Thu, Aug 28, 2008

User login

DAILY SHVITZ
Environmentalists Are The New Communists

Hey comrade, can you spare a Prius?: Vaclav KlausHey comrade, can you spare a Prius?: Vaclav KlausI didn't say it, Czech President Vaclav Klaus did:

'Communism has been replaced by the threat of an ambitious environmentalism,' Klaus wrote in response to questions from the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Energy and Commerce.

[...]

'[Poor countries] will not be able to absorb new technological standards required by the anti-greenhouse religion, their products will have difficulty accessing the developed markets, and as a result the gap between them and the developed world will widen,' he wrote.

'This ideology preaches earth and nature and under the slogans of their protection – similarly to the old Marxists – wants to replace the free and spontaneous evolution of mankind by a sort of central, now global, planning of the whole world,' he added.

Actually, Marxists are much closer to anti-Kyoto skeptics of global warming since both think unfettered industrialization is a good thing. But one appreciates the point of turning a push for societal reform into an encompassing, messianic ideology.

That Al Gore has little time for anything else besides chlorofluorocarbons and soggy glaciers is termed "passion" in the American press. In Eastern Europe, it's reason to crank up the Velvet Underground.



Michael is a contributing editor of Jewcy. His work has appeared in Slate, Gawker, New York, Democratiya, The New Criterion and The Weekly Standard. His blog is Snarksmith.


More...

Anonymous


CFCs? You're about 20 years

CFCs? You're about 20 years behind the times -- they fixed that one.

And I believe it was the fettering, not the industrialization, that separated Communism from postwar America.





Michael Weiss


Re: CFCs? You're about 20 years

Wasn't talking about the Soviet-style Communism (or Stalinism, to call it by its right name) and American capitalism. Marxism would have had no time for the environmental movement because anything that hindered industrial development and prevented the sufficient conditions for proletarian revolution was deemed bad.

As for CFCs, wasn't that a big Gore worry more recently than 20 years ago?





Anonymous


CFCs were depleting the

CFCs were depleting the ozone; I believe they were unilaterally outlawed in the USA under Reagan and other countries quickly followed suit, and the ozone hole is gradually self-repairing.





Anonymous




Post new comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <cite> <code> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.