Hillary's assumption that she deserves the nomination? Or her campaign's repeated dirty tactics? Her campaign has smacked of the worst type of white, liberal paternalism in its presentation of Obama and his campaign (which, of course, has its own flaws). The last thing this country needs is another manipulative presidential dynasty, it's just not good for democracy. And I would dare say it is not good for feminism to appoint its modern spokeswoman, someone who has no qualms with employing Rove-esque techniques to accomplish her goal. To potential destory her own party, because of her own power hunger and ultimate poltiical desires. So listing the three objections that you do are, ultimately misleading. And I don't think I am alone in being someone who was always somewhat middle ground about Hillary (and would consider voting for her) but has been so soured by this entire campaign that it is now out of the realm of possibility.