Thanks, Z, for your comment. I too wonder about the wisdom of keeping the loathesome effusions of salivating non-entities like our friend up there on the site, but my commitment to open discourse keeps me from taking the first step on the slippery slope of banishment of unpopular ideas (and I know that in his case, referring to his subcortical eruptions as "ideas" is a stretch.)

Anyway, it's nice to hear from an ideological opposite who endorses the notion of spirited debate and who can separate significant and principled disagreement from the sort of baboonish thuggery we witness above.