David Klinghoffer wrote "the Discovery Institute would protect, from legal or other harassment, teachers who include in their class discussions a review of the scientific evidence for an intelligent designer."

What is the scientific evidence for an intelligent designer? That evidence seems not to be forthcoming, instead all the DI's CSC does is attack evolution with the same poor creation science argument techniques of quote-mining and misrepresentation, as is demonstrated repeatedly on blogs such as The Panda's Thumb, Pharyngula, and other blogs at Science Blogs, as well as in journal articles, books, and in the courtroom in Kitzmiller v. Dover.