i was down with understanding the other problems, but the last one i dont get.
"In other words, if Islam taught us to love humanity – instead of just Muslims – then why was our focus just on Muslims?"
because we are Muslims, and bad things are being done in our name. does defining ourselves automatically necessitate creating an "other" whom we cant relate to or empathize with? the fact that you are posting this on a blog called "jewcy.com" is proof enough that this is not the case (props to them for recognizing this). who were we (you) demonizing simply by calling yourselves "states of islam"? to my recollection, all were welcome, and we had a diverse bunch working towards the same goal.
"Fundamentalists are then able to frame traditional adherents as illegitimate compromisers, even though the traditionalists are the ones often coming from an ancient paradigm of allowing for various viewpoints and expressions..."
I just wanted to say that I think this point really captures a large part of the problem - its interesting for me to learn that the same issue exists within Jewish communities as in Muslim ones. My question is why is it much harder today to reconcile science and faith than it was previously, such that tradionalists are pressured to radicalize?