Mon, May 12, 2008

User login

DIALOGUE
Jews Should Turn Back to the Sephardic Legacy
They don't even know what's in their siddur! The Ashkenazim, that is.

From: Stephen Schwartz
To: Kerry Olitzky
Subject: Muslims and Jews—a single “ummah”

Kerry,Yes, This is a Jew: Ashkenazim need to get with itYes, This is a Jew: Ashkenazim need to get with it

We’ve discussed including non-Jews or intermarried couples in the Jewish community. But how about bringing the Sephardim into the American Jewish dialogue? American Jews hardly know that Sephardic tradition exists, even as they use a siddur filled with Sephardic compositions.

I remember with great distaste an editor of a leading Jewish journal telling me his paper had published enough on Sephardim and would not be interested in anything more about them. Another editor at the same paper told me the Sephardim daven without knowing the meaning of the words.

The great self-anointed moshiach of Jewish studies, the Mexican-born Ilan Stavans, published a book of Sephardic writings that included nothing from the Balkans or other areas of long-existing Sephardic tradition. To some people the Sephardim are useful only to support fantasies about hidden Jews in New Mexico.

Jews should turn back to the Sephardic legacy, and come to better understand its role in the evolution of Judaism as it exists today. Bosnian Muslims asked me repeatedly about tensions between Ashkenazim and Sephardim and Mizrahim in Israel. All this is quite new to the Bosnian Muslims and they hardly know what to make of it.

Sephardic thought was influenced by the long Ottoman tradition of mutual respect between Jews and Muslims. A Bosnian Islamic theologian said to me, "Here Muslims and Jews were always a single ummah (community)."

The Ottomans always protected the Jews and viewed Eretz Israel in the terms enunciated by the Quranic verses in which Allah subhanawata'al promises the land to the House of Israel fCool Umbrella!: What if British and French colonialists had stayed out of the Middle East?Cool Umbrella!: What if British and French colonialists had stayed out of the Middle East?orever. The Ottomans also viewed Lebanon as basically a Christian land and appointed a Christian to rule there.

Here is a counterfactual supposition about Jewish history: What if the Ottoman empire had not been carved up by Britain and France after the first world war? And what if it had granted freedom to both Israel and the Arab states in the late '40s—with Israel seen as a Jewish partner to the Muslim states?

Stephen


Stephen Schwartz is the Executive Director of the Center for Islamic Pluralism in Washington, DC and author of the bestselling The Two Faces of Islam: Saudi Fundamentalism and Its Role In Terrorism (Doubleday).

He was born in 1948, and


More...

Anonymous


What?

This post makes no sense.

First of all, Stephen, if the Koran promises the land of Israel to Jews forever, why the unremitting Arab hostility to the state of Israel and the continued calls for a united Palestine from the river to the sea? Don't those Muslims read the same Koran?

Many Jews are very aware of the Sephardic influence, so I fail to understand the point of your essay. Descendents of Ashkenazi Jews follow Ashkenazi minhag, but that certainly does not mean that they are unaware of the work of Maimonides, Nachmanides, Judah Halevi and the Spanish Kabbalists.

In what way should Jews return to the Sephardic legacy? Slightly variant haftarah readings? Or are you arguing that Ashkenazi Jews are anti-Muslim for no reason and they should follow the 'more open minded' Sephardic worldview? Perhaps its the Muslims who need to return to the supposed Ottoman tolerance. Which was lacking when the majority of Sephardic Jews were ousted from their lands after the foundation of the state of Israel. Tolerant, indeed.





Anonymous


This post is nonsense

Most Sepharadim won't give muslims the time of day because they are fully aware of their Sephardic heritage. Look, being a dhimmi is not a bad gig in the Muslim world, if the other option are pogroms in the Christian world. But it is not something most Jews would be interested in if given the choice.

There is an anecdote particular to my own heritage where the King of Morrocco in World Word Two refused to hand over "his Jews" to the Germans to be sent to death camps (unlike what happened in Tunisia). That is very nice, but until after WWII most Jews had few, if any civil rights in Morrocco. It is only really the older generation of Sephardim who suffered the many dislocations after WWII that look back at the supposed tolerance they enjoyed in the Muslim world with rose-colored glasses. Most of us know better.





Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <cite> <code> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.