No. Simply enormous case of tribalism.

What penises?

That is, the idea that men with obscenely small penises become Neocons. The "men" above can confirm this.  Booyah!!!

Paul Wolfowitz has bigger penis than you.

A small penis is embarrassing, sure, but what's obscene about it?

As a neocon I think I can put this whole thing to rest. I have a shockingly small penis, and I do in fact feel obligated to force the rest of the world to enjoy it.

In classical Rome a small penis was considered a sign of virtue, of manly self-control. And Leo Strauss was preoccupied with classical values and classical thinkers. Coincidence? Only a fool would think so. I'm going to reevaluate my politics in light of this. I don't want my penis getting any bad PR, its shortcomings are hard enough to deal with as is.

is up to your lover, as Kant knew. It's up to her or him to judge its value.

 

All cons avoid knowing this.

Kant didn't have lovers.

He invented the garter belt for God's sake. 

He slept in a cellophane wrap because he was afraid of his man fluids.

Eli's profile photo clearly shows a man anxious for cock.