I don't have the time or inclination to explain why codifying discimination against gay men and women is codifying discrimination to people who can't infer one from the other without extra help, but here is where, perhaps not my philosophy degree, but simple practical reasoning skills come in handy.
Sullivan's original claim: Kristol is a manipulator of Christians.
Wieseltier's claim: That's Jew baiting.
My claim: No, it obviously isn't.
Your claim: Sullivan's original claim is wrong. About which you are wrong, but if you were right, has no bearing on Wieseltier's willful and pernicious mischaracterization of Sullivan's claim.
To reiterate: I don't have the time to correct everyone on the internet who embraces an odious agenda of discrimination against gay people and uses euphemisms to do it. None of which is germane to the matter at hand, and if that's the direction you want to take this thread, you can do it on your own.
Daniel Koffler
I don't have the time or
I don't have the time or inclination to explain why codifying discimination against gay men and women is codifying discrimination to people who can't infer one from the other without extra help, but here is where, perhaps not my philosophy degree, but simple practical reasoning skills come in handy.
Sullivan's original claim: Kristol is a manipulator of Christians.
Wieseltier's claim: That's Jew baiting.
My claim: No, it obviously isn't.
Your claim: Sullivan's original claim is wrong. About which you are wrong, but if you were right, has no bearing on Wieseltier's willful and pernicious mischaracterization of Sullivan's claim.
To reiterate: I don't have the time to correct everyone on the internet who embraces an odious agenda of discrimination against gay people and uses euphemisms to do it. None of which is germane to the matter at hand, and if that's the direction you want to take this thread, you can do it on your own.