![]() |
'In Treatment' With Jewcy | |
| Tahl, Elisa and Emily watch HBO's latest and talk about their feelings | ||
|
by Elisa Albert, January 29, 2008
|
||
Gabriel Byrne: buttoning that top button might go a long way towards avoiding transference issues.HBO's buzzed about new series, "In Treatment"
-- about a therapist, his clients, and his own therapy -- offers an
interesting variation on the usual TV series rhythm we all know and
love. Instead of one episode per week, the show will air every
weeknight: each episode a therapy session with one patient, including,
on Fridays, the therapist in therapy himself!
The show is adapted from a smash-hit Israeli show called Be' Tipul ("In Therapy").
Since
we (Jews and the Jewcy staff, both) know a thing or two about therapy
-- insert Portnoy and/or Freud and/or Woody Allen reference here -- we
felt we should watch the show (consistently, because consistency is
key) and work through some of our feelings about it. But not our
feelings about our feelings, because that would be fucked up. You
should never have feelings about your feelings.
For those of us still deep in mourning for the philosophical
miracle that was "Six Feet Under", watching "In Treatment" may serve as
a healing balm, much like actually being in therapy, but without all
the, you know, talking and shit. Critical response has been mixed. But whatever. How did it make us feel?
Elisa Albert: "Gabriel Byrne is way, way too hot to be a therapist. But he seemed pretty good. No surprise Laura's in love with him: a man for whom there's no such thing as too much information?! Interesting how they started off with that huge revelation and can now move on freely to explore its impact... I think it's bogus when a narrative works the opposite way."
Emily Gould: "In a way I think it's too early to say anything about this show,
because I'm hoping Laura Mondays will be its low point. I mean, come
on, the patient who's in love with her therapist? At least when Tony
Soprano declared his love for Dr. Melfi you got the sense that at least
one of them knew he was being cliched and felt appropriately apologetic
about it.
There were moments when Laura was doubling back and correcting
herself as she narrated the story of her debauched evening that
reminded me of what therapy is really like. But maybe the premise of
the show is flawed because everybody knows real therapy is mostly
incredibly boring. I mean, that's why I pay a lady $125 an hour to talk
to her -- therapy is the place where you're allowed to be boring.
Meh, I dunno. Mostly I agree with the review that said the show seems designed to give
acting students really intense two-person scenes to work with."
Tahl Raz: "When we agreed to do this, I thought how fun it would be to reflect on the show while sharing our deep and dark secrets. But you guys aren't very self-revealing. Who replaced the two smart, funky Jewesses with Statler and Waldorf?"
Anyway, I kept thinking throughout the first episode just how terribly unrealistic the actual therapy was. I wanted to scream out to Laura, 'Hold up, lady! You're giving away too much.' Is it just me or is it better to take time with your confessions, meticulously preparing for your weekly face-to-face encounter, ensuring all your 'sharing' is edited and kosher -- after all, you want your therapist to think well of you, no?![]() |
Elisa Albert is the author of The Book of Dahlia and the short-story collection More... |
Post new comment