![]() |
A Realist Among Dreamers Is Exactly What We Need |
|
| Bitch is the new president | ||
by Wendy Shanker, March 20, 2008 |
||
From: Wendy Shanker
To: Courtney E. Martin; Tedra Osell
I’m fascinated by Courtney and Tedra’s POVs. How delightful it is to debate and think and posit without being right or wrong! For months now we’ve been watching these presidential debates and just tagging them as win/lose, or playing a highlight reel as if it was a football game. “And a Hail Mary from Obama!” Guess Obama is a Giant in more ways than one right now.
A few Saturday nights ago, I stumbled in from a party. I didn’t stumble because I was inebriated, but because I wore high heels that were killing me all night. (That’s another issue for another day: “The pain we are somehow willing to undertake to fluff up our image of femininity…”)
Okay, so I stumble in, I plant myself on the couch, and turn on the TiVo, which has recorded “Saturday Night Live.” Oh, right! I’d watched it on February 23rd, when it somehow managed to stir up a discussion about how Hillary had been mistreated by the media. Then Huckabee showed up to make some gags, Tina Fey was hilarious as usual, and the show went on. While I was watching, I thought: “Why is HUCKABEE on this show? Shouldn’t it be Hillary making the cameo? This is the perfect opportunity to be funny…” Yet again, a disappointing disconnect.
Cut to the show that aired the following Saturday, with Ellen Page hosting (a total
Tina got it right: Time to put a bitch in charge kibosh, but whatever). The show starts with another debate, and the joke again is that the press loves Obama and hates Hillary. The sketch so long and boring that I think it was more fun to wear those high heels. Then a shock – Hillary on screen, looking absolutely radiant, I might add. Whatever her survival secret is, bottle it up and send it my way, because I wore nice shoes for three hours and wanted to give in.
Hillary proceeds to do a long jokeless monologue, and then has an awkward conversation with Amy Poehler who plays her on the show. Giuliani showed up to be self-deprecating, which made the opening sketch seem Pulitzer-worthy. Obama did his due diligence on the show last November. Hillary worked Letterman and she’s parried with Jon Stewart (“You’re right, Jon, this is pathetic.”). This is what politicians do, now. Sketches. Boy, Bill Clinton blows a saxophone on “Arsenio” and the whole campaign system goes nuts.
But there’s Hill on “SNL,” not being funny, and not even making fun of the fact that she’s not funny. That would be funny! And of course, “Saturday Night Live” is so old and dusty that John McCain probably watched it as a kid. Hardly where you go for cutting-edge comedy, but then again, there are very few public venues.
Maybe it was just the endorphins talking, but as I watched the show tick by, I imagined what Hillary might say:
“Hi, everyone, I’m Hillary Clinton. It’s been established that I have no sense of humor, so if you’re looking for laughs you better change the channel.
“I’m not funny. I’m not fresh. I’m not going down in history as a brilliant public speaker. But I will make as history as the first female president of this nation.
“As the great citizen Shania Twain once said, ‘I’m a bitch. I’m a lover, I’m a child, I’m a mother. I’m a sinner, I’m a saint. I do not feel ashamed.’ What I am – and what Obama could never be – is a major, full-time, badass bitch. Congratulations. You’ve found me out. I’ve lost it. Screw all my expensive advisers; we’re officially in Howard Dean territory.
“It is essential to have a bitch in office in 2008. When we’re negotiating with the Iraqis, who do you want in that room: a good guy or an unrelenting, insistent bitch? When the Senate is debating a bill, who do you want signing it – a dreamer or a doer? You may not like me, but you can bet your ass that I’m going to get the job done, even if I have to harangue a mufti to do it.
“I’m not the only one. Condi’s a bitch. Nancy Pelosi? Super bitch. Michelle Obama certainly belongs to the club. Ruth Bader Ginsburg may come off like a lovely lady, but let me tell you, there’s no way a woman can look Clarence Thomas in the eye every day without turning into a hard-core, mega bee-yatch.
“I’m sure that some of you don’t like that word. It’s rude, it’s inappropriate, and its connotations are generally negative. I really don’t give a damn. Because I have nothing left to lose but this election, and frankly, that’s not going to happen.”
As a bitch myself, I endorse that message fully.
The question that people keep asking me is: “If Obama is here, offering hope and idealism, how can you afford to turn it down?” Hillary keeps crushing idealism. She can’t stop. So I understand why Courtney and other peers can’t understand why Obama’s message isn’t motivating to me.
I think he’s offering us a wonderful fantasy. But we’ve been living in a fantasy for the past eight years, about patriotism and the economy and the heckuva-job-Brownie safety for our citizens. I know Obama’s dream is different. But I’m over the fantasy, hope and dreams. What I want in office right now is a realist, and that’s why I still want our First Lady to be our first lady.
Izzy Grinspan
not Shania!
That one's Meredith Brooks. Shania's song was "Man! I feel like a woman."
That, however, is literally the only quibble I've had with this entire dialog, which is otherwise SO good.
Anonymous
If You Say You Get Things Done, Then DO It
Let's just look at how Clinton has run her campaign, and see if she's the bitch you claim she is--because 'bitch' is an accolade we shouldn't award too easily.
1) Thought she'd have it all sewn up by Super Tuesday but ran out of money. Upheaval, drama, and strife in her campaign which results in new campaign management, and attracts the notice of not one but two long articles in the NYT and the Washington Post with lengthy, dirt-spilling quotes from aides and campaign staffers. (Why are we even hearing about this? What kind of loyalty/discipline do you inspire if your own aides are talking smack about each other TO THE PRESS?)
2) Flummoxed by Obama's 12 straight wins; Clinton campaign strategy flails around then finally fixes on "kitchen sink" approach, including dog-whistles to Reagan Democrats with race-baiting tidbits like "a Christian, so far as I know..." "Rev. Wright wouldn't have been my pastor," failure to disassociate self quickly from Ferraro, and matronizing illogical moves like "Obama's too inexperienced...but can be my VP." Oh wait, almost forgot: "McCain and I have experience," but not That Other One.
3) A month of negative campaigning by Clinton and the result? Greater polarization between Obama and Clinton supporters, and all-time low approval ratings for Clinton. Drawn-out nomination process in which she acts like she's McCain's running mate.
4) She had the perfectly legitimate opportunity to pick up Edwards delegates during the Iowa county/state conventions, for example, where delegates are further allocated, but instead 7 of 14 Edwards delegates went to Obama. Clinton lost 1 Iowa delegate. Instead of trying to narrow the 150 pledged delegate margin in states with multi-step delegate conventions (like Iowa), SHE CAN'T EVEN MAINTAIN STATUS QUO in Iowa. Instead, she tries to make up her delegate count by re-visiting the issue of MI/FL delegates and re-votes in those states, thereby increasing division, strife, and ill will in the Democratic Party. Where is her Get Out the Vote apparatus?
5) Meddles with Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) process with a letter from 20 of her wealthiest donors arguing that superdelegates should vote "however they feel" (as in, for Clinton) instead of taking the lead from the will of the people as expressed in support of the candidate with the greatest number of popular votes, pledged delegates, and states won. Suddenly the disenfranchisement of MI and Fl voters in the primaries is her concern when she's behind in the delegate count.
6) Shoots self in the foot with overstating her involvement in Bosnia trip/peace accords, peace talks in Ireland, and SCHIP.
Does she follow pre-agreed upon rules? No. Does she focus on making her own campaign effective, organized, and well-run? No. Does she unite supporters behind her? No--all I see are former Clinton supporters who are disgusted at her post-Super Tuesday campaign strategies. Does she peel off Obama supporters, wooing them with honey instead of vinegar? No. Does she have a strong Get Out the Vote apparatus in each state for what will definitely be a close presidential race in November? No. Does she have long coattails for other Democratic candidates in state assemblies on up to the House to run on? No.
If she were really a competent, brass-ovaried bitch, she'd have all those things and more nailed down. Instead, every failure is either the misogynist media's fault or her opponent's.
Did misogyny prevent Clinton from envisioning and building a grass-roots campaign like Obama's? No. Did misogyny prevent Clinton from apologizing for her Iraq war vote like Edwards did? No. Did misogyny somehow paralyze her campaign's first-response/messaging team and let dozens of ridiculously anti-woman, anti-Hillary memes get disseminated in the mass media? Maybe. Maybe she shouldn't let a pollster like Mark Penn also be her campaign manager.
Real bitches don't whine. They just get the job done.
If Clinton runs again, I'd like to see how her tactics hold up against some of the truly accomplished women who are currently governors, members of congress and others in elected office. Women like McCaskill, Sebelius, Boxer, Feinstein, Granholm (born in Canada, more's the pity), Napolitano, and Minner, to name a few. Good luck to Clinton running against some of the accomplished Republican women who are governors. They're all in the pipeline and they'll be ready to run as early as 2012.
JackieBinAZ
It's a sad statement in 2008...