"I would refer you to Cori C--who knows more about the school than I do."

What makes you say this? Do you mean that you know lots about the school and Cori knows even more? Or do you mean (and I suspect this alternative is the right one) that you don't know much about it and defer to Cori's expertise?

If the latter, the obvious question arises; if you're not up to speed, with reference to what do you credit Cori's account? How do you know what she knows? Could it be that it's because her subclinical paranoia comports with your own views?

I noted several specific falsehoods of hers in my earlier comment. And you....segregating kids on the basis of sex? Not to my knowledge. But you may find out more about this matter by referring to last week's front page piece in the NYT, which did a decent job recapping the whole sad story. I suspect this article's appearance is why Daniel chose to remark on the saga now.

No conspiracy, naf (though there's your paranoid bent rearing its head again). Just a group of Muslim haters openly trying to legalize their prejudices. If the NYT still has the videos on its website, you really need to get a load of the reptilian Pipes squirming in full duplicitous mode. The NY Post referred to the school, insanely, as a madrassa. Pipes was happy to repeat this often and loudly. When asked if he had evidence that "madrassa" was in any way an accurate depiction, he agreed it wasn't, then mushmouthed some non-apology, acting as though his gleeful, frequent and deliberate repetition of this lie was an oversight. Filthy swine.   

But even if I were tossing out conspiracy theories, this would have no bearing on Cori's racism or her even more profound inanity.

 David Friedman-

Lay off drinking from the Well of Stupidity. Please provide citation for Almontaser's "support" of jihadwear. Trick request-you can't because it doesn't exist. She was asked about the offending shirts, which were produced by a woman's art collective that shared an office suite with her and to which she didn't belong. Good pedagogue that all agree she is, she took the opportunity to educate her interlocutor about the meanings of the word. Foolish soul, benighted beneath her hijab-she didn't realize that Daniel Pipes has exclusive rights to Arabic semantics.

Technically, she's not a terrorist? This suggests that she is one in some other sense. Please advise which sense this might be, if you can get up from all fours, quit licking your balls and place your paws on the keyboard.

I know, I know. Technically, you're not a mangy, dumb, ill-tempered cur.