Again this exemplifies the utter arrogance in ignorance that is committed by atheists.

IF you were presented a code for software that you were completely ignorant of but could still ascertain it to fulfill a pattern, AND you acknowledged that the pattern fulfilled a purpose (i.e. software), THEN wouldn't reason dictate that the code was a PROGRAM that presupposes a PROGRAMMER as opposed to random chance?

That is what I believe that Collins and Prager are implying. Whereby Collins has a talent and skill to ascertain patterns better than you, Dawkins, Harris, or I.

Hence, respect and not ridicule is due to those scientists who are believers.