Mon, Jul 07, 2008

User login

Anonymous


reductive, incomplete and?

...unfortunately largely factual. I'm sure I'm not the only denizen of the EU who would rather disagree with mr. Wilders, were it possible to do so without lying to oneself.  Both Theo Van Gogh and Geert Wilders are easy to dislike, but that does nothing for or against their works. We could, of course, argue about the intentions of islamic immigrants 'till the mullahs come home;  we can discuss ( though we aren't qualified to ) interpretation of the Koran - but living in the here and now we are forced to deal with realities. Realities of Islam's adherents behaviour in the EU. Both Van Gogh and Wilders make a strong case for the proactive and vigorous exclusion of islamic emigrants from Holland  and the EU at large.

And while we're at it, neither of their works is an "attack on Islam"  - merely an exposition of eu islamist cultural propensities. 

It isn't  the open debate of islamic behaviour and mores that threatens liberal society, but the very behaviours under discussion....vide french islamic riots of 2005.





Reply

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <i> <strong> <strike> <b> <cite> <code> <u> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br> <img> <blockquote>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

Captcha
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.