Jewcy gets yet another black eye by going after a sterling academic, Daniel Pipes who has made no error in his coverage of the infamous woman and her support for tax-payer funded "Intifada" T- shirts.

The public is assured "SHE IS NOT TECHNICALLY A TERRORIST!!"--as if only those who detonate the bombs are the problem.  Technically, she is not a terrorist. Daniel Pipes did not make that accusation and he is so obviously not an enemy of this nation--what kind of chutzpah leads someone to even contemplate such an insult to our intelligence--what kind of depravity?  

On another thread, the author throws his poison pen at another person but it is apparent it is only a contortion of his own petty, narrowmindedness:

Isn't there a point at which you pull back, think about what a
laughingstock you've made yourself, and just sort of scurry away? Tho'
I guess a complete suppression of any sense of shame or embarrassment
is a precondition for writing in the manner of Infantile Gassy....

 Debbi A was fired for cause and blasting Daniel Pipes for merely referencing the dispute is the kind of prejudice no one deserves--especially a man as distinguished as Daniel Pipes.