Sun, Jul 20, 2008

User login

jewlicious


Immoral Statutes?

Good grief. A Sanhedrin that sent one person to death in 70 years was considered a murderous Sanhedrin. You didn't just have to have 2 witnesses - they had to warn the transgressor ahead of time and the transgressor had to acknowledge the warning! I am a fierce foe of capital punishment, but if the rules for the administration of capital punishment in the US or Canada were this stringent, I'd be a supporter. You want immoral statutes, you want moral repugnance? You need only look in your own backyard - look at Texas, look at Florida and other States in the US that allow capital punishment. Look at how defendants who are poor and of color are far more likely to be executed than are white folks. I remain amazed...





Reply

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <cite> <code> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.