![]() |
University College London's Resident 9/11 Truther And Holocaust Denier |
|
| On the sublimely seamless insanity of conspiracy theorists | ||
by Andy Hume, April 21, 2008 |
||
You
can tell a lot about people from the company they keep. Out beyond the
July 7 London Bombings: Obvious inside job fringes
of sane political debate, where Bilderbergers and Illuminati run the Zionist
Occupation Government with the help of mind control and black helicopters, far
right and far left come full circle and eventually meet somewhere round the
dark side of the moon. Generally, it doesn’t do to expose the cranks to the
bright light of public scrutiny; it is, after all, what they secretly crave.
But sometimes it’s necessary; sometimes it must be done.
And so it is with one Nicholas Kollerstrom, 9/11 “truther” and conspiraloon, who manages to combine the earnest belief that the World Trade Center was brought down in a US Government “false flag” operation with a thriving line in writings on astrology and crop circles, and still finds time to hold down a research fellowship at University College London, one of the UK’s top universities. So far, so harmless; British academia has its share of fruitloops. A little more troubling is that Kollerstrom is a self-described Holocaust denier who pops up on websites like that of the “Committee For Open Debate On The Holocaust” with gems such as this plea for “balance” in teaching about the events of 1939-45:
Let us hope the schoolchildren visitors are properly taught about the elegant swimming-pool at Auschwitz, built by the inmates, who would sunbathe there on Saturday and Sunday afternoons while watching the water-polo matches; and shown the paintings from its art class, which still exist; and told about the camp library which had some forty-five thousand volumes for inmates to choose from, plus a range of periodicals; and the six camp orchestras at Auschwitz/Birkenau, its theatrical performances, including a children’s opera, the weekly camp cinema, and even the special brothel established there. Let’s hope they are shown postcards written from Auschwitz, some of which still exist, where the postman would collect the mail twice-weekly.
The investigative blogger “Unity”, at the website Ministry of Truth, has a full rundown on Kollerstrom’s writings and, in particular, his consistent citing of anti-Semitic sources such as Simon Sheppard, who was expelled from Britain’s far-right BNP for being too right-wing (!), or the website “Judicial, Inc.”, which peddles the splendid theory that Hezbollah is an Israeli front to justify continued military activities against Arabs. (“Who is dumb enough to fire some useless rockets...?”). As an alternative to sifting through the dross of the primary sources, it is valuable stuff, and we should be grateful to Unity for getting his hands dirty in a sewer that most of us would not wish to trawl ourselves; it is thankless work.
What I find interesting about characters like Kollerstrom, though, is not so much what they believe, which is common or garden lunacy, at once remarkably nuanced and depressingly one-dimensional; rather, it is the utterly predictable way that these disparate fringe beliefs always seem to join up so seamlessly, despite their ragged edges. 9/11, 7/7, Iraq, Iran, Lebanon, the Holocaust (or rather the “Holocaust”) and much more besides --- all are connected in a tapestry far too densely woven for Occam’s famous razor ever to unpick, and all, needless to say, lead back to one particular group of people. (A hint: their name starts with "J.") There are many scholarly volumes, you imagine, to be written on the particular brand of credulousness that leads people to embrace such outlandish belief systems; indeed, I imagine there are plenty out there already.
It should be noted that, while he is happy to aver his denial of the so-called Holocaust, Kollerstrom denies any involvement with far-right groups; his political affiliations are to the Greens and --- of course! --- George Galloway’s ‘Respect’ Party. Like I said; if you head far enough to the left, you’ll eventually emerge on the far right, as anyone old enough to have played Pac-Man will tell you. One wonders if his outlandish views raised any eyebrows at the political meetings of the so-called “anti-racist” Respect Party he attended. One fears they did not.
Some limited good may come of all this. The forum at the centre of much of the conspiraloon discussion of 9/11 in Britain, nineeleven.co.uk, has now announced a blanket ban on discussion of the Holocaust on its messageboards (much to the vitriolic rage of its regular posters) --- though the day when they realise that they’re all wasting their lives is, you suspect, a long way off. For their part, UCL appear to be entirely blameless in all of this; they have been alerted to the presence of a self-confessed Holocaust denier on their research staff, and action may well be under way to address the situation. But episodes like this remind us that the Truthers are out there. Keep watching the skies...
Michael Green
Kollerstrom certainly keeps
Kollerstrom certainly keeps fitting company with Galloway et al.
Didn't you know that the July 7 bombings in London were caused by the war in Iraq and centuries of colonialism, not by UK-born terrorists? They simply had no choice other than to strap themselves up with explosives and trot down the London for the day. They just couldn't help it, just ask Red Ken and he'll tell you. Either that, or it woz the Blair government wot dunnit.
Ismail
"...Kollerstrom denies any
"...Kollerstrom denies any involvement with far-right groups; his political affiliations are to the Greens and --- of course! --- George Galloway’s ‘Respect’ Party."
Don't they require the legal philosophy majors at Glasgow to spend a moment or two in a logic class? We may infer nothing at all from the observation that a silly twit who raves on about crop circles and kindly Nazis identifies with the Green Party or Respect. I'll bet the Republicans boast a Roswell pest or two among their ranks, and I hear there might be a Democrat who swears by the healing powers of regular colonic purges.
Of course, this post has nothing to do with logic and everything to do with rhetoric of the cheapest sort (see Clinton, Hillary on her opponent's secret jihadism).
"One wonders if his outlandish views raised any eyebrows at the political meetings of the so-called “anti-racist” Respect Party he attended. One fears they did not."
Fabulously scurrilous bit. Now, on the evidence of one malcontent dingbat, we have a picture of Respect cadres solemnly nodding as said dingbat assures them that the Jews are behind global warming and last night's traffic jam.
Back to class with you. Even the witless Joe McCarthy packaged this sort of malicious nonsense more artfully a half century ago.
Davide Simonetti
Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom 22
Dr Nicholas Kollerstrom
22 April 2008UCL has been made aware of views expressed by Dr Nicholas
Kollerstrom, an Honorary Research Fellow in UCL Science &
Technology Studies.
The position of Honorary Research Fellow is a privilege
bestowed by departments within UCL on researchers with whom it wishes
to have an association. It is not an employed position.
The views expressed by Dr Kollerstrom are diametrically
opposed to the aims, objectives and ethos of UCL, such that we wish to
have absolutely no association with them or with their originator.
We therefore have no choice but to terminate Dr Kollerstrom’s Honorary Research Fellowship with immediate effect.
Ismail
Wow! I made the "Oh, snap"
Wow! I made the "Oh, snap" sidebar on the home page!
I'm incredibly humbled by this. It's a great honor to even be considered for this distinction, and to join all the other incredibly talented posters and commenters out there who were judged along with me (but who just didn't have the stuff to win).
I want to thank my beautiful wife and my incredible daughter. Without their unflagging support, this amazing honor would never have been mine.
Thank you all. I love you, each and every one of you. Good night.
Anonymous
Andy Hume, Just because
Andy Hume,
Just because you link 9/11 truth movement with a Holocaust denier, it doesn't mean that there are not legitimate questions that need to be answered about the 9/11 investigation.
Can you explain how is it three different buildings (the twin towers and building 7) despite being damaged in different sections and by different methods, yet they all managed to collapse straight down into their bases, at almost free fall speed?
Why is the video of Palestinians cheering on 9/11 was shown all around the world, yet the story of the Israelis caught cheering on 9/11, while filming themselves with the WTC in the background, was barely reported on?
See
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=575834042418696847&q
Post new comment