Why, if you reject reason, did you agree to enter into a debate? There can be no exchange of ideas if one side rejects the basic principles of logic? Isa presents an argument and you say "cuz I wanna!" in flowery nonsense language referencing belief systems for which the only proof is that you think they exist (oh, and you think other people think they exist but refuse to admit it).

Only one side in this exchange put anything about meat consumption on the table. You just told everyone to get in touch with their feelings and made reference to the idea that if someone's feelings were different from yours they were only getting in touch with illusions and false desires.

Debate is for the rational and that's all there is to it.

Cheers,
Dave
(anarchist, vegan, anti-theist)