Ruling the World Bank like it's your personal fiefdom and appointing your girlfreind to a salary more than that of the Secretary of State's is not a non-issue. Nepotism at a public institution is never a non-issue!
To call this a non-issue is to say "I'm totally ok with corruption. Maybe he can have his goldfish draw a salary, too. It's ok because of all the good work he does!"
Even if he was doing good work (and I disagree that he is), why doesn't this corruption bother you in and of itself?
Anonymous
And, again...
Ruling the World Bank like it's your personal fiefdom and appointing your girlfreind to a salary more than that of the Secretary of State's is not a non-issue. Nepotism at a public institution is never a non-issue!
To call this a non-issue is to say "I'm totally ok with corruption. Maybe he can have his goldfish draw a salary, too. It's ok because of all the good work he does!"
Even if he was doing good work (and I disagree that he is), why doesn't this corruption bother you in and of itself?