

of Israel as a result of a military strike. The

Shahab 3 missile has a range of 1,300 kilometers

and can reach Israel from launch points in Iranian

territory. Once Iran has completed the production

of sufficient quantities of highly enriched

uranium – or weapons-grade plutonium – there

is no reason why Iran cannot deploy a future

Iranian nuclear weapon on a Shahab 3 missile in

order to carry out Ahmadinejad’s threat to wipe

Israel off the map.

This banner appears on the building which houses

the Center for the Basij Resistance in the Judicial

Branch, which is part of the Basij Resistance

in Government Ministries and Departments. 28

The Basij are “mobilization forces” used as

reserves for the Islamic Revolutionary Guard

Corps (IRGC) or Pasdaran, which was created

to defend the Iranian revolutionary regime in

1979. The English translation on the banner

reflects how an official organ of the Iranian

government understood Ahmadinejad’s words.

It is noteworthy that variations on the expression

“wipe out of the face of the world” have been

used before in a specifically military context.

In a Friday sermon, former Iranian President

Rafsanjani made the statement: “If one day, a

very important day of course, the Islamic world will also be equipped with the weapons available to Israel

now, the imperialist strategy will reach an impasse, because the employment of even one atomic bomb

inside Israel will wipe it off the face of the earth, but would only do damage to the Islamic world (emphasis

added).”29

14 What Iranian Leaders Really Say about Doing Away with Israel

The banner appears as well on a bus at a military

rally in Iran in November 2006. The banner reads

in English, “Israel should be wiped out of the face

of the world.”30

In English: “Down with Israel”

In Persian: “Death to Israel”

While the captions of the posters in English read

“Down with Esrail [Israel]” and “Down with USA,” the

captions in Arabic read “Death to Israel” and “Death to

America.”

Jerusalem Center for Public Affairs 15

The Statements of Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei

In the Iranian system, the highest ranking political

authority is the Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,

who succeeded Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini in 1989.

Khamenei has made statements about Israel similar to

Ahmadinejad. In a Friday sermon on December 15, 2000

(shown on Iranian TV), he declared: “Iran’s position,

which was first expressed by the Imam [Khomeini] and

stated several times by those responsible, is that the

cancerous tumor called Israel must be uprooted from

the region.”31

A month later on January 15, 2001, at a meeting with

organizers of the International Conference for Support

of the Intifada, he stated: “The foundation of the

Islamic regime is opposition to Israel and the perpetual

subject of Iran is the elimination of Israel from the

region.”32 Iranian journalist Kasra Naji translated this

sentence from the original Farsi as follows: “It is the

mission of the Islamic Republic of Iran to erase Israel

from the map of the region.”33 The difference between

international reaction to Khamenei’s statements on Israel and those of Ahmadinejad in 2005 comes from

the fact that Ahmadinejad’s declarations were made after the disclosure of Iran’s clandestine nuclear

weapons program in 2002-3, and the breakdown of EU-Iranian talks on halting the Iranian uranium

enrichment program. By 2005, Khamenei began a concerted effort to limit the damage done to Iran

by Ahmadinejad’s rhetoric, by insisting that Iran did not seek the military destruction of Israel.34 Yet

Hossein Shariatmadari, a close confidant of Khamenei who serves as one of his major mouthpieces,

wrote an editorial in the Iranian daily Kayhan on October 30, 2005, in which he argued, “We declare

explicitly that we will not be satisfied with anything less than the complete obliteration of the Zionist

regime from the political map of the world.”35 It may be that Khamenei has toned down his own rhetoric,but nonetheless has allowed his handpicked editor-in-chief of Kayhan to maintain his original ideological

position on destroying Israel to the Iranian public.

In a speech on October 4, 2007, Shariatmadari stated: “‘Death to America’ and ‘Death to Israel’ are not

only words written on paper but rather a symbolic approach that reflects the desire of all the Muslim

nations.”36