I think Hadar's arguement was that Michael's post was not anti animals or even pro Michael Vick. What I think Michaels post is about, albeit in a potentially inflaming way (funny), are questions about how we deal with events in society; media, public discourse, our backyards etc.
Anonymous
I think Hadar's arguement
I think Hadar's arguement was that Michael's post was not anti animals or even pro Michael Vick. What I think Michaels post is about, albeit in a potentially inflaming way (funny), are questions about how we deal with events in society; media, public discourse, our backyards etc.