![]() |
Ron Paul Strikes Back At The GOP, Texas, And Burma |
|
by Daniel Koffler, May 15, 2008 |
||
Dr. Ron Paul earned the nickname "Dr. No" by voting against any and all federal appropriations that came before the House of Representatives, but it seems that Paul is equally adamantly opposed to purely symbolic governmental interventions. Nick Curran of Radar reports that Paul was the only member of the House to vote against a resolution sending condolences to the Burmese victims of Cyclone Nargis. Which is literally the least the US government could possibly do, but too much for Paul.
Ron Paul to Myanmar: "Fuck You"
Don't call Paul an extremist though. He may be opposed to empty gestures of solidarity with southeast Asian natural disaster victims, but he's willing to compromise on empty gestures of solidarity with football players: As Curran notes, in the current legislative session, Paul has voted to congratulate the University of Kansas, Louisiana State, and the New York Giants on their respective seasons.
Even if Paul stands alone in Congress withholding condolences from the Burmese, there are legions of Paulians still fighting to somehow wrest the Republican presidential nomination from John McCain. They've managed to win control of several state conventions, including Minnesota and Nevada, and are expecting to provoke some kind of floor fight at the Republican National Convention in the summer. (Don't ask how they could believe that. Paulians also believe in the gold standard and fear a "North American Union.") And if the Paul movement can manage to a) embarrass John McCain and b) moderate the GOP's recent embrace of war as the health of the state, I can only say long live the rEVOLution.
On the other hand, if all their efforts fizzle, the Paulians have a backup plan: Buying up property in rural Texas where they'll establish "Paulville," a libertarian utopia "gated communities containing 100% Ron Paul supporters." After all, what could be more freeing than quasi-religious total political conformity out in Bumblefuck, Texas, far beyond the reach of the law? Nothing could go wrong with that.
![]() |
Daniel Koffler is a Clarendon Scholar and graduate student in philosophy at the University of Oxford. More... |
David Strauss
I'm not a Ron Paul fan
As much as Ron Paul supports dismantling government authority, the fact is that he's a part of the authority that exists today, and that government authority won't be going away soon.
When he was running for president (is he still?), his supporters vehemently argued that his position on abortion was irrelevant because he'd be giving states the choice. It may be surprising to Ron Paul supporters, but the president and House members don't have a voting option that says "the government doesn't have the authority to do that." They have to make decisions about how to exercise even the authority they believe the government ought not have, at least in the near future.
I do not have confidence Ron Paul exercises that authority well, partly for the reasons expressed in your post.
Daniel Koffler
Right
And I don't mean to mess with Texas by the way --- I have a branch of my family there (okay Austin, so maybe it doesn't count) --- but isolated wide open spaces are a sine qua non for creating Lord of the Flies situations (or worse), and Texas has got 'em.
dmt
Paulville
I'd be pretty interested to see how Paulville would develop, practically speaking. From afar.
David Strauss
Re: Right
I live in Austin, and it indeed doesn't count. From working in politics, I know I can pull up any number of maps that show Austin is politically and culturally distinct from the rest of Texas.
But in the rest of Texas, I guess it's "sucks to you ass-mar."
ChevyNazi
Burma doesn't want our aid
Burma doesn't want our aid apparently. I say just leave them be. America has to get out of the "saving the world" business that its been in since 1917!
Post new comment