Sun, Jul 20, 2008

User login

Jessica


In Tahl's defense...

Tahl was asked to represent his generation's version of those definitions and also his own opinion.

 Just because the particularist american 20- and 30somethings have made their "definitions" clear, doesn't make those definitions permanent. By defining our terms away from previous generations, we *are* grappling with the existence of a Jewish people.

Also-- Tahl, thanks for speaking so clearly about intermarriage. I wish more people would agree with you, but I think your definition is quite radical.

Jessica





Reply

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <cite> <code> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.