Tue, May 13, 2008

User login

DAILY SHVITZ
'In Treatment' With Jewcy
Tahl, Elisa and Emily watch HBO's latest and talk about their feelings

Gabriel Byrne: buttoning that top button might go a long way towards avoiding transference issues.Gabriel Byrne: buttoning that top button might go a long way towards avoiding transference issues.HBO's buzzed about new series, "In Treatment" -- about a therapist, his clients, and his own therapy -- offers an interesting variation on the usual TV series rhythm we all know and love. Instead of one episode per week, the show will air every weeknight: each episode a therapy session with one patient, including, on Fridays, the therapist in therapy himself!

The show is adapted from a smash-hit Israeli show called Be' Tipul ("In Therapy").

Since we (Jews and the Jewcy staff, both) know a thing or two about therapy -- insert Portnoy and/or Freud and/or Woody Allen reference here -- we felt we should watch the show (consistently, because consistency is key) and work through some of our feelings about it. But not our feelings about our feelings, because that would be fucked up. You should never have feelings about your feelings.

For those of us still deep in mourning for the philosophical miracle that was "Six Feet Under", watching "In Treatment" may serve as a healing balm, much like actually being in therapy, but without all the, you know, talking and shit. Critical response has been mixed. But whatever. How did it make us feel?

 


Elisa Albert: "Gabriel Byrne is way, way too hot to be a therapist. But he seemed pretty good. No surprise Laura's in love with him: a man for whom there's no such thing as too much information?! Interesting how they started off with that huge revelation and can now move on freely to explore its impact... I think it's bogus when a narrative works the opposite way."

Emily Gould: "In a way I think it's too early to say anything about this show, because I'm hoping Laura Mondays will be its low point. I mean, come on, the patient who's in love with her therapist? At least when Tony Soprano declared his love for Dr. Melfi you got the sense that at least one of them knew he was being cliched and felt appropriately apologetic about it.

There were moments when Laura was doubling back and correcting herself as she narrated the story of her debauched evening that reminded me of what therapy is really like. But maybe the premise of the show is flawed because everybody knows real therapy is mostly incredibly boring. I mean, that's why I pay a lady $125 an hour to talk to her -- therapy is the place where you're allowed to be boring.

Meh, I dunno. Mostly I agree with the review that said the show seems designed to give acting students really intense two-person scenes to work with."

Tahl Raz: "When we agreed to do this, I thought how fun it would be to reflect on the show while sharing our deep and dark secrets. But you guys aren't very self-revealing. Who replaced the two smart, funky Jewesses with Statler and Waldorf?"

Anyway, I kept thinking throughout the first episode just how terribly unrealistic the actual therapy was. I wanted to scream out to Laura, 'Hold up, lady! You're giving away too much.' Is it just me or is it better to take time with your confessions, meticulously preparing for your weekly face-to-face encounter, ensuring all your 'sharing' is edited and kosher -- after all, you want your therapist to think well of you, no?

Jesus, I'm screwed, right? I need to take my therapist up on his incessant requests to do double sessions.
In retrospect, that maybe the promise of the show; these bite-sized profiles acting as televised Rorschach tests of an individual's attitude toward therapy, in general, and the issues of each character in particular. So the gimmick of the whole show -- that it airs nightly for the next nine weeks, with the therapist keeping regular appointments with the same patients each night of the week, except for Fridays, when he goes to see his own therapist -- actually makes some sense. Chances are viewers will diverge on which characters engage them and it's a neat trick to allow them to tune in to only those that light their fire (personally, I can't wait for the dude that's mildly depressed, somewhat confused, spilling over with deep-seated resentment, and working out his Mommy issues.).

It'll be interesting to see how the show deals with the notions of "progress" and "resolution" -- both of which I have found to be utterly necessary for any successful narrative and at the same time somewhat lacking in my own therapeutic narrative. If the show does manage to give us some sense of progress and resolution, without being contrived, the Rorshach test will be more than diagnostic; it'll produce some catharsis.

But first things first: I hope the characters that unfold over the next week are way less annoying, and less boring, than Laura. As she delivered various facets of her screwy, cliched monologue, I kept thinking of Mel Brook's concise summary of therapy, 'The therapist determines the nature of the problem; grabs the patient briskly by the shoulders; shakes the patient roughly but not unkindly; and says ... 'This thing you're doing; don't do that.'

In retrospect, again, that maybe the insurmountable challenge of the show. Depressed people are like oral sex -- if you're not in the mood, it's just irritating labor."
Next: Part Two

Elisa Albert is the author of The Book of Dahlia and the short-story collection


More...

Post new comment

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <cite> <code> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.